updated draft: 20120826 now available.


kate.stewart@...
 

Thank you for the comments, all change requests received to date
have been made in DRAFT 20120826, available at:
http://www.spdx.org/wiki/spdx/specification

Please let me know you spot any other concerns.
DRAFT designation will be removed on Tuesday.

Thanks, Kate


Specific changes made to 20120826 draft:

Page 9: section: 2.2.1 - typo back-to back use of "of of" - FIXED
Page 15: Section: 4.5.1 - misspelling determination - FIXED
Page 15: section 4.6.1 - misspelling insufficient" - FIXED
Page 16: section 4.7.4 - misspelling " Preferred" - FIXED
Page 17: section 4.8.4 - typo use of "on on" - FIXED
Page 20: section 4.12.1 - delete "a" from ...as a "disjunctive" licenses. - FIXED
Page 21: section 4.12.5 - replace "bracket s" w/"parentheses" - FIXED
Page 23: section 4.15.5 & 4.15.6 - capitalize gnu c (GNU C) and add "." - FIXED
Page 23: section 4.16.5 & 4.16.6 - Provide more realistic text example.
- FIXED - inserted one sentence description of GNU C Library.
Page 25: section 5.3.7 - </licenseId> should be </licenseName> - FIXED
Page 25: section 5.3.3 - this section appears out of place. It has no label and it is position between Intent & Cardinality - REMOVED
Page 26: Section 5.5.6 - misspelling "standard" -FIXED
Page 28: Section 6.3.1 - typo "filein" - FIXED "file in"
Page 29: Section 6.4.1 (continued) - mentions the disjunctive option but not the conjunctive option. - FIXED. added conjunctive reference.
Page 33: Section 6.11.12 - fix typo-> infromration - FIXED
Page 35: Section 7.1.2 - typo - forgot "." - FIXED
Page 36: Section 7.3.6 - misspelling "conluded" - FIXED, and in 7.3.5 too.

Appendix II: update to use 1.1-DRAFT (24 Aug 2012 17:18 UTC/6b70e2)
- title updated from Vocabulary to SPDX(R) Vocabulary Specification
- TM --> (R)
- SdpxDocument -> SpdxDocument

--- On Wed, 8/22/12, kate.stewart@... <kate.stewart@...> wrote:

From: kate.stewart@... <kate.stewart@...>
Subject: updated draft: 20120822a now available.
To: "spdx@..." <spdx@...>
Cc: "spdx-tech@..." <spdx-tech@...>
Date: Wednesday, August 22, 2012, 8:41 PM
Thank you to everyone who submitted
comments and bugs.  :)

The bugzilla bugs with the spec itself, targetted to 1.1,
are now all resolved, and written comments provided so far
by email have been addressed to the best of my knowledge.

New version of the .doc and .pdf has been uploaded to
http://www.spdx.org/wiki/spdx/specification

Current version is:
http://www.spdx.org/system/files/spdx-1.1-rc20120822a.pdf

Please let me know if I've overlooked some comment.

Thanks, Kate


Fixes included:
- Bug 1039 - Wrong cross-reference in 4.12.2
- Bug 1043 - Inconsistency between concluded and declared
licenses
- Bug 1044 - Example is wrong in 4.13 Comments on Licence
- Bug 1045 - Spelling error in Review Comments
- Marc-Etienne Vargenau, Scott Lamons, Pierre Lapointe added
to thank you list
- Page 7: Section 1.7.2 correct the typo 201w -> 2012 -
FIXED
- Page 8: Section 2 minor word smithing -> "that enables
forward and backward compatibility for processing tools." -
FIXED
- Page 9: Section 2.3.1 missing "." - FIXED
- Page 13: Section 4.1.6 -RDF/XML example value should be:
glibc (not glibc 2.11.1). That is, it should be the same as
the Tag example. -FIXED
- Page 14: Section 4.3.6 -RDF/XML example value should be:
glibc-2.11.1.tar.gz (not glibc 2.11.1). That is, it should
be the same as the Tag example. - FIXED
Page 15: Section 4.5.1 - FSF -> spell out to be Free
Software Foundation -FIXED
Page 16: Section 4.7.2 - word smithing " It also permits one
to embedded the SPDX file within..." - FIXED

After Marc-Etienne called my attention to the overlooked
bugs,  I did a wider search and:
Bug 979 - SPDX licenses are disconnected from other
published versions of the license - FIXED (by section 5.4)
Bug 1016 - Publish description of structure and usage of
license list
- FIXED (by License Class in RDF in Appendix II and http://www.spdx.org/content/spdx-license-list)
Bug 1018 - Proposal to add comments to all concrete classes
- FIXED
(2.3, 3.3, 5.5, 6.11. 7.3 in spec)
Bug 1037 - Standard license properties are documented in RDF
but not in the spec- FIXED (see class:License in Appendix
II)

More info needed:
- Page 5: Section 1.3 minor word smithing  - not
spotting this change in the version attached to email
feedback.
_______________________________________________
Spdx mailing list
Spdx@...
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx