spdx@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: Ninka, and SPDX On the linux kernel and BSD licenses

<kate.stewart@...> wrote: I am not in that mailing list. It would be of great help if somebody help me with the analysis of the non-matching license files, while I concentrate on adding

By dmg · #430 ·

Re: Ninka, and SPDX On the linux kernel and BSD licenses

Daniel These seem like examples of the things we may want to "templatize" in the standard licenses. Those efforts have been delayed behind other items. The legal team can speak to these specific

By Kim Weins · #429 ·

Re: Ninka, and SPDX On the linux kernel and BSD licenses

Hi Daniel, Lets move this thread to the SPDX legal subgroup discussion list. Since I think we'll need them to comment on the issues. To my eyes, yes those sentence fragments look basically

By Kate Stewart <kate.stewart@...> · #428 ·

Ninka, and SPDX On the linux kernel and BSD licenses

Hi Everybody, I started implementing SPDX licenses in Ninka. I started with the BSDs (4, 3 and 2). My goal is to try to 'SPDX' the kernel before LinuxCon. Of the files that Ninka is properly

By dmg · #427 ·

Re: updating Ninka to output SPDX licenses

I would say, yes. Jilayne

By Jilayne Lovejoy <jilayne.lovejoy@...> · #426 ·

updating Ninka to output SPDX licenses

I have a question regarding when text matches a license. I am curious how should I interpret optional quotes around some text. In particular, the BSD-4 includes this text: This product includes

By dmg · #425 ·

Question on DRAFT 20110605 (package cardinality/verification)

Hi all, I have two questions regarding the latest spec from your home page. Thanks in advance for the time and consideration. 1.) Page 10 states that "A package can contain subpackages". How

By Mario Tokarz <mario@...> · #424 ·

SPDX web site review

Hi all, The website refresh team has put together a proposed information map for the SPDX web site refresh initiative. The map can be found here: http://spdx.org/wiki/spdx-web-site-mind-maps We’ll

By Kirsten Newcomer · #423 ·

Re: A face-to-face meeting in Vancouver?

Hi Daniel Since we will be launching SPDX at LinuxCOn Vancouver, we are also planning to schedule a BOF to discuss SPDX. I may have an extra pass for you -- I think we get 5 with our sponsorship and

By Kim Weins · #422 ·

optional effective license of a package.

hi everybody, We (the research team I am part of, which includes Armijn) have being building a method/tool to identify dependencies in binaries by observing the build process. One of the test cases

By dmg · #421 ·

A face-to-face meeting in Vancouver?

Hi everybody, Is there any plan to have a face-to-face meeting in Vancouver during LinuxCon? For me it is very close, so I'll be interested in doing so, even informally. I am probably not going to

By dmg · #420 ·

FOSSBazaar/SPDX server upgraded

I performed a system upgrade (Debian 5.0 to 6.0) on the server hosting FOSSBazaar and SPDX. If you notice and problems with the web site or mailing lists, please let me know. -- Martin

By Martin Michlmayr · #419 ·

Agenda for Thursday General Meeting

Meeting Time: June 30, 8am PDT / 10 am CDT / 11am EDT / 15:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html Conf call dial-in: Conference code: 7812589502 Toll-free dial-in number

By Philip Odence · #418 ·

SPDX Beta Feedback (and Web Site Redesign)

9:00 AM - 10:30 AM July 7, 2011 Location: See below This replaces our biz team meeting on this day. We'd like participation from tech and legal teams to. First hour will be Beta feedback Last half

By Kim Weins · #417 ·

Cancelled: SPDX Business (Rollout) Call 11ET/8PT

We will replace this meeting with Beta feedback meeting for this one date. Kim ----- US 866-740-1260 Int'l http://www.readytalk.com/support/international-numbers.php ID 2404502 Web

By Kim Weins · #416 ·

SPDX Beta Feedback Meeting on Jul 7

Hi all We will have a call to review all of the SPDX Beta feedback on Jul 7 at 11 ET/8PT. We will try to get all of the Beta participants on the call. In advance of the call, we will try to get

By Kim Weins · #415 ·

Updated Invitation: SPDX Legal Workstream Call 11ET/10CT/8PT @ Wed Jun 22 8am - 9am (spdx@fossbazaar.org)

This event has been changed. more details » SPDX Legal Workstream Call 11ET/10CT/8PT Changed: All: Due to the Linux Foundation Member Counsel Meeting, I am moving this to next week Many

By Esteban Rockett <mgia3940@...> · #414 ·

Thursday SPDX General Meeting

Apologies, but once again, I have a conflict and will not be able to join, however Kirsten will (once again) do a fine job chairing in my absence. In addition to reviewing the minutes from the last

By Philip Odence · #413 ·

License Field Discussion

There have been multiple discussions in different working groups about the nomenclature, meaning and intent of the package license fields. To ensure we are all on the right page, we want ot have some

By Philip Odence · #412 ·

Beyond copyright/licensing ?

Hi. (I'm new here, so pardon me if this is some kind of FAQ.) The SPDX acronym looks quite general, and the charter doesn't seem to limit itself to licensing/copyright matters. However, looking at

By Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@...> · #411 ·

1261 - 1280 of 1690

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms