spdx@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Hi Bob, Scott, Jilayne, Armijn, Office) <scott.lamons@...> wrote: We (as in Ninka) decided to consider this a (GPLv2 | GPLv3-KDEupgradeClause). It can also be considered: (GPLv2 | GPLv3

By dmg · #390 ·

Re: license name question

Because KDE e.V. is a German non-profit and its members like to have endless meetings ;-) Kidding aside, this license change came a few years ago because they went through a lot of pain when they

By Armijn Hemel <armijn@...> · #389 ·

Re: license name question

This is the way I read it as well. However I don't know why they wouldn't just license it under GPLv2 or GPLv3 and eliminate the "or (at your option) any later version..." which seems completely

By Lamons, Scott (Open Source Program Office) <scott.lamons@...> · #388 ·

Re: license name question

doh! Thank you and Armijn for straightening me out. So would a reasonable license name be "GPL-2+-KDE" ? Bob Gobeille

By Bob Gobeille · #387 ·

Re: license name question

This would be GPL-2+ - as it's really just describing GPL v2 or later. THere is no GPL v2.1 (that would be LGPL v2.1, I know, confusing!) As for the KDE exception - the notice reads to me that KDE is

By Jilayne Lovejoy <jilayne.lovejoy@...> · #385 ·

Re: license name question

I've never heard of GPLv2.1, but if you mean LGPLv2.1, the KDE project has a similar license for that too. Basically this license says: "KDE e.V. currently only approves GPLv2 or GPLv3, but if the

By Armijn Hemel <armijn@...> · #386 ·

license name question

I just ran into the following license. It is GPL v2 or GPL v3+ KDE exception. Note the absence of GPLv2.1. If 2.1 was included, the name would be GPL-2+-with-KDE-exception, but since it isn't,

By Bob Gobeille · #384 ·

Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)

Firefox diagnostics are misleading here. We have https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655661 for this. The SPDX pages are served with mime-type application/xml, but entities are used that are

By Juergen Weigert <jw@...> · #383 ·

Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011

Ciaran Farrell <cfarrell@...> wrote: ... I am not sure who manages this page, but http://spdx.org/licenses/ISC and some others cannot be displayed on my firefox as they give a xml parsing

By Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@...> · #382 ·

Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011

Ciaran Kate Stewart is the Chair of SPDX and represents Canonical on this. I have asked her to respond to this and would be pleased if you could please keep both of us on the thread. All the

By Amanda Brock <amanda.brock@...> · #381 ·

Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011

Hi, before LinuxTag 2011 I sent around invitations to this workshop "Cross Distribution Licensing Summit": http://is.gd/7GF9Ar (linuxtag.org) Some of you indicated that you would not be able to

By Ciaran Farrell · #380 ·

Typo 'Nauman' in spreadsheet

Hi SPDX-team! I just downloaded spdx_lienelist_v1.11.ods and spotted this Naumen Public License Nauman http://www.opensource.org/licenses/naumen.php I figure the short name should say

By Juergen Weigert <jw@...> · #379 ·

Agenda for Thursday SPDX General Meeting

Meeting Time: May 19, 8am PDT / 10 am CDT / 11am EDT / 15:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html Conf call dial-in: Conference code: 7812589502 Toll-free dial-in number

By Philip Odence · #378 ·

Re: Question on SampleRDF

Hi Peter, Thanks for the clarifications. I am going to have a closer look at it again. I might have been working on a slightly outdated version of your specification though. When reading through, I

By Mario Tokarz <mario@...> · #377 ·

Re: Question on SampleRDF

Hi Mario, Thanks so much for reviewing these documents. This sort of feedback is very helpful. It might also be useful to look at <http://spdx.org/rdf/terms>. This is the formal OWL ontology for

By Peter Williams <peter.williams@...> · #376 ·

Re: Question on SampleRDF

Hi Gary, short correction: The latter one should be 'licenseDeclared', containing a reference to "rdf:nodeID=A8" in the sample. Best, Mario

By Mario Tokarz <mario@...> · #375 ·

Question on SampleRDF

Hello Gary, I am just reading into the SPDX sample you offered for download. I have two questions (I read the sample in connection with SPDX Version Draft 20110411). 1. In

By Mario Tokarz <mario@...> · #374 ·

SPDX Mini Webinar

At the Linux Foundation's behest, we recorded a ~3 minute, mini-webinar giving an overview of SPDX: http://www.blackducksoftware.com/spdx/intro_to_spdx.mov There is a link to it from the SPDX home

By Philip Odence · #373 ·

Spreadsheet and tools

Attached is a sample SPDX spreadsheet. This isn’t a full analysis (the files list is quite abbreviated), but it should give you a good idea of the format and structure. Please let me know any

By Gary O'Neall · #372 ·

Re: Agenda for Thursday SPDX General Meeting

Hi Phil I’m going to be late for the call. Here’s my update in case I’m not there. Beta kickoffs are slated to start next week. Need to validate that all is ready on the technical side and

By Kim Weins · #371 ·

1301 - 1320 of 1690

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms