spdx@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: New proposed field for project that a file came from

Thanks Kim, Will add it into the agenda to discuss tomorrow on the SPEC section. If anyone feels strongly about this field, and can't attend the call, please send email to the list so we have

By kate.stewart@... · #69 ·

Re: SPDX Agenda/Minutes

Hi Kim, Daniel, Use case I'm worried about is how do we say what MUST be recognized when all the licenses are on the web. What happens when we don't have a stable base set of "must recognize" to

By kate.stewart@... · #68 ·

Re: Decouple license list from the spec

+2 for decoupling the spec from the licenses. We need to be able to update the spec and the license list on different cycles. We should also anticipate that many orgs may want to keep a local copy

By Michael J Herzog <mjherzog@...> · #73 ·

New proposed field for project that a file came from

I would like to propose a new field in the file section. The field would be used to identify the OSS component/package that a file originated from. This is important since many packages will bundle

By Kim Weins · #67 ·

Re: SPDX Agenda/Minutes

Kim Weins said on Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 05:05:46PM -0600: Which in fact solves the point I had during the conf call this week. If the license is known to spdx, then we can point to a uri/url

By Bruno Cornec <Bruno.Cornec@...> · #66 ·

Re: SPDX Agenda/Minutes

I also agree that we should decouple spec from licenses. We need a way to add licenses without having to rev the spec. Otherwise we will get lots of spec revisions or very few license updates. I

By Kim Weins · #65 ·

Re: SPDX Agenda/Minutes

From the minutes: Our implicit path had tied a fixed license list of licenses to the spec rev, but JohnE put forth an impassioned argument as to why they should be decouples... I throw my support

By dmg · #64 ·

SPDX Agenda/Minutes

Per discussion late meeting, agendas will be going out in bodies of emails and minutes will go out as links to archive at spdx.org. I'll strive to get minutes out a week in advance, though I'm behind

By Philip Odence · #63 ·

Re: Issue tracking

The Linux Foundation has a Bugzilla instance that we should be able to use. * Peter Williams <peter.williams@...> [2010-09-07 16:25]: -- Martin Michlmayr Open Source Program Office,

By Martin Michlmayr · #62 ·

Issue tracking

Now that the technical sub-group has initiated its work i think it would be worth having a issue tracking system. This would allow us to reliably track issues with the spec and to make sure nothing

By Peter Williams <peter.williams@...> · #61 ·

Re: SPDX RDF 'sub-group' meeting Tues Sept 7 invitation details

Hello, I may be able to attend the last half-hour of the talk, if my previous conf call with my partner doesn't extend to much :-(. Bruno. kate.stewart@... said on Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at

By Bruno Cornec <Bruno.Cornec@...> · #60 ·

Re: anybody has been successful at using Ninka?

hi! It was not entirely trivial to get it working: the documentation and the actual names of files and patches are not in sync, so it cost me about 10 minutes to get everything working (I will send

By Armijn Hemel <armijn@...> · #59 ·

Re: SPDX RDF 'sub-group' meeting Tues Sept 7 invitation details

Hi Bill, I can attend, and want to be considered part of the working group. Thanks, Kate

By kate.stewart@... · #57 ·

anybody has been successful at using Ninka?

hi everybody, Is anybody being successful at building and using ninka? So far I have not heard from anybody (neither good or bad news). Based on feedback we are planning to make a wider

By dmg · #58 ·

SPDX RDF 'sub-group' meeting Tues Sept 7 invitation details

Anyone is welcome; Gary, Jeff, Peter have accepted. Details below. SDPX RDF Sub-group Mtg 1 Tuesday Sept 7, 11AM eastern time Toll-free dial-in number (U.S. and Canada): (877) 435-0230 International

By Bill Schineller · #56 ·

Re: shout out re: SPDX RDF 'sub-group'

Tuesday 11AM eastern (8AM pacific) works for me. Gary

By Gary O'Neall · #55 ·

Re: shout out re: SPDX RDF 'sub-group'

This will work for me. Jeff

By Jeff Luszcz · #54 ·

shout out re: SPDX RDF 'sub-group'

SPDX colleagues: As per the last con-call, here's a shout out to those who wish to collaborate outside of the current bi-weekly calls to focus on the details of the RDF representation of an SPDX

By Bill Schineller · #53 ·

Re: CeCILL licences

Bonjour Patrick, CeCILL licenses have been mentioned before by others as well, so unless someone objects I'll just add them to the next draft with some of the others that have been discussed and

By kate.stewart@... · #52 ·

Re: Spdx Digest, Vol 1, Issue 16

Provided that we still go with the license text repository, what about something like a "diff"-standard for exceptions and variations of the standard licenses? (i.e. a standardized syntax describing

By Soeren_Rabenstein@... · #51 ·

1621 - 1640 of 1690

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms