Two items before the meeting: Here's the agenda for the face to face next Tuesday at LinuxCon. Note that a number of new folks have signed up so we have added an upfront overview of SPDX. 1-1:30 Intro

In the general meeting tomorrow, would like to survey folks to see if there are any reasons left why we can't remove the "DRAFT" designation, and declare the SPEC as 1.1. Current DRAFT is at: http://w

Hi Everyone, I created a wiki page at http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 that covers agenda items for F2F in the next two months, proposed dates, etc. I think it is

All, Minutes for the meeting are posted here: http://www.spdx.org/wiki/20120809-general-meeting-minutes Jack From: spdx-bounces@... [mailto:spdx-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Philip Odence Sent: Wednesday

Hi All, Here's some items that are worth setting up a F2F sometime in Sept or Oct: a. Review current state of affairs for each sub-team b. Current challenges, what are we doing about it, and how can w

Here’s the link to register (or modify your existing registration) for the upcoming Linuxcon in San Diego…. Per previous email from Jack we have a room reserved for an SPDX working group session on Tu

I have had an urgent trip arise and will be out of the office. Jack Manbeck has kindly offered to host. Also, with the new website, I have not been able to figure out how to post meeting minutes, so t

Hi All, We have been reviewing our booth space for LinuxCon NA and there is a possibility to provide SPDX WG with a standard table top. Would that work? Please confirm asap so we can plan for it. Than

Apologies, but I seem to have misplaced my notes from the last meeting and never posted the minutes. I'm truly baffled as I am generally pretty well organized along this dimension. Meeting Time: July

Attendees: Scott Lamons (host) Gary O'Neall Kamyar Emami Phil Odence Pierre Lapointe Michael Herzog Jilayne Lovejoy Steve Cropper (joined later) Agenda/Notes 1. Linuxcon (Panel, Working group meeting,

I wrote: Jilayne Lovejoy wrote at 13:04 (PDT) on Friday: Can you show me examples of software packages that use GPLv2-only-with-GCC-Exception? I'm amazed to learn that there's a package that uses it.

Philip Odence wrote at 11:52 (EDT) on Thursday: > Suprisingly after all the recent discussion on the General Meerting > list about expanding the list, no one has submitted any more licenses. FWIW, I l

http://www.spdx.org/wiki/20120712-general-meeting-minutes Attendance: 7 Technical Team Report - Kate 2.0 work Still working through use cases 1.1 work Still under revision but near completion LinuxCon

Apologies, but I seem to have misplaced my notes from the last meeting and never posted the minutes. I'm truly baffled as I am generally pretty well organized along this dimension. Meeting Time: July

Michel and Soeren, The scope of SPDX is to convey information about any kind of software license: open source, "free proprietary" like Sun/Oracle BCL or Oracle OTN, and other proprietary/ commercial.

A few upfront items: At the end of Thursday's meeting Ibrahim Haddad from the Linux Foundation will brief us on the recently announced Barcode Tracker and will explain how complementary it is with SPD

"Possibly" is not a term you want to use in a contract because it means something and its contrary. For instance we had problems of defining the i) definition of FOSS-for-contracts (I put the definiti

PDC- Public Domain Code? PAS- Publicly Accessible Software CAS- Community Accessible Software? GAC- Generally Accessible Code?

Michel, I went back and read your previous posts from February on this topic, (as I mentioned earlier in this thread, I don't follow SPDX closely. I mostly joined this thread (Kibo-like) when the term

Jilayne Lovejoy wrote at 20:01 (EDT) on Thursday: I agree that trying everywhere makes sense for what Michel is trying to do, since, as others have pointed out, there's no clear venue for the discussi