All, Minutes for the meeting are posted here: http://www.spdx.org/wiki/20120809-general-meeting-minutes Jack From: spdx-bounces@... [mailto:spdx-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Philip Odence Sent: Wednesday

Hi Everyone, I created a wiki page at http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 that covers agenda items for F2F in the next two months, proposed dates, etc. I think it is

In the general meeting tomorrow, would like to survey folks to see if there are any reasons left why we can't remove the "DRAFT" designation, and declare the SPEC as 1.1. Current DRAFT is at: http://w

Two items before the meeting: Here's the agenda for the face to face next Tuesday at LinuxCon. Note that a number of new folks have signed up so we have added an upfront overview of SPDX. 1-1:30 Intro

Thank you to everyone who submitted comments and bugs. :) The bugzilla bugs with the spec itself, targetted to 1.1, are now all resolved, and written comments provided so far by email have been addres

Hi All, As follow up to this morning's call, please sign up to the F2F possible date here: http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 (add your name / location to the botto

Meeting Minutes: http://spdx.org/wiki/20120823-general-meeting-minutes Notice: We are trying to finalize the 1.1 spec. Tonight Kate is working through a handful of known typos in this version. http://

Jennifer Cloer (Linux Foundation PR) and I are finalizing a press release for SPDX 1.1 which will be very similar in structure to what we did for SPDX 1.0 last year. This is scheduled to hit the wire

Hi. I had sent messages about ADMS.FOSS (old name) / ADMS.SW (new name) in the past, so here's a bit of followup. FYI, the ADMS.SW 1.0 specifications [0] reuses some bits from SPDX : ADMS.SW Software

Thank you for the comments, all change requests received to date have been made in DRAFT 20120826, available at: http://www.spdx.org/wiki/spdx/specification Please let me know you spot any other conce

The SPDX team is proud to announces that the 1.1 version of the specification is now available, and replaces 1.0 as the current recommended version to work from. The 1.1 version of the specification i

All, As a follow up on our actions the web re-vamp team has been and continues to work to improve the quality of our website. You may already have noticed a few changes. Our initial focus has been on

Thanks for a great discussion on spdx its got me interested in wrapping spdx into my current release activities as a release manager. Say for example I ship an SDK and for a customer to use this SDK t

Hi Everyone, Based on the meeting we had at LinuxCon NA, I am sending some detailed examples of the idea I discussed during that meeting. Some fall under the Business team specifically, others are cro

Here they are: http://spdx.org/wiki/20120906-general-meeting-minutes

Hi All, It looks the F2F for Sept or Oct is gaining some steam with more people signing up as able to attend. Please see: http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 If you

Hi All, It appears it will be difficult to get a critical mass of people together for the F2F in 2 weeks, so we are pushing the meeting out. Thanks to all who signed up on the web and made an effort t

For those who didn't catch it, here's a pointer to the SPDX 1.1 press release and supporting quotes... http://www.linuxfoundation.org/news-media/announcements I would also point out that a public inst

Meeting Time: Sept 6, 8am PST / 10 am CST / 11am EST / 15:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html Conf call dial-in: Conference code: 7812589502 Toll-free dial-in number (U.S. and

I've not had much time to keep up with SPDX in the last few months, but I wanted to let everyone know that "the thread" that I've been insisting for years ought to be started on the BusyBox mailing li