I've created a new mailing list for SPDX which is public for everyone and for which public archives are available. I've subscribed everyone from the package-facts list to this new list. The address is

More good. (although he should have mentioned Kate.) http://m.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/linux-foundation-launches-license-compliance-effort/7063?tag=mantle_skin;content

I uploaded the pretty printer java program to the source auditor ftp server. It’s a secure web server, so I apologize in advance if it’s a bit inconvenient to download. The ftp server is at ftp.source

Hello spdx mailing list I guess I am the first new subscriber, since you went public? My name is Soeren Rabenstein, I am in ASUSTeK's legal department since early 2009 and responsible for European leg

Sorry about any confusion. As per the minutes of the 7/29 meeting, no meeting today. Next meeting is normal time, two weeks from today. L. Philip Odence Vice President of Business Development Black Du

Hi all, While looking at the draft spec, i noticed that the specification examples page, <http://spdx.org/spec/examples>, is empty. However, there do seem to be some examples at <https://fossbazaar.or

Attached is the agenda. I've called out the logistical info separately. Note: We are in flux with dial in numbers, so please check every time. and Note: I am experimenting with using the Web log in to

Minutes - 2010/08/11 LinuxCon2010 Boston SPDX BOF Current status: - need to focus on goals for next 3 months - SPDX.org rollout, shadows fossbazaar.org for data. - mail list transfering to spdx@... wi

Some people have been asking for it. We finally have a pre-release. You can download it from: http://turingmachine.org/~dmg/temp/ninka-1.0-pre1.tar.bz2 (licensed AGPLv3) I have discussed with Kate tha

these the licenses we currently identify. Look particularly at the BSDs and MIts. Some are not licenses but their exception statements. I have the feeling that these cover around 75-86% of files in De

Hi, here is some feedback I received recently - I'm not sure how much of it is (still) relevant. Ciaran ============================================================================== Page 4: 1.1 typo?

I agree. Also: If an spdx document is supposed to contain all the license texts, isn't there a danger that we end up documenting 10 KB of source code with 1 MB of license texts? (Yes I know, if there

Just out of curiousity, what kind of wiki is FOSSBazaar using? It doesn't seem very full featured, so a lot of what I discussed doing at LinuxCon is going to be much more complicated. However, assumin

Hi Kate et al, As we discussed on the call a few times, I think having this amazing list of license in one place is a great asset to the community and I believe will help reduce license proliferation

an/listinfo/spdx What is the intended use case for an spdx file? So far it appears to me that it is supposed to describe one single software package. If so, I indeed see us attaching giant data amount

Hello, I'm new to the mailing list so forgive me if any of my questions/observations are redundant or minimally informed. I had a couple thoughts regarding various posts and the license list included

Bonjour I work in INRIA since 2009 and I follow all the exchanges about SPDX specification. I have read the V1.0 beta draft. This document seems very complete. I have just one comment. We would like t

SPDX colleagues: As per the last con-call, here's a shout out to those who wish to collaborate outside of the current bi-weekly calls to focus on the details of the RDF representation of an SPDX docum

hi everybody, Is anybody being successful at building and using ninka? So far I have not heard from anybody (neither good or bad news). Based on feedback we are planning to make a wider release. thank

SPDX RDF 'sub-group' meeting Tues Sept 7 invitation details Anyone is welcome; Gary, Jeff, Peter have accepted. Details below. SDPX RDF Sub-group Mtg 1 Tuesday Sept 7, 11AM eastern time Toll-free dial