Decouple license list from the spec
Dear alltoggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I perfectly understand the concerns. But I would like to emphasize that
imho one of the benefits of spdx for the industry is to have unequivocal
names/indicator for licenses.
Now if there are let's say five new licenses, the names of which are
Amazing Public License,
American Public License,
Amateur Public License,
Amoral Public License, and
Amusing Public License.
...and all of them get tagged "AmPL" in the name tag by someone, then I
will certainly end up with misunderstandings and confusion,
notwithstanding the fact that the text of the different AmPLs are
embedded in the file.
For me the idea of unequivocal "declared license" tags has a lot of
beauty, as this way compliance can be streamlined and partly
automatized, as I can trigger a certain process for a given license tag
appearing in the spdx. If I still need to legally review each spdx,
because many of the applicable license texts are embedded there, I lose
some of the benefits that spdx can have in daily industrial application.
the intended recipient or a person responsible for its delivery to thethey
=====================================================================================================================================toughshould be decouples...
This email and any attachments to it contain confidential information and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
is addressed.If you are not the intended recipient or receive it accidentally, please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and delete
the message and any attachments from your computer system, and destroy all hard copies. If any, please be advised that any unauthorized
disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted in reliance on this, is illegal and prohibited. Furthermore, any views
or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not represent those of ASUSTeK. Thank you for your cooperation.
Michael J Herzog <mjherzog@...>
+2 for decoupling the spec from the licenses. We need to be able to update the spec and the license list on different cycles. We should also anticipate that many orgs may want to keep a local copy of the SPDX license list.toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Michael J. Herzog
+1 650 380 0680 | mjherzog_at_nexB.com
nexB [Open by Design] http://www.nexb.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail (including attachments) may contain information that is proprietary or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for its delivery to the intended recipient, do not copy or distribute it. Please permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments, and notify us immediately at (650) 380-0680.
On 9/8/2010 4:05 PM, Kim Weins wrote:
I also agree that we should decouple spec from licenses. We need a way to