PDC- Public Domain Code? PAS- Publicly Accessible Software CAS- Community Accessible Software? GAC- Generally Accessible Code?

Michel, I went back and read your previous posts from February on this topic, (as I mentioned earlier in this thread, I don't follow SPDX closely. I mostly joined this thread (Kibo-like) when the term

Jilayne Lovejoy wrote at 20:01 (EDT) on Thursday: I agree that trying everywhere makes sense for what Michel is trying to do, since, as others have pointed out, there's no clear venue for the discussi

Dear all As you probably noticed Alcatel-Lucent is trying to implement the SPDX standard. We have an internal database on FOSS IP issues that has been created in 2002. and we are trying to implement a

Attached is a document that explains the rationale behind why the Creative Commons Zero license was selected by the SPDX legal working group. The core requirements for consideration were: o does not i

Gentlemen, I think that some of the confusion about email lists is due to the fact that we "deprecated" spdx@... some time past and switched to using list-name@... format. I don't recall the date of t

I agree for this particular topic (but it seems I am not part of this mailing list). But I am more ambitious, I have other initiatives in the pockets: having an open source DB describing the foss IP i

Dear all, once again on a different topic within our current effort in implementing the SPDX standard. Here it is a licensing issue. I am not very comfortable with the licensing issue for the data whe

Jilayne Lovejoy wrote: > In regards to your posting...to... the FSF legal network Just for clarification: the FSF doesn't have a legal network, to my knowledge. I believe you are likely referring to t

To SPDX General List Members, The legal team is putting final touches on matching guidelines. In case you have not been following, this is your chance to speak up if you see any show-stoppers. The leg

Hello, The text of Package Verification Code (section 4.7) has been changed from SPDX 1.0 to SPDX 1.1 draft. 1) Does that mean that the algorithm changed or is it just described better? 2) After sorti

Hello, The compiled version et the Java tools in this page: http://www.spdx.org/tools is rather old compared to the source code found in http://git.spdx.org/?p=spdx-tools.git;a=summary Can someone ple

I am on vacation. Kate will fill in for me. Meeting Time: June14, 8am PST / 10 am CST / 11am EST / 15:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html Conf call dial-in: Conference code: 7

Hello, In the SPDX 1.0 and spdx-1.1-rc20120403.pdf I read: 7.3.6 RDF: property spdx:comment in class spdx:Review Example: <Review> <rdfs:comment> All of the licenses seen in the file, are matching wha

Hello, In the SPDX 1.0 and spdx-1.1-rc20120403.pdf I read: 4.9.4 Data Format: free form text that can span multiple lines. In tag format this is delimited by <text> .. </text>. 4.9.5 Tag: “PackageSour

Hello, I have questions regarding the syntax of comments in an SPDX file in tag format. From the examples, it seems that ## starts a comment. For example: ## Creation Information But I do not see wher

Arrgggh. Sorry for the volume. In my earlier note, I provided the wrong link for the Biz Team work looking to be reviewed. Use this one: http://spdx.org/wiki/spdx-vision-mission From: Michael Herzog <

Please take the time to review Legal Team description and License List description as well as Mission/Vision work from Business Team. Attendance: 10 May 17 minutes approved Legal Team Report - Jilayne

Hello, I suggest the following improvements in the SPDX examples. They could be included in the final 1.1 spec. In 4.1.6 replace <name>glibc 2.11.1</name> with <name>glibc</name> In 4.3.6 replace <pac

All, I neglected to include the minutes from the last meeting in my reminder email. First order of business is to approve. http://www.spdx.org/wiki/20120517-general-meeting-minutes Phil