Beats me. But to me the proposed solution looks much worse than whatever problem it is that you're trying to solve. Speaking of which, where is the document that describes the problem you're trying to

To add to Philippe's comments, and speaking on behalf of a major producer of open source software, the proposal for an "External Security and Asset Management Identifier" seems to be fundamentally fla

RMS - "Random May-be-free Stuff"? Wait. That acronym's also taken. Darn! <<Sorry, I just couldn't resist :) >> More seriously: my apologies, but no good name or acronym immediately comes to mind.

Re: "“Free and Open source Software” it is “Free and/or Open source software”; " I understand that. Which is why I said it is the union, rather than the intersection. In my highly simplified view, the

Re: " Out of this topic we just discussed (in my understanding) what could be a proper definition of “FOSS”. " The Free Software Foundation (FSF) and the Open Source Initiative (OSI) are the two organ

Oh, so _you're_ the guys to blame for people calling the license "Eclipse"! That explains everything. (just kidding)

I had no idea we were such troublemakers!

Tom, FWIW, It is certainly news to me that people refer to the EPL as "Eclipse". I have universally heard it referred to as the EPL. I have literally never heard it referred to as Eclipse. I don't hav

SPDX at 2012 Events The program for EclipseCon has already been finalized. But if anyone wanted to organize a meeting room or a BOF, that may still be possible.