Date
1 - 2 of 2
artifactof proposal ratified... but couldn't post comment (Martin?)
Bill Schineller
Per our call, I attempted to comment on the ratification of the artifactof proposal by commenting on the wiki page
http://www.spdx.org/wiki/proposal-2010-10-21-3-artifactof Unfortunately, the wiki told me my comment triggered the spam filter and wouldn’t save it. Here is the comment (Martin?) “2010-11-18 general call feedback “By choosing to reference DOAP model, we are tacitly approving that an SPDX document may include with it additional information which is in the DOAP vocabulary. We are requiring that an SPDX 1.0 compliant parser be able to understand only the 2 fields from DOAP (name and homepage). If additional information from DOAP is included within the SPDX document, an SPDX 1.0 compliant parser may silently ignore the additional information. Folks on the 2010-11-18 general call accepted the ArtifactOf proposal, and rejected the 'File origin' proposal.” On 11/17/10 5:23 PM, "Philip Odence" <podence@...> wrote: Meeting Time: Nov18, 8am PDT / 10 am CDT / 11am EDT / 16:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html Bill Schineller Knowledge Base Manager Black Duck Software Inc. T: +1.781.810.1829 F: +1.781.891.5145 E: bschineller@... http://www.blackducksoftware.com |
|
Martin Michlmayr
I'm not sure why the system would flag this comment as spam but the
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
logs confirm that it did. I changed a setting so that comments marked as spam are no longer discarded; instead they require manual approval. Please post the comment again and I'll approve it. * Bill Schineller <bschineller@...> [2010-11-18 17:01]: Per our call, I attempted to comment on the ratification of the artifactof proposal by commenting on the wiki page --
Martin Michlmayr Open Source Program Office, Hewlett-Packard |
|