|
Re: Problem with PackageSourceInfo
Hi Marc-Etienne,
Thanks for catching these.
The property name is rdfs:comment for Review.
I went ahead and submitted bug 1046 to fix the spec.
For 1.1, there is also a web page with the rdf terms
Hi Marc-Etienne,
Thanks for catching these.
The property name is rdfs:comment for Review.
I went ahead and submitted bug 1046 to fix the spec.
For 1.1, there is also a web page with the rdf terms
|
By
Gary O'Neall
·
#619
·
|
|
Re: Problem with PackageSourceInfo
Sorry, the Subject of the message should read
"Problem with Review Comments"
--
Marc-Etienne Vargenau
Alcatel-Lucent France, Route de Villejust, 91620 NOZAY, FRANCE
+33 (0)1 30 77 28 33,
Sorry, the Subject of the message should read
"Problem with Review Comments"
--
Marc-Etienne Vargenau
Alcatel-Lucent France, Route de Villejust, 91620 NOZAY, FRANCE
+33 (0)1 30 77 28 33,
|
By
Marc-Etienne Vargenau
·
#618
·
|
|
Problem with PackageSourceInfo
Hello,
In the SPDX 1.0 and spdx-1.1-rc20120403.pdf I read:
7.3.6 RDF: property spdx:comment in class spdx:Review
Example:
<Review>
<rdfs:comment>
All of the licenses seen in the file, are matching
Hello,
In the SPDX 1.0 and spdx-1.1-rc20120403.pdf I read:
7.3.6 RDF: property spdx:comment in class spdx:Review
Example:
<Review>
<rdfs:comment>
All of the licenses seen in the file, are matching
|
By
Marc-Etienne Vargenau
·
#617
·
|
|
Problem with PackageSourceInfo
Hello,
In the SPDX 1.0 and spdx-1.1-rc20120403.pdf I read:
4.9.4 Data Format: free form text that can span multiple lines.
In tag format this is delimited by <text> .. </text>.
4.9.5 Tag:
Hello,
In the SPDX 1.0 and spdx-1.1-rc20120403.pdf I read:
4.9.4 Data Format: free form text that can span multiple lines.
In tag format this is delimited by <text> .. </text>.
4.9.5 Tag:
|
By
Marc-Etienne Vargenau
·
#616
·
|
|
Re: Comments in SPDX files
Hello Kate,
It's done. Bugs 1040 and 1041.
Best regards,
Marc-Etienne
--
Marc-Etienne Vargenau
Alcatel-Lucent France, Route de Villejust, 91620 NOZAY, FRANCE
+33 (0)1 30 77 28 33,
Hello Kate,
It's done. Bugs 1040 and 1041.
Best regards,
Marc-Etienne
--
Marc-Etienne Vargenau
Alcatel-Lucent France, Route de Villejust, 91620 NOZAY, FRANCE
+33 (0)1 30 77 28 33,
|
By
Marc-Etienne Vargenau
·
#615
·
|
|
Re: Comments in SPDX files
Hello Marc-Etienne,
Good catch. Looks like you've got two bugs there, one against the translation tool, and one against the spec.
Please file the bugs from https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org,
Hello Marc-Etienne,
Good catch. Looks like you've got two bugs there, one against the translation tool, and one against the spec.
Please file the bugs from https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org,
|
By
kate.stewart@...
·
#614
·
|
|
Comments in SPDX files
Hello,
I have questions regarding the syntax of comments in an SPDX
file in tag format.
From the examples, it seems that ## starts a comment.
For example:
## Creation Information
But I do not see
Hello,
I have questions regarding the syntax of comments in an SPDX
file in tag format.
From the examples, it seems that ## starts a comment.
For example:
## Creation Information
But I do not see
|
By
Marc-Etienne Vargenau
·
#613
·
|
|
FW: May 31 General Meeting Minutes - IMPORTANT
Arrgggh.
Sorry for the volume. In my earlier note, I provided the wrong link for the Biz Team work looking to be reviewed.
Use this one:
http://spdx.org/wiki/spdx-vision-mission
From: Michael Herzog
Arrgggh.
Sorry for the volume. In my earlier note, I provided the wrong link for the Biz Team work looking to be reviewed.
Use this one:
http://spdx.org/wiki/spdx-vision-mission
From: Michael Herzog
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#612
·
|
|
May 31 General Meeting Minutes - IMPORTANT
Please take the time to review Legal Team description and License List description as well as Mission/Vision work from Business Team.
Attendance: 10
May 17 minutes approved
Legal Team Report
Please take the time to review Legal Team description and License List description as well as Mission/Vision work from Business Team.
Attendance: 10
May 17 minutes approved
Legal Team Report
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#611
·
|
|
Improvements in the SPDX examples
Hello,
I suggest the following improvements in the SPDX examples.
They could be included in the final 1.1 spec.
In 4.1.6
replace
<name>glibc 2.11.1</name>
with
<name>glibc</name>
In
Hello,
I suggest the following improvements in the SPDX examples.
They could be included in the final 1.1 spec.
In 4.1.6
replace
<name>glibc 2.11.1</name>
with
<name>glibc</name>
In
|
By
Marc-Etienne Vargenau
·
#610
·
|
|
Minutes from last SPDX General Meeting
All,
I neglected to include the minutes from the last meeting in my reminder email.
First order of business is to approve.
http://www.spdx.org/wiki/20120517-general-meeting-minutes
Phil
All,
I neglected to include the minutes from the last meeting in my reminder email.
First order of business is to approve.
http://www.spdx.org/wiki/20120517-general-meeting-minutes
Phil
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#609
·
|
|
Today's SPDX general Meeting
> Excuse the late notice. I am traveling. Normal time/ normal agenda today.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> Excuse the late notice. I am traveling. Normal time/ normal agenda today.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#607
·
|
|
Today's SPDX general Meeting
Excuse the late notice. I am traveling. Normal time/ normal agenda today.
Excuse the late notice. I am traveling. Normal time/ normal agenda today.
|
By
Phil Odence <podence@...>
·
#608
·
|
|
Re: Questions on SPDX 1.0
Thanks Marc - I corrected the tools page per your message below.
In terms of case sensitive - I don't recall any discussion on this relative
to the entire file. I know that some of the specific
Thanks Marc - I corrected the tools page per your message below.
In terms of case sensitive - I don't recall any discussion on this relative
to the entire file. I know that some of the specific
|
By
Gary O'Neall
·
#606
·
|
|
Re: Questions on SPDX 1.0
Hello Gary,
Thank you for your quick answer.
Responses inline also.
I had overlooked this page.
In page http://spdx.org/tools I would replace
"Rdf to XMLversion 0.9.6" by "Rdf to HTMLversion
Hello Gary,
Thank you for your quick answer.
Responses inline also.
I had overlooked this page.
In page http://spdx.org/tools I would replace
"Rdf to XMLversion 0.9.6" by "Rdf to HTMLversion
|
By
Marc-Etienne Vargenau
·
#605
·
|
|
Re: Questions on SPDX 1.0
Hi Marc-Etienne,
Responses inline below
Gary
Hi Marc-Etienne,
Responses inline below
Gary
|
By
Gary O'Neall
·
#604
·
|
|
Questions on SPDX 1.0
Hello,
I am trying to understand the SPDX 1.0 spec so that I can
export our FOSS database in SPDX format.
I have the following questions:
The are two formats, one in text and one in XML/RDF.
1) Is
Hello,
I am trying to understand the SPDX 1.0 spec so that I can
export our FOSS database in SPDX format.
I have the following questions:
The are two formats, one in text and one in XML/RDF.
1) Is
|
By
Marc-Etienne Vargenau
·
#603
·
|
|
Use cases to consider for 2.0 - input due this week.
Hi,
Just a reminder to get any use cases you want considered for 2.0 to
be added to the wiki pages this week [1]. Template example to be filled
out can be found in those with active links, for
Hi,
Just a reminder to get any use cases you want considered for 2.0 to
be added to the wiki pages this week [1]. Template example to be filled
out can be found in those with active links, for
|
By
Kate Stewart <kate.stewart@...>
·
#602
·
|
|
MInutes from SPDX General Meeting
I don't always send out minutes (generally include link in next meeting reminders), but there are some important discussions in play, so I thought it would make sense to get them out sooner and not
I don't always send out minutes (generally include link in next meeting reminders), but there are some important discussions in play, so I thought it would make sense to get them out sooner and not
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#601
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for tomorrow's legal work group call
Thanks Jilayne. I may need to miss the legal workstream due to mandatory day-job meeting, but will try to dial in late.
Regarding the SPDX License List description: in the sentence, “The SPDX
Thanks Jilayne. I may need to miss the legal workstream due to mandatory day-job meeting, but will try to dial in late.
Regarding the SPDX License List description: in the sentence, “The SPDX
|
By
Tom Incorvia
·
#600
·
|