We are seeking public comments for the next version of OpenChain specification which will conclude on December 10th. For those new to the specification - The OpenChain project has developed a specific

We are seeking public comments for the next version of OpenChain Specification. For those new to the OpenChain Specification - The OpenChain project developed a specification that defines a core set o

In 2016 we explored how the benefits of the Blockchain could be leveraged to assist with open source compliance across a complex manufacturing supply chain [1]. Our interest was sparked after witnessi

Hi Terin, On the surface the following appears to be syntactically convenient: license-expression = 1*1(simple-expression / compound-expression / "NONE" / "NOASSERTION") but semantically incorrect. Le

I would like to announce an upcoming SPDX webinar on Tuesday November 11th @ 12pm PST - it will include a commercial case study on how SPDX data was used in the license compliance review process to de

I would like to announce the availability of the SPDX Report Library. The objective of this program is to create a repository of articles to capture and share community knowledge about anything and ev

Hi David, Thank you for expressing interest in SPDX and for your insightful questions. >> SPDX-1.2 is not supported by this version of the rdf parser The SPDX 1.2 version of the specification has not

At the Linux Foundation’s Open Compliance Summit last October, we received several requests for SPDX file examples and a demo of SPDX file generation. Here is a web page that makes these resources ava

Attached is a document that explains the rationale behind why the Creative Commons Zero license was selected by the SPDX legal working group. The core requirements for consideration were: o does not i

Issue: Not clear how to include SPDX author comments to the consumers of the SPDX file. For example, a SPDX author may like to include a disclaimer, assumptions made, context of the analysis performed