spdx@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: Logistics for visitors to the Bay Area getting to the SPDX Forum on April 6

There is the Caltrain. From Union Square it's a long-ish walk to the train station or you can take a quick cab ride. There is light rail in San Jose that goes right up Tasman drive by Cisco. I'll

By Kim Weins · #552 ·

Re: Logistics for visitors to the Bay Area getting to the SPDX Forum on April 6

Caltrain is great! http://www.caltrain.com/schedules.html. I defer to someone else on how far away Cisco is located. Mark F. Radcliffe Partner DLA Piper US LLP 2000 University Avenue East Palo

By Mark Radcliffe · #549 ·

Re: Logistics for visitors to the Bay Area getting to the SPDX Forum on April 6

Take Caltrain from San Francisco, then transfer to VTA Light Rail ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VTA_light_rail ), get out at Cisco Way ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cisco_Way_%28VTA%29 ),

By Armijn Hemel <armijn@...> · #548 ·

Re: Logistics for visitors to the Bay Area getting to the SPDX Forum on April 6

To my knowledge, there are trains from SF to San Jose that are pretty direct during rush hour (little less than an hour). I'm not familiar with how far it is from the train station to Cisco's campus,

By Jilayne Lovejoy <jilayne.lovejoy@...> · #547 ·

Re: Logistics for visitors to the Bay Area getting to the SPDX Forum on April 6

Philippe and me will be in the same situation No idea up to now about the best solution. -- Guillaume ROUSSEAU Antelink, Open Source Gouvernance Architects http://www.antelink.com/

By guillaume.rousseau@antelink.com · #546 ·

Logistics for visitors to the Bay Area getting to the SPDX Forum on April 6

Hopefully this isn't an inappropriate usage of this mailing list... Two of us from Digium will be coming to the Bay Area to participate in the LF Collaboration Summit and SPDX events. We'll be

By Kevin P. Fleming <kpfleming@...> · #545 ·

Re: SPDX at Collaboration Summit

Kevin, you are approved so please go ahead and book your travel. Amanda

By Amanda McPherson <amanda@...> · #544 ·

Re: SPDX at Collaboration Summit

Amanda Can you approve Kevin sooner rather than later? Kim Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless

By Kim Weins · #543 ·

Re: SPDX at Collaboration Summit

I have just requested an invitation, as has our in-house counsel, and we're really looking forward to getting involved in the SPDX effort. However, I noticed that the response to my invitation

By Kevin P. Fleming <kpfleming@...> · #542 ·

SPDX at Collaboration Summit

The schedule for the Collaboration Summit is available now: https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/collaboration-summit/schedule The SPDX working group session will be on Thursday. There's also

By Martin Michlmayr · #541 ·

Today's SPDX General Meeting

Save the Dates: We will have a working meeting at the Linux Collab Summit in San Francisco, April 4-5 There will also be an SPDX event at Cisco in San Jose, April 6. The purpose will be outreach and

By Philip Odence · #540 ·

Re: Recommend Changing SPDX License Identifier for Eclipse PublicLicense 1.0 to "Eclipse-1.0"

Oh, so _you're_ the guys to blame for people calling the license "Eclipse"! That explains everything. (just kidding)

By Mike Milinkovich · #539 ·

Re: Recommend Changing SPDX License Identifier for Eclipse PublicLicense 1.0 to "Eclipse-1.0"

FWIW, Fossology uses Eclipse_v1.0 but I think EPL works as well and folks would get use to it over time. My primary question/concern is the effect of changes like this on backward compatibility and

By Lamons, Scott (Open Source Program Office) <scott.lamons@...> · #538 ·

Re: Recommend Changing SPDX License Identifier for Eclipse PublicLicense 1.0 to "Eclipse-1.0"

I had no idea we were such troublemakers!

By Mike Milinkovich · #537 ·

Re: Recommend Changing SPDX License Identifier for Eclipse PublicLicense 1.0 to "Eclipse-1.0"

Just as an amusing followup, today I was on an email thread where someone referred to the EPL as "an Eclipse license". But I think that must reflect the person's relative lack of familiarity with

By Richard Fontana · #536 ·

Info on SPDX participation at LF Collab Summit (April 3-5)

Hi all, Here are the details that are shaping up for the Collab Summit. The schedule is not finalized, so there could be some changes, but here is what we know as of now. We will have an SPDX

By Kim Weins · #535 ·

Re: Recommend Changing SPDX License Identifier for Eclipse PublicLicense 1.0 to "Eclipse-1.0"

YES! Thanks for the plug, Tom. Indeed, it would be great to have more voices on a more regular basis. The next legal workstream call is this coming Wednesday at 8am PT/ 11am ET We will be

By Jilayne Lovejoy <jilayne.lovejoy@...> · #534 ·

Re: LF SPDX link broken

Thanks, Scott. I've informed the LF. * Scott Lamons <scott.lamons@...> [2012-03-01 01:52]: -- Martin Michlmayr Open Source Program Office, Hewlett-Packard

By Martin Michlmayr · #533 ·

Re: Recommend Changing SPDX License Identifier for Eclipse PublicLicense 1.0 to "Eclipse-1.0"

Thanks all, your replies are truly appreciated. I withdraw the request to change the License identifier for the Eclipse Public License from EPL-1.0 to Eclipse-1.0. Separately, we are looking for

By Tom Incorvia · #530 ·

Re: Recommend Changing SPDX License Identifier for Eclipse PublicLicense 1.0 to "Eclipse-1.0"

I've only ever heard it referenced as the EPL.

By Ed Warnicke (eaw) <eaw@...> · #529 ·

1141 - 1160 of 1690

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms