|
Agenda for Thursday meeting (legal issues)
I just posted the agenda for the legal work stream topics for Thursday's face-to-face meeting at the Linux Foundation Collab Summit.
Please review before coming, so we can use our time efficiently to
I just posted the agenda for the legal work stream topics for Thursday's face-to-face meeting at the Linux Foundation Collab Summit.
Please review before coming, so we can use our time efficiently to
|
By
Jilayne Lovejoy <jilayne.lovejoy@...>
·
#582
·
|
|
SPDX- Cancelled General Meeting this week. Collaboration Summit SPDX Agenda
As many of us will be at the Linux Collaboration Summit, this week's general meeting is cancelled.
Attached is a summary of the SPDX-related activities going on at the Summit and an agenda for our
As many of us will be at the Linux Collaboration Summit, this week's general meeting is cancelled.
Attached is a summary of the SPDX-related activities going on at the Summit and an agenda for our
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#581
·
|
|
Re: curious about the use of (R) and TM symbols
I will discuss with Phil and get back to the the list-serv.
I will discuss with Phil and get back to the the list-serv.
|
By
Esteban Rockett <mgia3940@...>
·
#580
·
|
|
Re: Today's SPDX Call
Added
4. Discuss use cases 1.x does solve.
Added
4. Discuss use cases 1.x does solve.
|
By
Esteban Rockett <mgia3940@...>
·
#579
·
|
|
Re: Today's SPDX Call
Steve,
This sounds really good to me. My only minor comment is that we should mostly focus on the objectives and use cases around 2.x and 3.x and not get too caught up on the timeline just yet.
Steve,
This sounds really good to me. My only minor comment is that we should mostly focus on the objectives and use cases around 2.x and 3.x and not get too caught up on the timeline just yet.
|
By
Lamons, Scott (Open Source Program Office) <scott.lamons@...>
·
#578
·
|
|
Re: Today's SPDX Call
Folks:
Many thanks to those of you who participated in today’smeeting. I wanted to send out the wrap up next steps that I proposed and getfeedback incase I missed, or misstated something.
Folks:
Many thanks to those of you who participated in today’smeeting. I wanted to send out the wrap up next steps that I proposed and getfeedback incase I missed, or misstated something.
|
By
Steve Cropper (stcroppe) <stcroppe@...>
·
#577
·
|
|
Re: Today's SPDX Call
Thanks Phil:
I have attached a couple of slides for our input to thediscussion.
Steve
Thanks Phil:
I have attached a couple of slides for our input to thediscussion.
Steve
|
By
Steve Cropper (stcroppe) <stcroppe@...>
·
#576
·
|
|
Today's SPDX Call
Sorry for the excessive email of late, but it comes of our prepping for the upcoming Collaboration Summit and SPDX Forum.
Attached are a couple of slides to help us frame today's call.
Phil
L.
Sorry for the excessive email of late, but it comes of our prepping for the upcoming Collaboration Summit and SPDX Forum.
Attached are a couple of slides to help us frame today's call.
Phil
L.
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#575
·
|
|
Re: curious about the use of (R) and TM symbols
Daniel,
Interesting you should ask, I just pinged Esteban for an update on this
earlier in the week. He and Motorola were pursuing on behalf of the Linux
Foundation (the holder of the marks). As of
Daniel,
Interesting you should ask, I just pinged Esteban for an update on this
earlier in the week. He and Motorola were pursuing on behalf of the Linux
Foundation (the holder of the marks). As of
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#574
·
|
|
curious about the use of (R) and TM symbols
Hi everybody,
I am curious, why if "SPDX" is a registered trademark in the US (I just
checked--not in canada, by the way) then there is the requirement to
postfix it with "TM" and not with (R) as is
Hi everybody,
I am curious, why if "SPDX" is a registered trademark in the US (I just
checked--not in canada, by the way) then there is the requirement to
postfix it with "TM" and not with (R) as is
|
By
dmg
·
#573
·
|
|
variants of licenses
Hi everybody,
my colleague Yuki Manabe, from the Univ. of Osaka, has been working hard
trying to extract all the licenses in every program of every package in
various Linux distributions (using
Hi everybody,
my colleague Yuki Manabe, from the Univ. of Osaka, has been working hard
trying to extract all the licenses in every program of every package in
various Linux distributions (using
|
By
dmg
·
#572
·
|
|
SPDX 2.0 Use Cases
Over in spdx-tech this week, we started making use cases more precise and specific for
SPDX 2.0:
http://spdx.org/wiki/spdx-20-use-cases
Some of the 1.0 ones needs to be refreshed, and there may be
Over in spdx-tech this week, we started making use cases more precise and specific for
SPDX 2.0:
http://spdx.org/wiki/spdx-20-use-cases
Some of the 1.0 ones needs to be refreshed, and there may be
|
By
Ed Warnicke <eaw@...>
·
#571
·
|
|
Re: Special SPDX Adoption Meeting on Thursday - PLEASE READ
All,
I will be travelling on business this Thursday. I apologize in advance for having to miss this meeting.
Regards,
Jack Manbeck
Texas Instruments
www.ti.com
Main: (301)
All,
I will be travelling on business this Thursday. I apologize in advance for having to miss this meeting.
Regards,
Jack Manbeck
Texas Instruments
www.ti.com
Main: (301)
|
By
Manbeck, Jack
·
#570
·
|
|
Someone to present SPDX at LSM/RMLL in Geneva (July 2012) ?
Hi.
I think it could be interesting if someone could present SPDX at the
coming Libre Software Meeting in Geneva in July 2012.
More details at
Hi.
I think it could be interesting if someone could present SPDX at the
coming Libre Software Meeting in Geneva in July 2012.
More details at
|
By
Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@...>
·
#569
·
|
|
Re: proselytizing the License List
Good one, Jilayne. Not sure everyone caught this one I did last Spring. http://www.spdx.org/content/celebrate-small-victories-and-cheers-open-source-initiative
From: Jilayne Lovejoy
Good one, Jilayne. Not sure everyone caught this one I did last Spring. http://www.spdx.org/content/celebrate-small-victories-and-cheers-open-source-initiative
From: Jilayne Lovejoy
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#568
·
|
|
proselytizing the License List
I was due to post a blog entry, so thought I'd take the opportunity to do a little proselytizing
I was due to post a blog entry, so thought I'd take the opportunity to do a little proselytizing
|
By
Jilayne Lovejoy <jilayne.lovejoy@...>
·
#567
·
|
|
Special SPDX Adoption Meeting on Thursday - PLEASE READ
Just talked to Phil and he asked me to to clarify, meeting is on THURSDAY, not Wednesday as in original title. Apologies for the confusion.
Kate
Just talked to Phil and he asked me to to clarify, meeting is on THURSDAY, not Wednesday as in original title. Apologies for the confusion.
Kate
|
By
kate.stewart@...
·
#566
·
|
|
Re: Special SPDX Adoption Meeting on Wednesday - PLEASE READ
This message's subject says Wednesday, but the content says Thursday.
--
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: kfleming@... | SIP: kpfleming@... |
This message's subject says Wednesday, but the content says Thursday.
--
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: kfleming@... | SIP: kpfleming@... |
|
By
Kevin P. Fleming <kpfleming@...>
·
#565
·
|
|
Special SPDX Adoption Meeting on Wednesday - PLEASE READ
IMPORTANT
Kim is out next week, so in the time normally reserved for the Business Team meeting, we will have a dedicated discussion about an important topic that came up in the General Meeting:
IMPORTANT
Kim is out next week, so in the time normally reserved for the Business Team meeting, we will have a dedicated discussion about an important topic that came up in the General Meeting:
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#564
·
|
|
SIGN UP NOW for SPDX Forum if you are planning to attend
We already have 37 registrants — including quite a few people that have not been normal participants. Everyone needs to register so that we can get a full count for food and the
We already have 37 registrants — including quite a few people that have not been normal participants. Everyone needs to register so that we can get a full count for food and the
|
By
Kim Weins
·
#563
·
|