Date   

updated draft: 20120826 now available.

kate.stewart@...
 

Thank you for the comments, all change requests received to date
have been made in DRAFT 20120826, available at:
http://www.spdx.org/wiki/spdx/specification

Please let me know you spot any other concerns.
DRAFT designation will be removed on Tuesday.

Thanks, Kate


Specific changes made to 20120826 draft:

Page 9: section: 2.2.1 - typo back-to back use of "of of" - FIXED
Page 15: Section: 4.5.1 - misspelling determination - FIXED
Page 15: section 4.6.1 - misspelling insufficient" - FIXED
Page 16: section 4.7.4 - misspelling " Preferred" - FIXED
Page 17: section 4.8.4 - typo use of "on on" - FIXED
Page 20: section 4.12.1 - delete "a" from ...as a "disjunctive" licenses. - FIXED
Page 21: section 4.12.5 - replace "bracket s" w/"parentheses" - FIXED
Page 23: section 4.15.5 & 4.15.6 - capitalize gnu c (GNU C) and add "." - FIXED
Page 23: section 4.16.5 & 4.16.6 - Provide more realistic text example.
- FIXED - inserted one sentence description of GNU C Library.
Page 25: section 5.3.7 - </licenseId> should be </licenseName> - FIXED
Page 25: section 5.3.3 - this section appears out of place. It has no label and it is position between Intent & Cardinality - REMOVED
Page 26: Section 5.5.6 - misspelling "standard" -FIXED
Page 28: Section 6.3.1 - typo "filein" - FIXED "file in"
Page 29: Section 6.4.1 (continued) - mentions the disjunctive option but not the conjunctive option. - FIXED. added conjunctive reference.
Page 33: Section 6.11.12 - fix typo-> infromration - FIXED
Page 35: Section 7.1.2 - typo - forgot "." - FIXED
Page 36: Section 7.3.6 - misspelling "conluded" - FIXED, and in 7.3.5 too.

Appendix II: update to use 1.1-DRAFT (24 Aug 2012 17:18 UTC/6b70e2)
- title updated from Vocabulary to SPDX(R) Vocabulary Specification
- TM --> (R)
- SdpxDocument -> SpdxDocument

--- On Wed, 8/22/12, kate.stewart@... <kate.stewart@...> wrote:

From: kate.stewart@... <kate.stewart@...>
Subject: updated draft: 20120822a now available.
To: "spdx@..." <spdx@...>
Cc: "spdx-tech@..." <spdx-tech@...>
Date: Wednesday, August 22, 2012, 8:41 PM
Thank you to everyone who submitted
comments and bugs.  :)

The bugzilla bugs with the spec itself, targetted to 1.1,
are now all resolved, and written comments provided so far
by email have been addressed to the best of my knowledge.

New version of the .doc and .pdf has been uploaded to
http://www.spdx.org/wiki/spdx/specification

Current version is:
http://www.spdx.org/system/files/spdx-1.1-rc20120822a.pdf

Please let me know if I've overlooked some comment.

Thanks, Kate


Fixes included:
- Bug 1039 - Wrong cross-reference in 4.12.2
- Bug 1043 - Inconsistency between concluded and declared
licenses
- Bug 1044 - Example is wrong in 4.13 Comments on Licence
- Bug 1045 - Spelling error in Review Comments
- Marc-Etienne Vargenau, Scott Lamons, Pierre Lapointe added
to thank you list
- Page 7: Section 1.7.2 correct the typo 201w -> 2012 -
FIXED
- Page 8: Section 2 minor word smithing -> "that enables
forward and backward compatibility for processing tools." -
FIXED
- Page 9: Section 2.3.1 missing "." - FIXED
- Page 13: Section 4.1.6 -RDF/XML example value should be:
glibc (not glibc 2.11.1). That is, it should be the same as
the Tag example. -FIXED
- Page 14: Section 4.3.6 -RDF/XML example value should be:
glibc-2.11.1.tar.gz (not glibc 2.11.1). That is, it should
be the same as the Tag example. - FIXED
Page 15: Section 4.5.1 - FSF -> spell out to be Free
Software Foundation -FIXED
Page 16: Section 4.7.2 - word smithing " It also permits one
to embedded the SPDX file within..." - FIXED

After Marc-Etienne called my attention to the overlooked
bugs,  I did a wider search and:
Bug 979 - SPDX licenses are disconnected from other
published versions of the license - FIXED (by section 5.4)
Bug 1016 - Publish description of structure and usage of
license list
- FIXED (by License Class in RDF in Appendix II and http://www.spdx.org/content/spdx-license-list)
Bug 1018 - Proposal to add comments to all concrete classes
- FIXED
(2.3, 3.3, 5.5, 6.11. 7.3 in spec)
Bug 1037 - Standard license properties are documented in RDF
but not in the spec- FIXED (see class:License in Appendix
II)

More info needed:
- Page 5: Section 1.3 minor word smithing  - not
spotting this change in the version attached to email
feedback.
_______________________________________________
Spdx mailing list
Spdx@...
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx


ADMS.SW 1.0 integration with SPDX

Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@...>
 

Hi.

I had sent messages about ADMS.FOSS (old name) / ADMS.SW (new name) in
the past, so here's a bit of followup.

FYI, the ADMS.SW 1.0 specifications [0] reuses some bits from SPDX :
ADMS.SW Software Packages are designed subclasses of SPDX Packages, and
have an optional 'checksum' property, that is mapped to an SPDX Package
Checksum in the RDF implementation of ADMS.SW 1.0.

I hope that will increase reuse and interoperability between Software
Catalogues (including development forges) using ADMS.SW and other SPDX
compatible tools.

Hope this helps.

Best regards,

[0] https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/asset/adms_foss/release/release100
--
Olivier BERGER
http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8
Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF
Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France)


Action Required: SPDX 1.1 Press Release

Lamons, Scott (Open Source Program Office) <scott.lamons@...>
 

Jennifer Cloer (Linux Foundation PR)  and I are finalizing a press release for SPDX 1.1 which will be very similar in structure to what we did for SPDX 1.0 last year.   This is scheduled to hit the wire next Thursday morning (same day as the SPDX Panel Discussion) and we would like to reference companies, projects, and institutions that have been involved in developing, supporting, implementing, or adopting the specification.      If you wish to be listed Jennifer will need your company approval  by close of business (5pm US Pacific time) next Monday 8/27 -- please reply directly to her.     You are also welcome and encouraged to provide a supporting statement as well although Jennifer will retain final decision making on whether it's included or not. 

Thanks,

 

Scott Lamons

SPDX Business Working Group

HP Open Source Program Office

970-898-2804

 


SPDX General Meeting Minutes and Important Notice

Philip Odence
 


Notice: We are trying to finalize the 1.1 spec. Tonight Kate is working through a handful of known typos in this version. 


The Tech Team is fine with the content. Unless anyone raises an alarm in the next few days, we will declare it the official 1.1 version.


F2F mtg in Sept / Oct

Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...>
 

Hi All,

As follow up to this morning's call, please sign up to the F2F possible date here:
http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 (add your name / location to the bottom of the page).

If you can host the meeting, please add your company/hosting site location to the page.

We will revisit this the week after LinuxCon NA and make a decision on location of the meeting, host, and possible way to join the mtg remotely. 

Thank you.
Ibrahim

--
Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D.
Director, Technology & Alliances
The Linux Foundation 
+1 (408) 893-1122
 


F2F in Sept/Oct - looking good - if you are not signed up, please do so

Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...>
 

Hi All,

It looks the F2F for Sept or Oct is gaining some steam with more people signing up as able to attend.

If you have not considered attending, please revisit and sign up for the dates you can.

Thank you,
Ibrahim 


updated draft: 20120822a now available.

kate.stewart@...
 

Thank you to everyone who submitted comments and bugs. :)

The bugzilla bugs with the spec itself, targetted to 1.1, are now all resolved, and written comments provided so far by email have been addressed to the best of my knowledge.

New version of the .doc and .pdf has been uploaded to
http://www.spdx.org/wiki/spdx/specification

Current version is:
http://www.spdx.org/system/files/spdx-1.1-rc20120822a.pdf

Please let me know if I've overlooked some comment.

Thanks, Kate


Fixes included:
- Bug 1039 - Wrong cross-reference in 4.12.2
- Bug 1043 - Inconsistency between concluded and declared licenses
- Bug 1044 - Example is wrong in 4.13 Comments on Licence
- Bug 1045 - Spelling error in Review Comments
- Marc-Etienne Vargenau, Scott Lamons, Pierre Lapointe added to thank you list
- Page 7: Section 1.7.2 correct the typo 201w -> 2012 - FIXED
- Page 8: Section 2 minor word smithing -> "that enables forward and backward compatibility for processing tools." - FIXED
- Page 9: Section 2.3.1 missing "." - FIXED
- Page 13: Section 4.1.6 -RDF/XML example value should be: glibc (not glibc 2.11.1). That is, it should be the same as the Tag example. -FIXED
- Page 14: Section 4.3.6 -RDF/XML example value should be: glibc-2.11.1.tar.gz (not glibc 2.11.1). That is, it should be the same as the Tag example. - FIXED
Page 15: Section 4.5.1 - FSF -> spell out to be Free Software Foundation -FIXED
Page 16: Section 4.7.2 - word smithing " It also permits one to embedded the SPDX file within..." - FIXED

After Marc-Etienne called my attention to the overlooked bugs, I did a wider search and:
Bug 979 - SPDX licenses are disconnected from other published versions of the license - FIXED (by section 5.4)
Bug 1016 - Publish description of structure and usage of license list
- FIXED (by License Class in RDF in Appendix II and http://www.spdx.org/content/spdx-license-list)
Bug 1018 - Proposal to add comments to all concrete classes - FIXED
(2.3, 3.3, 5.5, 6.11. 7.3 in spec)
Bug 1037 - Standard license properties are documented in RDF but not in the spec- FIXED (see class:License in Appendix II)

More info needed:
- Page 5: Section 1.3 minor word smithing - not spotting this change in the version attached to email feedback.


SPDX General Meeting this Thursday

Philip Odence
 

Two items before the meeting:

Here's the agenda for the face to face next Tuesday at LinuxCon. Note that a number of new folks have signed up so we have added an upfront overview of SPDX.

1-1:30  Introductions (Meet & Greet new participants)

1:30-2:30 SPDX Overview

2:30-3:00  SPDX 2.0 Overview (work-in-progress)

3:00-3:30  Break

3:30-5:30  SPDX Working Group

                                Mandatory field discussion (a.k.a. SPDX Lite)

                                2.0 Use Case Modeling


Anyone going to the LF Automotive Summit in the UK, Sept 19-20? We have an opportunity to speak about SPDX. Let me know. Thanks.


Meeting Time: Aug 23, 8am PST / 10 am CST / 11am EST / 15:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html

Conf call dial-in:
Conference code:  7812589502
Toll-free dial-in number (U.S. and Canada):  (877) 435-0230
International dial-in number: (253) 336-6732
For those dialing in from other regions, a list of toll free numbers can be found: 
https://www.intercallonline.com/portlets/scheduling/viewNumbers/viewNumber.do?ownerNumber=6053870&audioType=RP&viewGa=false&ga=OFF

 
Administrative Agenda
Attendance
Approve Minutes- 

Technical Team Report - Kate
Attempting to approve 1.1 spec as final.

Legal Team Report - Jilayne

Business Team Report – Jack/Scott

Cross Functional Issues
Website Update
Possibility of another F2F meeting after LinuxCon


Re: SPDX 1.1 Spec - ready to remove "DRAFT" designation?

Marc-Etienne Vargenau
 

Le 22/08/2012 15:40, VARGENAU, MARC-ETIENNE (MARC-ETIENNE) a écrit :
Le 22/08/2012 15:20, kate.stewart@... a écrit :
In the general meeting tomorrow, would like to survey folks to see if there are any reasons left why we can't remove the "DRAFT" designation, and declare the SPEC as 1.1.

Current DRAFT is at: http://www.spdx.org/system/files/spdx-1.1-rc20120822.pdf

If anyone spots any remaining issues, there is a .doc version of the draft at
http://www.spdx.org/wiki/spdx/specification. Please turn on change tracking and make the requested changes, then mail me a copy and I'll incorporate and publish another draft.

Last set of changes discussed in the Technical Working group have now been made, all open bugzilla Spec 1.1 targetted bugs have been incorporated, and TM --> (R) changes have been made.

Thanks, Kate

_______________________________________________
Spdx mailing list
Spdx@...
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx
Hello,

I have some blocking points.

I will send them ASAP.

Best regards,

Marc-Etienne Vargenau
Hello,

I moved some bugs present in both 1.0 and 1.1 to 1.1

Please fix them.

The total page number is wrong.

I would appreciate my name "Marc-Etienne Vargenau" be put in page 2.

Regards,

--
Marc-Etienne Vargenau
Alcatel-Lucent France, Route de Villejust, 91620 NOZAY, FRANCE
+33 (0)1 30 77 28 33, Marc-Etienne.Vargenau@...


Re: SPDX 1.1 Spec - ready to remove "DRAFT" designation?

Marc-Etienne Vargenau
 

Le 22/08/2012 15:20, kate.stewart@... a écrit :
In the general meeting tomorrow, would like to survey folks to see if there are any reasons left why we can't remove the "DRAFT" designation, and declare the SPEC as 1.1.

Current DRAFT is at: http://www.spdx.org/system/files/spdx-1.1-rc20120822.pdf

If anyone spots any remaining issues, there is a .doc version of the draft at
http://www.spdx.org/wiki/spdx/specification. Please turn on change tracking and make the requested changes, then mail me a copy and I'll incorporate and publish another draft.

Last set of changes discussed in the Technical Working group have now been made, all open bugzilla Spec 1.1 targetted bugs have been incorporated, and TM --> (R) changes have been made.

Thanks, Kate

_______________________________________________
Spdx mailing list
Spdx@...
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx
Hello,

I have some blocking points.

I will send them ASAP.

Best regards,

Marc-Etienne Vargenau

--
Marc-Etienne Vargenau
Alcatel-Lucent France, Route de Villejust, 91620 NOZAY, FRANCE
+33 (0)1 30 77 28 33, Marc-Etienne.Vargenau@...


SPDX 1.1 Spec - ready to remove "DRAFT" designation?

kate.stewart@...
 

In the general meeting tomorrow, would like to survey folks to see if there are any reasons left why we can't remove the "DRAFT" designation, and declare the SPEC as 1.1.

Current DRAFT is at: http://www.spdx.org/system/files/spdx-1.1-rc20120822.pdf

If anyone spots any remaining issues, there is a .doc version of the draft at
http://www.spdx.org/wiki/spdx/specification. Please turn on change tracking and make the requested changes, then mail me a copy and I'll incorporate and publish another draft.

Last set of changes discussed in the Technical Working group have now been made, all open bugzilla Spec 1.1 targetted bugs have been incorporated, and TM --> (R) changes have been made.

Thanks, Kate


Re: Planning for SPDX F2F mtg in Sept-Oct time frame - Details in wiki

Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...>
 

Hi Everyone,

Reminder #2 on signing up for F2F dates. 

Please visit http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 and let us know which proposed F2F mtgs dates you are able to attend (edit the bottom of the page and write down your name next to the dates you can make). 

This is not a promise at 100% you will be there as things can change with your plans, but it is a way to figure out which dates work for the most participants. 

Given the important of the items on the agenda, I am really hoping we can rally and get a F2F possible. I don't mind doing multiple calls to discuss these items, however, I have a strong believe that we won't progress as much or as fast as doing these discussion face to face over one or two days. 

Thanks,
Ibrahim 




On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...> wrote:
Hi Everyone,

I created a wiki page at http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 that covers agenda items for F2F in the next two months, proposed dates, etc.

I think it is critical to have this F2F for various reasons explained in the link above.

It would be great if you can please find 10 minutes in your schedule to review, post feedback, sign yourself up for dates you can attend, etc. 

Thank you,
Ibrahim 

--
Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D.
Director, Technology & Alliances
The Linux Foundation 





--
Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D.
Director, Technology & Alliances
The Linux Foundation 





--
Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D.
Director, Technology & Alliances
The Linux Foundation 
+1 (408) 893-1122
 


Re: Planning for SPDX F2F mtg in Sept-Oct time frame - Details in wiki

dmg
 

While I am not in the SF area, I will be happy to host a SPDX meeting
at the University of Victoria (where I work).
in Victoria (British Columbia). It is a beautiful location, and I
could easily provide (free) rooms where we hold the discussions.
It has an international airport, with direct flights from SF and
Seattle. It has Vancouver very close by too.

--daniel

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Ibrahim Haddad
<ibrahim@...> wrote:
Here's the link again - there may have been an error with the URL.

http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012


On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Ibrahim Haddad
<ibrahim@...> wrote:

Hi All,
Just a reminder to review and provide feedback on the agenda for the face
to face meeting (planned for oct/sept).
Also please sign your name on the dates you can attend the meeting.
Thank you,
Ibrahim


On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Ibrahim Haddad
<ibrahim@...> wrote:

Hi Everyone,

I created a wiki page at
http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 that
covers agenda items for F2F in the next two months, proposed dates, etc.

I think it is critical to have this F2F for various reasons explained in
the link above.

It would be great if you can please find 10 minutes in your schedule to
review, post feedback, sign yourself up for dates you can attend, etc.

Thank you,
Ibrahim

--
Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D.
Director, Technology & Alliances
The Linux Foundation
+1 (408) 893-1122
@IbrahimAtLinux



--
Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D.
Director, Technology & Alliances
The Linux Foundation
+1 (408) 893-1122
@IbrahimAtLinux



--
Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D.
Director, Technology & Alliances
The Linux Foundation
+1 (408) 893-1122
@IbrahimAtLinux



_______________________________________________
Spdx mailing list
Spdx@...
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx


--
--dmg

---
Daniel M. German
http://turingmachine.org


Re: Planning for SPDX F2F mtg in Sept-Oct time frame - Details in wiki

Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...>
 

Here's the link again - there may have been an error with the URL.

http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012


On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...> wrote:
Hi All,
Just a reminder to review and provide feedback on the agenda for the face to face meeting (planned for oct/sept). 
Also please sign your name on the dates you can attend the meeting.
Thank you,
Ibrahim


On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...> wrote:
Hi Everyone,

I created a wiki page at http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 that covers agenda items for F2F in the next two months, proposed dates, etc.

I think it is critical to have this F2F for various reasons explained in the link above.

It would be great if you can please find 10 minutes in your schedule to review, post feedback, sign yourself up for dates you can attend, etc. 

Thank you,
Ibrahim 

--
Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D.
Director, Technology & Alliances
The Linux Foundation 





--
Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D.
Director, Technology & Alliances
The Linux Foundation 





--
Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D.
Director, Technology & Alliances
The Linux Foundation 
+1 (408) 893-1122



Re: Planning for SPDX F2F mtg in Sept-Oct time frame - Details in wiki

Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...>
 

Hi All,
Just a reminder to review and provide feedback on the agenda for the face to face meeting (planned for oct/sept). 
Also please sign your name on the dates you can attend the meeting.
Thank you,
Ibrahim


On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...> wrote:
Hi Everyone,

I created a wiki page at http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 that covers agenda items for F2F in the next two months, proposed dates, etc.

I think it is critical to have this F2F for various reasons explained in the link above.

It would be great if you can please find 10 minutes in your schedule to review, post feedback, sign yourself up for dates you can attend, etc. 

Thank you,
Ibrahim 

--
Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D.
Director, Technology & Alliances
The Linux Foundation 





--
Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D.
Director, Technology & Alliances
The Linux Foundation 
+1 (408) 893-1122



Minutes for SPDX General Meeting on 9 Aug 2012

Manbeck, Jack
 

All,

 

Minutes for the meeting are posted here: http://www.spdx.org/wiki/20120809-general-meeting-minutes

 

Jack

 

 


From: spdx-bounces@... [mailto:spdx-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Philip Odence
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 4:17 PM
To: spdx@...
Subject: SPDX General Meeting Thursday

 

I have had an urgent trip arise and will be out of the office. Jack Manbeck has kindly offered to host. 

 

Also, with the new website, I have not been able to figure out how to post meeting minutes, so they are included at the bottom and I will migrate them to the website at a later date.

 

 

Meeting Time: Aug 9, 8am PST / 10 am CST / 11am EST / 15:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html


Conf call dial-in:
Conference code:  7812589502
Toll-free dial-in number (U.S. and Canada):  (877) 435-0230
International dial-in number: (253) 336-6732
For those dialing in from other regions, a list of toll free numbers can be found: 
https://www.intercallonline.com/portlets/scheduling/viewNumbers/viewNumber.do?ownerNumber=6053870&audioType=RP&viewGa=false&ga=OFF

 

 

Administrative Agenda

Attendance

Approve Minutes- SEE BELOW

 

Technical Team Report - Kate

Legal Team Report - Jilayne

Business Team Report – Jack/Scott

 

Cross Functional Issues

Website Update

 

 

Minutes from July 26 Meeting

 

Attendees:

Phil Odence, Black Duck

Ibrahim Haddad, Linux Foudnation

Pierre Lapointe, nexB

Kirsten Newcomer, Black Duck

Scott Lamons, HP

Adam Cohn, Cisco

Kamyer Emami, Protecode

Steve Cropper, Cisco

 

Ibrahim joined for the first time. He is in charge of technical and legal initiatives for the Linux Foundation and taken on the role of LF project coordinator for SPDX. He should be a big help.

 

Business Team Report

The panel discussion for LinuxCon will be lead by Scott and will include Kate, Jilayne and Jack representing respective teams. He's also recruited Matt Germonprez from U Nebraska to talk about his FOSSology/SPDX work.

Scott is working with LF on a press release about V1.1 to be released at LinuxCon.

 

Tech Team

Still working 2.0 use cases and trying to wrap up 1.1.

Face to Face will continue use case discussion.

 

Legal Team 

There has been discussion about how to recruit companies to get involved. And there's a sense that companies are concerned about commitment required to be involved with SPDX.

 

Website

Plan was to cut over to new site as of the 28th (and it was subsequently executed).

 


Planning for SPDX F2F mtg in Sept-Oct time frame - Details in wiki

Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...>
 

Hi Everyone,

I created a wiki page at http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 that covers agenda items for F2F in the next two months, proposed dates, etc.

I think it is critical to have this F2F for various reasons explained in the link above.

It would be great if you can please find 10 minutes in your schedule to review, post feedback, sign yourself up for dates you can attend, etc. 

Thank you,
Ibrahim 

--
Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D.
Director, Technology & Alliances
The Linux Foundation 
+1 (408) 893-1122



Re: SPDX F2F in September or October 2012

Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...>
 

Ed, I will add it. Thanks.

Can anyone please direct me to where I can create a wiki page to host the agenda items and where everyone else can add their agenda items too?

That wiki page will also hold the material I am working on for SPDX.

Thanks.
Ibrahim


On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...> wrote:
Please add the 2.0 use cases… 

Ed
On Aug 9, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...> wrote:

Hi All,

Here's some items that are worth setting up a F2F sometime in Sept or Oct:

a. Review current state of affairs for each sub-team
b. Current challenges, what are we doing about it, and how can we do better 
c. Review and discussion of governance model proposal 
d. Review of what needs to be done to get to SPDX 2.0
e. Division of work among available resources 
f. Planning deliverables and dates for remaining of 2012  
g. Finalize discussion on mission / goals / vision 
h. Decide on roadmap items tentatively for 2012-2013 (Ibrahim will propose)
i. Recruitment (companies - who and how to approach them with Ibrahim - etc) - also please provide list of companies to invite
j. SPDX presence at LF events and other important conferences
h.     Web site? (if not resolved by then)

Some of these may be redundant. But I think with that and with some other items you may have in mind, we have enough
to justify a 1 day F2F if not 1.5 days. 

I will be on travel 3rd and 4th week of Sept. So I am available on first 2 weeks of Sept or first week of Oct. 

Please consider.

Thanks,
Ibrahim

--
Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D.
Director, Technology & Alliances
The Linux Foundation 


_______________________________________________
Spdx mailing list
Spdx@...
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx




--
Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D.
Director, Technology & Alliances
The Linux Foundation 
+1 (408) 893-1122



Re: SPDX F2F in September or October 2012

Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...>
 

Please add the 2.0 use cases… 

Ed

On Aug 9, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...> wrote:

Hi All,

Here's some items that are worth setting up a F2F sometime in Sept or Oct:

a. Review current state of affairs for each sub-team
b. Current challenges, what are we doing about it, and how can we do better 
c. Review and discussion of governance model proposal 
d. Review of what needs to be done to get to SPDX 2.0
e. Division of work among available resources 
f. Planning deliverables and dates for remaining of 2012  
g. Finalize discussion on mission / goals / vision 
h. Decide on roadmap items tentatively for 2012-2013 (Ibrahim will propose)
i. Recruitment (companies - who and how to approach them with Ibrahim - etc) - also please provide list of companies to invite
j. SPDX presence at LF events and other important conferences
h.     Web site? (if not resolved by then)

Some of these may be redundant. But I think with that and with some other items you may have in mind, we have enough
to justify a 1 day F2F if not 1.5 days. 

I will be on travel 3rd and 4th week of Sept. So I am available on first 2 weeks of Sept or first week of Oct. 

Please consider.

Thanks,
Ibrahim

--
Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D.
Director, Technology & Alliances
The Linux Foundation 


_______________________________________________
Spdx mailing list
Spdx@...
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx


Linuxcon registration and workgroup meeting

Lamons, Scott (Open Source Program Office) <scott.lamons@...>
 

Here’s the link to register (or modify your existing registration)  for the upcoming Linuxcon in San Diego….     Per previous email from Jack we have a room reserved for an SPDX working group session on Tuesday afternoon.   As part of the registration you can indicate if you plan to attend the SPDX working session.   At this point we’re just trying to get a sense of who will attend so that we can formulate an appropriate agenda. 

 

 

Regards,

Scott Lamons

SPDX Business Team

 

 

Here is the link to the registration form - http://www.regonline.com/Register/Checkin.aspx?EventID=1032803

 

 

 

 

 

841 - 860 of 1590