|
SPDX Goes ISO
A big +1 from me. Thank you to all the SPDX contributors and everyone involved in the years-long process of getting the SPDX standard to where it is today, and especially to Kate for her tireless effo
A big +1 from me. Thank you to all the SPDX contributors and everyone involved in the years-long process of getting the SPDX standard to where it is today, and especially to Kate for her tireless effo
|
By
Steve Winslow
· #1436
·
|
|
SPDX Governance Next Steps
Thanks Richard and Jilayne! Yes, in other cases we've seen one LF project become a member of another, for purposes of showing support and furthering collaboration between the projects' communities. In
Thanks Richard and Jilayne! Yes, in other cases we've seen one LF project become a member of another, for purposes of showing support and furthering collaboration between the projects' communities. In
|
By
Steve Winslow
· #1429
·
|
|
SPDX June General Meeting Minutes
Hi Philippe, Thanks for your comments and thoughts on this. I know this was a couple of weeks ago, but I had a few thoughts I wanted to share. You're right that the Community Specification License is
Hi Philippe, Thanks for your comments and thoughts on this. I know this was a couple of weeks ago, but I had a few thoughts I wanted to share. You're right that the Community Specification License is
|
By
Steve Winslow
· #1414
·
|
|
SBOM's going mainstream - Biden Cybersecurity EO
For those interested -- as a follow-up to Kate's message about the EO, here is an article in ZDNet that mentions several aspects of SPDX and how it addresses objectives of the EO: https://www.zdnet.co
For those interested -- as a follow-up to Kate's message about the EO, here is an article in ZDNet that mentions several aspects of SPDX and how it addresses objectives of the EO: https://www.zdnet.co
|
By
Steve Winslow
· #1404
·
|
|
Jitsi video calling for the General Meeting tomorrow
Thanks Jilayne! One tweak, just to clarify -- I haven't set up a separate Jitsi instance, the invite Phil will be sharing is instead for a Jitsi meeting on the standard free meet.jit.si service hosted
Thanks Jilayne! One tweak, just to clarify -- I haven't set up a separate Jitsi instance, the invite Phil will be sharing is instead for a Jitsi meeting on the standard free meet.jit.si service hosted
|
By
Steve Winslow
· #1397
·
|
|
Jitsi video calling for the General Meeting tomorrow
Hello all, Many thanks to all of you for your feedback and comments on this topic. Sebastian, thank you especially for investigating this and for your efforts looking into Jitsi hosting. I'm pleased t
Hello all, Many thanks to all of you for your feedback and comments on this topic. Sebastian, thank you especially for investigating this and for your efforts looking into Jitsi hosting. I'm pleased t
|
By
Steve Winslow
· #1393
·
|
|
"X.org Preferred License"
Hi Mark, The MIT license template on the license list [1] has the language "(including the next paragraph)" as optional text, which is why that part shows up in blue italics on the list [2]. I think t
Hi Mark, The MIT license template on the license list [1] has the language "(including the next paragraph)" as optional text, which is why that part shows up in blue italics on the list [2]. I think t
|
By
Steve Winslow
· #1365
·
|
|
Confirming General Meeting datetime and connection info
Hi VM, that's correct, for the time being the General meeting has continued to use UberConference for their monthly calls. Best, Steve
Hi VM, that's correct, for the time being the General meeting has continued to use UberConference for their monthly calls. Best, Steve
|
By
Steve Winslow
· #1349
·
|
|
[openchain] [spdx] Funding for Hosting On-Line SPDX Tools
Sorry to hear that, McCoy... I've reached out to the CommunityBridge maintainers to ask them to look into this and figure out what's going on. Will let you know what I hear back. Best, Steve
Sorry to hear that, McCoy... I've reached out to the CommunityBridge maintainers to ask them to look into this and figure out what's going on. Will let you know what I hear back. Best, Steve
|
By
Steve Winslow
· #1334
·
|
|
SPDX website updates
Hello SPDX community, This is a follow-up from discussions on several of the SPDX general meetings and workgroup calls over the past couple of months. The TL;DR version is: The main static pages for t
Hello SPDX community, This is a follow-up from discussions on several of the SPDX general meetings and workgroup calls over the past couple of months. The TL;DR version is: The main static pages for t
|
By
Steve Winslow
· #1324
·
|
|
SPDX License List inclusion principles and 3.9 release
Hello all, Following from Jilayne's email earlier this month, the legal team has now finalized and posted the update to the license inclusion principles for the SPDX License List. The updated principl
Hello all, Following from Jilayne's email earlier this month, the legal team has now finalized and posted the update to the license inclusion principles for the SPDX License List. The updated principl
|
By
Steve Winslow
· #1305
·
|
|
Is an UNCOPYRIGHTABLE License (or keyword) needed?
#poll
Hello all, there has been a related thread going on in the spdx-legal list: see https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/topic/71831424 As mentioned in that thread, I would note the Legal Team's comments o
Hello all, there has been a related thread going on in the spdx-legal list: see https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/topic/71831424 As mentioned in that thread, I would note the Legal Team's comments o
|
By
Steve Winslow
· #1295
·
|