Re: SPDX Oct Gen Meeting Minutes
Phil Odence
That’s great, Dick. A very important direction for us IMO.
From:
spdx@... <spdx@...> on behalf of Dick Brooks <dick@...> Thanks, Phil.
Kate/Gary, please let me know if there is anything I can do to help with a cyber risk assessment use case – I’m happy to contribute and learn.
Thanks,
Dick Brooks Never trust software, always verify and report! ™ http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com Email: dick@... Tel: +1 978-696-1788
From: spdx@... <spdx@...> On Behalf Of
Phil Odence via lists.spdx.org
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 7:43 AM To: spdx@... Subject: Re: [spdx] SPDX Oct Gen Meeting Minutes
Dick, apologies for the slow response. Frankly we had a pretty tech team update this time. I think it’s a good idea to get some specifics from profile sub-teams next month and (herewith) suggest to Kate/Gary.
From:
spdx@... <spdx@...> on behalf of Dick Brooks <dick@...> Phil,
I had to attend a CISA meeting held at the same time as the SPDX meeting; I didn’t see any info in the minutes regarding the work on profiles. Any updates to share on the progress to support profiles?
Thanks,
Dick Brooks Never trust software, always verify and report! ™ http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com Email: dick@... Tel: +1 978-696-1788
There were a few of anonymous participants that I did not include in the count. It would be helpful to get names for these minutes and to use them for future meetings. Also, while it’s not required to be affiliated with a company, that information is also helpful. I didn’t catch for everyone. If you’d like to me to add, just let me know via email. Additions/corrections also welcome. Best, Phil
L. Philip Odence General Manager, Black Duck Audit Business Synopsys Software Integrity Group, Burlington, MA M (781) 258-9502 | phil.odence@... https://www.synopsys.com/audits
https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2021-10-07
General Meeting/Minutes/2021-10-07< General Meeting | Minutes · Attendance: 25 · Lead by Phil Odence
Contents[hide]
Special Topics- Phil / Vicky[edit]· Governance Update · New governance is in place · Will be announcing mechanism for signing up Member Companies · With that will announce the mechanism for nominating Steering Committee members · Wipro · Vicky discussed Wipro’s view of benefits and reasons for joining Tech Team Report - Kate/Gary/Others[edit]
· Tools · no update · Specification · Spec version compatible with ISO, now available · Version 3 · Working on how to establish the repos · Question about SPDX Lite · That would be the minimum mandatory fields Legal team update - Jilayne[edit]· New license request volume slowed down this month · Doing some general catchup with members of the legal team · Due for a new release at the end of the month · Update on collaboration with OSI and FSF * Gary is working on 3 year old issues with the LicenseListPublisher to automate the inclusion of data from FSF and OSI * Data is in the isFsfFree column and the OSI approved columns for the SPDX listed licenses * Recently, getting good response from FSF and OSI - especially from OSI * OSI has a machine readable format that is being actively worked on * In addition to tool automation, there may be an opportunity for the legal team to have a communication process on license updates * Jilayne provided history on previous attempts to work with FSF on integrating their data which at times has been less responsive Outreach team - Sebastian[edit]· Recent Docfest was a success, brought in several tool vendors to compare results · Updated Wikipedia page progressing slowing · Lead section updated - this is what you seen when you do a Google search · Sebastian resolved an accessibility issue with the SPDX spec web pages - increasing the contrast making it much more readable · Website is being updated · A section will be added to showcase company usage of SPDX · Updating meeting time to be more time available · Times are shown as UTC Note: will change next month · new time will be the off weeks at the same time as legal · going to meetings every other week from once a week. Vicki pointed out that there will be more work being done on the mailing list, so feel free to volunteer for outreach activities even if you can't make the meetings. · Joshua reported the SPDX official podcasts started · Once a month · Outreach team will meeting every other month · Will interview many community members · Will follow-up with Vicki and others in the general meeting · Kate - presented keynote at open source summit · well received, good interested · Sebastian and Gary reporting increasing interest in SBOM tooling - we're seeing some good momentum
Attendees[edit]· Phil Odence, Black Duck/Synopsys · Alexios Zavras, Intel · Andrew Jorgenson, AWS · Kate Stewart, LF · Gary O’Neall, SourceAuditor · Bill Jaeger · Bob Martin, Mitre · Eric Billingsley, Calculi · Chrissini de Castro · Michael Mehlberg, Dark Sky Technology · Maximilian Huber, TNG · Sebastian Crane · William Cox, Synopsys · Vicky Brasseur, Wipro · Matthew Crawford, ARM · Marc Gisi, Windriver · Pierre Tardy, · Joshua Marpet, RM-ISAO · Brad Goldring · Paul Madick, Jenzabar · Jilayne Lovejoy, Red Hat · Christopher Lusk · Clement Poulain · Joshua Dubin, Verizon · Takashi Ninjouji
|
|
Re: SPDX Oct Gen Meeting Minutes
Thanks, Phil.
Kate/Gary, please let me know if there is anything I can do to help with a cyber risk assessment use case – I’m happy to contribute and learn.
Thanks,
Dick Brooks Never trust software, always verify and report! ™ http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com Email: dick@... Tel: +1 978-696-1788
From: spdx@... <spdx@...> On Behalf Of Phil Odence via lists.spdx.org
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 7:43 AM To: spdx@... Subject: Re: [spdx] SPDX Oct Gen Meeting Minutes
Dick, apologies for the slow response. Frankly we had a pretty tech team update this time. I think it’s a good idea to get some specifics from profile sub-teams next month and (herewith) suggest to Kate/Gary.
From: spdx@... <spdx@...> on behalf of Dick Brooks <dick@...> Phil,
I had to attend a CISA meeting held at the same time as the SPDX meeting; I didn’t see any info in the minutes regarding the work on profiles. Any updates to share on the progress to support profiles?
Thanks,
Dick Brooks Never trust software, always verify and report! ™ http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com Email: dick@... Tel: +1 978-696-1788
There were a few of anonymous participants that I did not include in the count. It would be helpful to get names for these minutes and to use them for future meetings. Also, while it’s not required to be affiliated with a company, that information is also helpful. I didn’t catch for everyone. If you’d like to me to add, just let me know via email. Additions/corrections also welcome. Best, Phil
L. Philip Odence General Manager, Black Duck Audit Business Synopsys Software Integrity Group, Burlington, MA M (781) 258-9502 | phil.odence@... https://www.synopsys.com/audits
https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2021-10-07
General Meeting/Minutes/2021-10-07< General Meeting | Minutes · Attendance: 25 · Lead by Phil Odence
Contents[hide]
Special Topics- Phil / Vicky[edit]· Governance Update · New governance is in place · Will be announcing mechanism for signing up Member Companies · With that will announce the mechanism for nominating Steering Committee members · Wipro · Vicky discussed Wipro’s view of benefits and reasons for joining Tech Team Report - Kate/Gary/Others[edit]
· Tools · no update · Specification · Spec version compatible with ISO, now available · Version 3 · Working on how to establish the repos · Question about SPDX Lite · That would be the minimum mandatory fields Legal team update - Jilayne[edit]· New license request volume slowed down this month · Doing some general catchup with members of the legal team · Due for a new release at the end of the month · Update on collaboration with OSI and FSF * Gary is working on 3 year old issues with the LicenseListPublisher to automate the inclusion of data from FSF and OSI * Data is in the isFsfFree column and the OSI approved columns for the SPDX listed licenses * Recently, getting good response from FSF and OSI - especially from OSI * OSI has a machine readable format that is being actively worked on * In addition to tool automation, there may be an opportunity for the legal team to have a communication process on license updates * Jilayne provided history on previous attempts to work with FSF on integrating their data which at times has been less responsive Outreach team - Sebastian[edit]· Recent Docfest was a success, brought in several tool vendors to compare results · Updated Wikipedia page progressing slowing · Lead section updated - this is what you seen when you do a Google search · Sebastian resolved an accessibility issue with the SPDX spec web pages - increasing the contrast making it much more readable · Website is being updated · A section will be added to showcase company usage of SPDX · Updating meeting time to be more time available · Times are shown as UTC Note: will change next month · new time will be the off weeks at the same time as legal · going to meetings every other week from once a week. Vicki pointed out that there will be more work being done on the mailing list, so feel free to volunteer for outreach activities even if you can't make the meetings. · Joshua reported the SPDX official podcasts started · Once a month · Outreach team will meeting every other month · Will interview many community members · Will follow-up with Vicki and others in the general meeting · Kate - presented keynote at open source summit · well received, good interested · Sebastian and Gary reporting increasing interest in SBOM tooling - we're seeing some good momentum
Attendees[edit]· Phil Odence, Black Duck/Synopsys · Alexios Zavras, Intel · Andrew Jorgenson, AWS · Kate Stewart, LF · Gary O’Neall, SourceAuditor · Bill Jaeger · Bob Martin, Mitre · Eric Billingsley, Calculi · Chrissini de Castro · Michael Mehlberg, Dark Sky Technology · Maximilian Huber, TNG · Sebastian Crane · William Cox, Synopsys · Vicky Brasseur, Wipro · Matthew Crawford, ARM · Marc Gisi, Windriver · Pierre Tardy, · Joshua Marpet, RM-ISAO · Brad Goldring · Paul Madick, Jenzabar · Jilayne Lovejoy, Red Hat · Christopher Lusk · Clement Poulain · Joshua Dubin, Verizon · Takashi Ninjouji
|
|
Re: SPDX Oct Gen Meeting Minutes
Phil Odence
Dick, apologies for the slow response. Frankly we had a pretty tech team update this time. I think it’s a good idea to get some specifics from profile sub-teams next month and (herewith) suggest to Kate/Gary.
From:
spdx@... <spdx@...> on behalf of Dick Brooks <dick@...> Phil,
I had to attend a CISA meeting held at the same time as the SPDX meeting; I didn’t see any info in the minutes regarding the work on profiles. Any updates to share on the progress to support profiles?
Thanks,
Dick Brooks Never trust software, always verify and report! ™ http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com Email: dick@... Tel: +1 978-696-1788
From: spdx@... <spdx@...> On Behalf Of
Phil Odence via lists.spdx.org
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 8:08 AM To: SPDX-general <spdx@...> Subject: [spdx] SPDX Oct Gen Meeting Minutes
There were a few of anonymous participants that I did not include in the count. It would be helpful to get names for these minutes and to use them for future meetings. Also, while it’s not required to be affiliated with a company, that information is also helpful. I didn’t catch for everyone. If you’d like to me to add, just let me know via email. Additions/corrections also welcome. Best, Phil
L. Philip Odence General Manager, Black Duck Audit Business Synopsys Software Integrity Group, Burlington, MA M (781) 258-9502 | phil.odence@... https://www.synopsys.com/audits
https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2021-10-07
General Meeting/Minutes/2021-10-07< General Meeting | Minutes · Attendance: 25 · Lead by Phil Odence
Contents[hide]
Special Topics- Phil / Vicky[edit]· Governance Update · New governance is in place · Will be announcing mechanism for signing up Member Companies · With that will announce the mechanism for nominating Steering Committee members · Wipro · Vicky discussed Wipro’s view of benefits and reasons for joining Tech Team Report - Kate/Gary/Others[edit]
· Tools · no update · Specification · Spec version compatible with ISO, now available · Version 3 · Working on how to establish the repos · Question about SPDX Lite · That would be the minimum mandatory fields Legal team update - Jilayne[edit]· New license request volume slowed down this month · Doing some general catchup with members of the legal team · Due for a new release at the end of the month · Update on collaboration with OSI and FSF * Gary is working on 3 year old issues with the LicenseListPublisher to automate the inclusion of data from FSF and OSI * Data is in the isFsfFree column and the OSI approved columns for the SPDX listed licenses * Recently, getting good response from FSF and OSI - especially from OSI * OSI has a machine readable format that is being actively worked on * In addition to tool automation, there may be an opportunity for the legal team to have a communication process on license updates * Jilayne provided history on previous attempts to work with FSF on integrating their data which at times has been less responsive Outreach team - Sebastian[edit]· Recent Docfest was a success, brought in several tool vendors to compare results · Updated Wikipedia page progressing slowing · Lead section updated - this is what you seen when you do a Google search · Sebastian resolved an accessibility issue with the SPDX spec web pages - increasing the contrast making it much more readable · Website is being updated · A section will be added to showcase company usage of SPDX · Updating meeting time to be more time available · Times are shown as UTC Note: will change next month · new time will be the off weeks at the same time as legal · going to meetings every other week from once a week. Vicki pointed out that there will be more work being done on the mailing list, so feel free to volunteer for outreach activities even if you can't make the meetings. · Joshua reported the SPDX official podcasts started · Once a month · Outreach team will meeting every other month · Will interview many community members · Will follow-up with Vicki and others in the general meeting · Kate - presented keynote at open source summit · well received, good interested · Sebastian and Gary reporting increasing interest in SBOM tooling - we're seeing some good momentum
Attendees[edit]· Phil Odence, Black Duck/Synopsys · Alexios Zavras, Intel · Andrew Jorgenson, AWS · Kate Stewart, LF · Gary O’Neall, SourceAuditor · Bill Jaeger · Bob Martin, Mitre · Eric Billingsley, Calculi · Chrissini de Castro · Michael Mehlberg, Dark Sky Technology · Maximilian Huber, TNG · Sebastian Crane · William Cox, Synopsys · Vicky Brasseur, Wipro · Matthew Crawford, ARM · Marc Gisi, Windriver · Pierre Tardy, · Joshua Marpet, RM-ISAO · Brad Goldring · Paul Madick, Jenzabar · Jilayne Lovejoy, Red Hat · Christopher Lusk · Clement Poulain · Joshua Dubin, Verizon · Takashi Ninjouji
|
|
Re: SPDX Oct Gen Meeting Minutes
Phil,
I had to attend a CISA meeting held at the same time as the SPDX meeting; I didn’t see any info in the minutes regarding the work on profiles. Any updates to share on the progress to support profiles?
Thanks,
Dick Brooks Never trust software, always verify and report! ™ http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com Email: dick@... Tel: +1 978-696-1788
From: spdx@... <spdx@...> On Behalf Of Phil Odence via lists.spdx.org
Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 8:08 AM To: SPDX-general <spdx@...> Subject: [spdx] SPDX Oct Gen Meeting Minutes
There were a few of anonymous participants that I did not include in the count. It would be helpful to get names for these minutes and to use them for future meetings. Also, while it’s not required to be affiliated with a company, that information is also helpful. I didn’t catch for everyone. If you’d like to me to add, just let me know via email. Additions/corrections also welcome. Best, Phil
L. Philip Odence General Manager, Black Duck Audit Business Synopsys Software Integrity Group, Burlington, MA M (781) 258-9502 | phil.odence@... https://www.synopsys.com/audits
https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2021-10-07
General Meeting/Minutes/2021-10-07< General Meeting | Minutes · Attendance: 25 · Lead by Phil Odence
Contents[hide]
Special Topics- Phil / Vicky[edit]· Governance Update · New governance is in place · Will be announcing mechanism for signing up Member Companies · With that will announce the mechanism for nominating Steering Committee members · Wipro · Vicky discussed Wipro’s view of benefits and reasons for joining Tech Team Report - Kate/Gary/Others[edit]
· Tools · no update · Specification · Spec version compatible with ISO, now available · Version 3 · Working on how to establish the repos · Question about SPDX Lite · That would be the minimum mandatory fields Legal team update - Jilayne[edit]· New license request volume slowed down this month · Doing some general catchup with members of the legal team · Due for a new release at the end of the month · Update on collaboration with OSI and FSF * Gary is working on 3 year old issues with the LicenseListPublisher to automate the inclusion of data from FSF and OSI * Data is in the isFsfFree column and the OSI approved columns for the SPDX listed licenses * Recently, getting good response from FSF and OSI - especially from OSI * OSI has a machine readable format that is being actively worked on * In addition to tool automation, there may be an opportunity for the legal team to have a communication process on license updates * Jilayne provided history on previous attempts to work with FSF on integrating their data which at times has been less responsive Outreach team - Sebastian[edit]· Recent Docfest was a success, brought in several tool vendors to compare results · Updated Wikipedia page progressing slowing · Lead section updated - this is what you seen when you do a Google search · Sebastian resolved an accessibility issue with the SPDX spec web pages - increasing the contrast making it much more readable · Website is being updated · A section will be added to showcase company usage of SPDX · Updating meeting time to be more time available · Times are shown as UTC Note: will change next month · new time will be the off weeks at the same time as legal · going to meetings every other week from once a week. Vicki pointed out that there will be more work being done on the mailing list, so feel free to volunteer for outreach activities even if you can't make the meetings. · Joshua reported the SPDX official podcasts started · Once a month · Outreach team will meeting every other month · Will interview many community members · Will follow-up with Vicki and others in the general meeting · Kate - presented keynote at open source summit · well received, good interested · Sebastian and Gary reporting increasing interest in SBOM tooling - we're seeing some good momentum
Attendees[edit]· Phil Odence, Black Duck/Synopsys · Alexios Zavras, Intel · Andrew Jorgenson, AWS · Kate Stewart, LF · Gary O’Neall, SourceAuditor · Bill Jaeger · Bob Martin, Mitre · Eric Billingsley, Calculi · Chrissini de Castro · Michael Mehlberg, Dark Sky Technology · Maximilian Huber, TNG · Sebastian Crane · William Cox, Synopsys · Vicky Brasseur, Wipro · Matthew Crawford, ARM · Marc Gisi, Windriver · Pierre Tardy, · Joshua Marpet, RM-ISAO · Brad Goldring · Paul Madick, Jenzabar · Jilayne Lovejoy, Red Hat · Christopher Lusk · Clement Poulain · Joshua Dubin, Verizon · Takashi Ninjouji
|
|
SPDX Oct Gen Meeting Minutes
Phil Odence
There were a few of anonymous participants that I did not include in the count. It would be helpful to get names for these minutes and to use them for future meetings. Also, while it’s not required to be affiliated with a company, that information is also helpful. I didn’t catch for everyone. If you’d like to me to add, just let me know via email. Additions/corrections also welcome. Best, Phil
L. Philip Odence General Manager, Black Duck Audit Business Synopsys Software Integrity Group, Burlington, MA M (781) 258-9502 | phil.odence@... https://www.synopsys.com/audits
https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2021-10-07
General Meeting/Minutes/2021-10-07< General Meeting | Minutes · Attendance: 25 · Lead by Phil Odence
Contents[hide]
Special Topics- Phil / Vicky[edit]· Governance Update · New governance is in place · Will be announcing mechanism for signing up Member Companies · With that will announce the mechanism for nominating Steering Committee members · Wipro · Vicky discussed Wipro’s view of benefits and reasons for joining Tech Team Report - Kate/Gary/Others[edit]
· Tools · no update · Specification · Spec version compatible with ISO, now available · Version 3 · Working on how to establish the repos · Question about SPDX Lite · That would be the minimum mandatory fields Legal team update - Jilayne[edit]· New license request volume slowed down this month · Doing some general catchup with members of the legal team · Due for a new release at the end of the month · Update on collaboration with OSI and FSF * Gary is working on 3 year old issues with the LicenseListPublisher to automate the inclusion of data from FSF and OSI * Data is in the isFsfFree column and the OSI approved columns for the SPDX listed licenses * Recently, getting good response from FSF and OSI - especially from OSI * OSI has a machine readable format that is being actively worked on * In addition to tool automation, there may be an opportunity for the legal team to have a communication process on license updates * Jilayne provided history on previous attempts to work with FSF on integrating their data which at times has been less responsive Outreach team - Sebastian[edit]· Recent Docfest was a success, brought in several tool vendors to compare results · Updated Wikipedia page progressing slowing · Lead section updated - this is what you seen when you do a Google search · Sebastian resolved an accessibility issue with the SPDX spec web pages - increasing the contrast making it much more readable · Website is being updated · A section will be added to showcase company usage of SPDX · Updating meeting time to be more time available · Times are shown as UTC Note: will change next month · new time will be the off weeks at the same time as legal · going to meetings every other week from once a week. Vicki pointed out that there will be more work being done on the mailing list, so feel free to volunteer for outreach activities even if you can't make the meetings. · Joshua reported the SPDX official podcasts started · Once a month · Outreach team will meeting every other month · Will interview many community members · Will follow-up with Vicki and others in the general meeting · Kate - presented keynote at open source summit · well received, good interested · Sebastian and Gary reporting increasing interest in SBOM tooling - we're seeing some good momentum
Attendees[edit]· Phil Odence, Black Duck/Synopsys · Alexios Zavras, Intel · Andrew Jorgenson, AWS · Kate Stewart, LF · Gary O’Neall, SourceAuditor · Bill Jaeger · Bob Martin, Mitre · Eric Billingsley, Calculi · Chrissini de Castro · Michael Mehlberg, Dark Sky Technology · Maximilian Huber, TNG · Sebastian Crane · William Cox, Synopsys · Vicky Brasseur, Wipro · Matthew Crawford, ARM · Marc Gisi, Windriver · Pierre Tardy, · Joshua Marpet, RM-ISAO · Brad Goldring · Paul Madick, Jenzabar · Jilayne Lovejoy, Red Hat · Christopher Lusk · Clement Poulain · Joshua Dubin, Verizon · Takashi Ninjouji
|
|
Thursday's SPDX General Meeting Reminder
Phil Odence
A couple of special items for this month’s meeting:
GENERAL MEETING
Meeting Time: Thurs, Oct 7, 8am PT / 10 am CT / 11am ET / 15:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html
Join the meeting:
Administrative Agenda Attendance Minutes Approval https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2021-07-01
Update/Presentation
Technical Team Report – Kate/Gary/Others
Technical Team Report – Kate/Gary/Others
Legal Team Report – Jilayne/Paul/Steve
Outreach/Website Team Report – Jack
|
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
Thanks, Phil – I’m very much looking forward to the configurable profiles capability.
Thanks,
Dick Brooks Never trust software, always verify and report! ™ http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com Email: dick@... Tel: +1 978-696-1788
From: spdx@... <spdx@...> On Behalf Of Phil Odence via lists.spdx.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 1:16 PM To: spdx@... Subject: Re: [spdx] SPDX Goes ISO
Yes, understood. Thanks, Dick. For that use case, the President was more concerned with a cyber attack that a license violation. This is the point of evolving SPDX to be “configurable” with profiles to meet different use cases.
From: spdx@... <spdx@...> on behalf of Dick Brooks <dick@...> Phil,
Minimal SBOM elements specified by NTIA for Executive Order (EO) 14028 do not include license data element requirements (see attached). The EO and the NTIA SBOM minimal elements focus on Cyber risk, i.e. C-SCRM, whereas license management is a Legal/Financial risk.
The use of SBOM for license legal risk management is indeed a good practice, but it is not required to satisfy NTIA minimal SBOM requirements for EO 14028.
Thanks,
Dick Brooks Never trust software, always verify and report! ™ http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com Email: dick@... Tel: +1 978-696-1788
Thanks, Matija. Absolutely not just license compliance. Security too is a big driver and an important part/direction of SPDX.
From: spdx@... <spdx@...> on behalf of Matija Šuklje <matija@...> Congratulations! |
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
Phil Odence
Yes, understood. Thanks, Dick. For that use case, the President was more concerned with a cyber attack that a license violation. This is the point of evolving SPDX to be “configurable” with profiles to meet different use cases.
From:
spdx@... <spdx@...> on behalf of Dick Brooks <dick@...> Phil,
Minimal SBOM elements specified by NTIA for Executive Order (EO) 14028 do not include license data element requirements (see attached). The EO and the NTIA SBOM minimal elements focus on Cyber risk, i.e. C-SCRM, whereas license management is a Legal/Financial risk.
The use of SBOM for license legal risk management is indeed a good practice, but it is not required to satisfy NTIA minimal SBOM requirements for EO 14028.
Thanks,
Dick Brooks Never trust software, always verify and report! ™ http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com Email: dick@... Tel: +1 978-696-1788
From: spdx@... <spdx@...> On Behalf Of
Phil Odence via lists.spdx.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 11:53 AM To: spdx@... Subject: Re: [spdx] SPDX Goes ISO
Thanks, Matija. Absolutely not just license compliance. Security too is a big driver and an important part/direction of SPDX.
From:
spdx@... <spdx@...> on behalf of Matija Šuklje <matija@...> Congratulations! |
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
Die 14. 09. 21 et hora 17:52 Phil Odence via lists.spdx.org scripsit:
Absolutely not just license compliance. Security too is aI know. I’m just excited by the prospect of synergies and more use of SPDX in the wild! I can already see how the wider community would start working together on joint SPDX documents, fixing issues together, nesting/referring existing SPDX documents for subcomponents in the SPDX documents of the wider codebase instead of re-scanning the whole thing over and over again …ah, may the dreams finally become true! :) cheers, Matija -- gsm: tel:+386.41.849.552 www: https://matija.suklje.name xmpp: matija.suklje@... sip: matija_suklje@... |
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
Phil,
Minimal SBOM elements specified by NTIA for Executive Order (EO) 14028 do not include license data element requirements (see attached). The EO and the NTIA SBOM minimal elements focus on Cyber risk, i.e. C-SCRM, whereas license management is a Legal/Financial risk.
The use of SBOM for license legal risk management is indeed a good practice, but it is not required to satisfy NTIA minimal SBOM requirements for EO 14028.
Thanks,
Dick Brooks Never trust software, always verify and report! ™ http://www.reliableenergyanalytics.com Email: dick@... Tel: +1 978-696-1788
From: spdx@... <spdx@...> On Behalf Of Phil Odence via lists.spdx.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 11:53 AM To: spdx@... Subject: Re: [spdx] SPDX Goes ISO
Thanks, Matija. Absolutely not just license compliance. Security too is a big driver and an important part/direction of SPDX.
From: spdx@... <spdx@...> on behalf of Matija Šuklje <matija@...> Congratulations! |
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
Phil Odence
Thanks, Matija. Absolutely not just license compliance. Security too is a big driver and an important part/direction of SPDX.
From:
spdx@... <spdx@...> on behalf of Matija Šuklje <matija@...> Congratulations! |
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
Congratulations!
This is indeed a massive step for the software world, and hopefully not just in terms of license compliance! hip hip hurrah! Matija -- gsm: tel:+386.41.849.552 www: https://matija.suklje.name xmpp: matija.suklje@... sip: matija_suklje@... |
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
Kate Stewart
The content that went into the standard is the same as what is in our github repo today, and a pretty version is at: https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/. The sources for the 2.2.1 are at: https://github.com/spdx/spdx-spec that fed into the review process. There's some editorial changes we incorporated into the ISO spec after the review, but nothing substantive, and we're working on a plan right now to capture those in SPDX 2.2.2 release. Net: the ISO version of the specification has some specific formatting requirements that ISO requests us to follow (document structure, table numbering, etc.), but the actual fields are publicly available either at the web link or the github repo directly. SPDX is a living standard that is evolving with open participation in the SPDX tech mailing list and calls. Issues and pull requests are encouraged and welcome as we continue to evolve to SPDX 3.0. Once we solidify on the next set of changes, we may decide to submit to ISO, but it's being worked on in the github repo first. Kate On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 1:34 PM Michael Richardson <mcr@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
Phil Odence
I believe that is correct. It seems an odd systems, but as I understand it, it’s not unusual to have free and paid for versions of specs with the same content. Openchain is, I believe, and example of same.
From:
spdx@... <spdx@...> on behalf of William Bartholomew via lists.spdx.org <iamwillbar=github.com@...> I’ll defer to Phil or Kate for an official answer, but my understanding is that SPDX will continue to publish the specification directly from the SPDX project to the community, but certain versions will be also published as ISO standards (the first being 2.2.1 which is materially the same as what’s published on the SPDX site today).
William
On 9/13/21, 11:34 AM, "spdx@..." <spdx@...> wrote:
It now costs CHF198 to buy. This is the ISO way, and I think it's literally criminal. As in: violates UN Charter of Human Rights.
If it doesn't wind up on the Publically Available Standards list, then I think it's just been killed as a specification. No open source person is going to buy the document.
|
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
William Bartholomew
I’ll defer to Phil or Kate for an official answer, but my understanding is that SPDX will continue to publish the specification directly from the SPDX project to the community, but certain versions will be also published as ISO standards (the first being 2.2.1 which is materially the same as what’s published on the SPDX site today).
William
On 9/13/21, 11:34 AM, "spdx@..." <spdx@...> wrote:
It now costs CHF198 to buy. This is the ISO way, and I think it's literally criminal. As in: violates UN Charter of Human Rights.
If it doesn't wind up on the Publically Available Standards list, then I think it's just been killed as a specification. No open source person is going to buy the document.
|
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
Michael Richardson
It now costs CHF198 to buy. This is the ISO way, and I think it's literally criminal.
As in: violates UN Charter of Human Rights. If it doesn't wind up on the Publically Available Standards list, then I think it's just been killed as a specification. No open source person is going to buy the document. |
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
Henk Birkholz
"I guess it will..." does not sound very reassuring, to be honest 🤠
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
So will it definitely become an "ISO Publicly Available Standard" and is that just a question of time? Viele Grü0e, Henk On 13.09.21 09:23, Alexios Zavras wrote:
I guess it will… |
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
Alexios Zavras
I guess it will… The OpenChain one took a couple of months to appear, though, so I don’t know how quickly this gets updated.
-- zvr
From: spdx@... <spdx@...> On Behalf Of
Vargenau, Marc-Etienne (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2021 16:40 To: spdx@... Cc: Vargenau, Marc-Etienne (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) <marc-etienne.vargenau@...> Subject: Re: [spdx] SPDX Goes ISO
Since the standard was not developed by ISO itself, will the standard be publicly available at https://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/ ?
I think it should.
Do we know?
Marc-Etienne
I’m pleased to announce that SPDX is now ISO/IEC 5962:2021.
Many people have worked hard over the last decade to get us to this point. Big credit goes to my Steering Committee colleagues who have all been instrumental. And we should recognize that this was all Kate’s brainchild. I believe it was Fall of 2009 when she started informally socializing the idea of a standard SBOM format at Linux Foundation events. Not too long thereafter, in the then single weekly meeting, early participants began debating whether it should be SPDE, ultimately deciding “X” at the end would be catchier. And now it’s officially caught.
Here’s the LF press release: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/press-release/spdx-becomes-internationally-recognized-standard-for-software-bill-of-materials
Best regards, Phil
L. Philip Odence General Manager, Black Duck Audit Business Synopsys Software Integrity Group, Burlington, MA M (781) 258-9502 | phil.odence@... https://www.synopsys.com/audits
Intel Deutschland GmbH |
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
This is wonderful news! Congrats to Kate and everyone else who had a hand in this! Hopefully this means wider adoption and growth for the future!
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Thursday, September 9th, 2021 at 11:02 AM, Phil Odence via lists.spdx.org <phil.odence=synopsys.com@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
Since the standard was not developed by ISO itself, will the standard be publicly available at https://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/ ?
I think it should.
Do we know?
Marc-Etienne
From: spdx@... <spdx@...> On Behalf Of
Phil Odence via lists.spdx.org
Sent: Thursday, September 9, 2021 5:03 PM To: SPDX-general <spdx@...> Subject: [spdx] SPDX Goes ISO
I’m pleased to announce that SPDX is now ISO/IEC 5962:2021.
Many people have worked hard over the last decade to get us to this point. Big credit goes to my Steering Committee colleagues who have all been instrumental. And we should recognize that this was all Kate’s brainchild. I believe it was Fall of 2009 when she started informally socializing the idea of a standard SBOM format at Linux Foundation events. Not too long thereafter, in the then single weekly meeting, early participants began debating whether it should be SPDE, ultimately deciding “X” at the end would be catchier. And now it’s officially caught.
Here’s the LF press release: http://www.linuxfoundation.org/press-release/spdx-becomes-internationally-recognized-standard-for-software-bill-of-materials
Best regards, Phil
L. Philip Odence General Manager, Black Duck Audit Business Synopsys Software Integrity Group, Burlington, MA M (781) 258-9502 | phil.odence@... https://www.synopsys.com/audits
|
|