spdx@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Here's another update on the mailing list numbers: spdx: 105 spdz-biz: 21 spdx-legal: 29 spdx-tech: 26 -- Martin Michlmayr Open Source Program Office, Hewlett-Packard

By Martin Michlmayr · #410 ·

SPDX as description for binary deliverables containing OSS artifacts

Hi everyone, this is a spin off of a discussion I was having with Peter and Garry on the tech mailing list. I am considering how SPDX could form the basis for the following example use

By Mario Tokarz <mario@...> · #409 ·

Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)

Yes, I have added this to my list of updates for the next license list spreadsheet version. This also makes me wonder if there are other "older" licenses that were OSI certified and I may have

By Jilayne Lovejoy <jilayne.lovejoy@...> · #408 ·

Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)

I will make sure the appropriate change is included in the next version of the license list spreadsheet, which should be relatively soon! Jilayne Jilayne Lovejoy | Corporate

By Jilayne Lovejoy <jilayne.lovejoy@...> · #407 ·

Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)

I added 2 bugs in bugzilla: - Bug 811 -Produce an archive of license texts for SPDX licenses - Bug 812 -Add a column to the index of licenses to indicate if a license is OSI

By Gary O'Neall · #406 ·

Thursday SPDX General Meeting Reminder and Agenda.

I have a conflict and will not be able to join, however Kirsten will do a fine job chairing in my absence.. Meeting Time: June 2, 8am PDT / 10 am CDT / 11am EDT / 15:00 UTC.

By Philip Odence · #405 ·

Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)

agreed. -- Motorola Inc. E.A. Rockett Senior Counsel Software, Applications & Digital Content Licensing (408)541-6703 (O) (408)541-6900 (F) (415)508-7625 (M) rockett@...

By Esteban Rockett <mgia3940@...> · #404 ·

Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)

Hi Martin, it will also help to have a simple tar file with all the licenses, each in its own file, and without the HTML tagging. Basically, the actual text of the license. --dmg --

By dmg · #403 ·

Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)

Jilayne - lets discuss at your convinence. (today if possible) Rockett

By Esteban Rockett <mgia3940@...> · #402 ·

Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)

* Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@...> [2011-05-26 10:25]: Jilayne, are you the right person to take care of this? Gary, is this something you can add to your tool? -- Martin

By Martin Michlmayr · #401 ·

OSI adopts SPDX short names

See my blog post on the subject: http://www.spdx.org/content/celebrate-small-victories-and-cheers-open-source-initiative

By Philip Odence · #400 ·

Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)

Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...> wrote: Thank you! BTW: Could you add a OSI tag to http://spdx.org/licenses/CPL-1.0? This license is superceeded but it is used for the korn shell and other AT&T

By Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@...> · #399 ·

Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)

* Gary O'Neall <gary@...> [2011-05-25 18:05]: I've put the update in place now. However, the issues pointed out by Juergen and Joerg are different to the known issue. I've fixed

By Martin Michlmayr · #398 ·

Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011

[ adding Debian relevant people for DEP5 & preserving all extra needed Cc:-s mentioned in the thread thus far (I hope :)) ] Agreed, of course. A small clarification is needed here. Actually DEP5

By Stefano Zacchiroli <leader@...> · #397 ·

Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)

http://spdx.org/licenses/ISC and error. Confirming this problem for Firefox 4.0.1

By Soeren_Rabenstein@... · #396 ·

Re: license name question

First, let me be a pain in the neck and suggest we should move this discussion to the spdx-legal list. We've committed to limiting this general list to more summary information and less real work. My

By Philip Odence · #393 ·

Re: license name question

I brought this up because it is a new signature in FOSSology and I'd like the name to be as close to the SPDX guidelines as possible. I really like Daniel's method of identifying disjunctive

By Bob Gobeille · #392 ·

Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)

Hi Juergen, Thanks for pointing out the errors. I believe this is a known encoding error which should be fixed when we next update the licenses. This will be fixed on the next update. We don't

By Gary O'Neall · #395 ·

Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011

Hello, Ciaran Farrell said on Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:35:01PM +0200: Just for completion (and maybe discussion with them), I attended a session at the latest Solutions Linux in Paris, where a project

By Bruno Cornec <Bruno.Cornec@...> · #394 ·

Re: license name question

Daniel, et al. By "KDEupgradeClause" you are referring to the previous posts re: KDE reserving the right to decide on post-v3 versions of GPL as well, is that right? I suppose from the standpoint of

By Jilayne Lovejoy <jilayne.lovejoy@...> · #391 ·

1281 - 1300 of 1690

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms