I am traveling in Europe and will not be able to join, so Kirsten will be running. Meeting Time: Oct 18, 8am PST / 10 am CST / 11am EST / 15:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.htm

Sorry for the late reminder. Meeting Time: Oct 4, 8am PST / 10 am CST / 11am EST / 15:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html Conf call dial-in: Conference code: 7812589502 Toll-f

Hi everybody, We are trying to create a Web site where we publish the licensing data of open source applications. This is work in progress, and it needs work. We are trying to analyze different versio

This event has been canceled and removed from your calendar. SPDX Legal Workstream Call 11ET/10CT/8PT All: Re-sending invite for regular bi-weekly SPDX Legal Workstream call. Many thanks, Rockett Moto

I've not had much time to keep up with SPDX in the last few months, but I wanted to let everyone know that "the thread" that I've been insisting for years ought to be started on the BusyBox mailing li

Meeting Time: Sept 6, 8am PST / 10 am CST / 11am EST / 15:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html Conf call dial-in: Conference code: 7812589502 Toll-free dial-in number (U.S. and

For those who didn't catch it, here's a pointer to the SPDX 1.1 press release and supporting quotes... http://www.linuxfoundation.org/news-media/announcements I would also point out that a public inst

Hi All, It appears it will be difficult to get a critical mass of people together for the F2F in 2 weeks, so we are pushing the meeting out. Thanks to all who signed up on the web and made an effort t

Hi All, It looks the F2F for Sept or Oct is gaining some steam with more people signing up as able to attend. Please see: http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 If you

Here they are: http://spdx.org/wiki/20120906-general-meeting-minutes

Hi Everyone, Based on the meeting we had at LinuxCon NA, I am sending some detailed examples of the idea I discussed during that meeting. Some fall under the Business team specifically, others are cro

Thanks for a great discussion on spdx its got me interested in wrapping spdx into my current release activities as a release manager. Say for example I ship an SDK and for a customer to use this SDK t

All, As a follow up on our actions the web re-vamp team has been and continues to work to improve the quality of our website. You may already have noticed a few changes. Our initial focus has been on

The SPDX team is proud to announces that the 1.1 version of the specification is now available, and replaces 1.0 as the current recommended version to work from. The 1.1 version of the specification i

Thank you for the comments, all change requests received to date have been made in DRAFT 20120826, available at: http://www.spdx.org/wiki/spdx/specification Please let me know you spot any other conce

Hi. I had sent messages about ADMS.FOSS (old name) / ADMS.SW (new name) in the past, so here's a bit of followup. FYI, the ADMS.SW 1.0 specifications [0] reuses some bits from SPDX : ADMS.SW Software

Jennifer Cloer (Linux Foundation PR) and I are finalizing a press release for SPDX 1.1 which will be very similar in structure to what we did for SPDX 1.0 last year. This is scheduled to hit the wire

Meeting Minutes: http://spdx.org/wiki/20120823-general-meeting-minutes Notice: We are trying to finalize the 1.1 spec. Tonight Kate is working through a handful of known typos in this version. http://

Hi All, As follow up to this morning's call, please sign up to the F2F possible date here: http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 (add your name / location to the botto

Thank you to everyone who submitted comments and bugs. :) The bugzilla bugs with the spec itself, targetted to 1.1, are now all resolved, and written comments provided so far by email have been addres