spdx@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

SPDX F2F in September or October 2012

Hi All, Here's some items that are worth setting up a F2F sometime in Sept or Oct: a. Review current state of affairs for each sub-team b. Current challenges, what are we doing about it, and how can

By Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...> · #730 ·

SPDX General Meeting Thursday

I have had an urgent trip arise and will be out of the office. Jack Manbeck has kindly offered to host. Also, with the new website, I have not been able to figure out how to post meeting minutes, so

By Philip Odence · #729 ·

Re: SPDX Booth at LinuxCon NA

Hi Jilayne, I have cleared the spreadsheet from last year and attached to this email. You can reuse it for people to sign up for the booth this year. -- Regards, Pierre ----- Pierre Lapointe - +1

By Pierre Lapointe <plapointe@...> · #728 ·

Re: SPDX Booth at LinuxCon NA

Sorry for an additional email on this. I was mistaken below. We actually need to deliver the layout / booth info to the venue tonight. It would be great if you can confirm by eod if you need the

By Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...> · #727 ·

Re: SPDX Booth at LinuxCon NA

Hi Jilayne, When I was on the general call I believe there were discussions about that and I did some pull inside to rearrange how things are setup. So now we have a space for SPDX. I need a

By Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...> · #726 ·

Re: SPDX Booth at LinuxCon NA

Hi Ibrahim, I believe we had a booth last year at LinuxCon and people signed up for time slots to staff it. However, I was not there, so I can't speak to the specifics. Seems like a good idea to me

By Jilayne Lovejoy <jilayne.lovejoy@...> · #725 ·

SPDX Booth at LinuxCon NA

Hi All, We have been reviewing our booth space for LinuxCon NA and there is a possibility to provide SPDX WG with a standard table top. Would that work? Please confirm asap so we can plan for it.

By Ibrahim Haddad <ibrahim@...> · #724 ·

Today's SPDX General Meeting

Apologies, but I seem to have misplaced my notes from the last meeting and never posted the minutes. I'm truly baffled as I am generally pretty well organized along this dimension. Meeting Time:

By Philip Odence · #723 ·

Minutes from July 19 SPDX Business Team Meeting

Attendees: Scott Lamons (host) Gary O'Neall Kamyar Emami Phil Odence Pierre Lapointe Michael Herzog Jilayne Lovejoy Steve Cropper (joined later) Agenda/Notes 1. Linuxcon (Panel, Working

By Lamons, Scott (Open Source Program Office) <scott.lamons@...> · #722 ·

Re: Possible reasons new licenses aren't submitted

Jilayne Lovejoy wrote at 20:48 (PDT) on Wednesday: Thanks! -- -- bkuhn

By Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@...> · #721 ·

Re: Possible reasons new licenses aren't submitted

It already did actually say this, but the wording was a bit awkward and the email address was not hyper-linked, so I have fixed both. Jilayne >

By Jilayne Lovejoy <jilayne.lovejoy@...> · #720 ·

Re: Possible reasons new licenses aren't submitted

I wrote: Jilayne Lovejoy wrote at 13:04 (PDT) on Friday: Can you show me examples of software packages that use GPLv2-only-with-GCC-Exception? I'm amazed to learn that there's a package that uses it.

By Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@...> · #719 ·

Re: Possible reasons new licenses aren't submitted (was Re: Minutes from July 12 SPDX General Meeting)

If there is no url, then there is no url - just state this. However, in this scenario, I would simply include the two you mention above. The field need not have only one url (e.g. For licenses that

By Jilayne Lovejoy <jilayne.lovejoy@...> · #718 ·

Possible reasons new licenses aren't submitted (was Re: Minutes from July 12 SPDX General Meeting)

Philip Odence wrote at 11:52 (EDT) on Thursday: FWIW, I looked at this possibility briefly. Upon reading http://spdx.org/wiki/spdx-license-list-process-requesting-new-licenses-be-added I came to the

By Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@...> · #717 ·

Minutes from July 12 SPDX General Meeting

http://www.spdx.org/wiki/20120712-general-meeting-minutes Attendance: 7 Technical Team Report - Kate 2.0 work Still working through use cases 1.1 work Still under revision but near

By Philip Odence · #716 ·

Today SPDX General Meeting Reminder

Apologies, but I seem to have misplaced my notes from the last meeting and never posted the minutes. I'm truly baffled as I am generally pretty well organized along this dimension. Meeting Time:

By Philip Odence · #715 ·

Re: "Scope" of licenses to be covered by SPDX

Great, Bradley. When I find someone who will *do* that work, we will definitely ask for you input! - Jilayne

By Jilayne Lovejoy <jilayne.lovejoy@...> · #714 ·

Re: "Scope" of licenses to be covered by SPDX

<peter.williams@...> wrote: Agreed. In this general forum we've heard that the existing SPDX license list approach does not meet the needs of Linux distributions (in the case I raised,

By Peter A. Bigot · #713 ·

Re: "Scope" of licenses to be covered by SPDX

Is that really the best choice? This issue seems to be cross functional issue in that it concerns both the license list and the technical details of representing license data in SPDX files (and in the

By Peter Williams <peter.williams@...> · #712 ·

Re: "Scope" of licenses to be covered by SPDX

Polite request: Could we shift this discussion off of the General Meeting list and onto the Legal Team list only? TThis is GREAT discussion for the legal team. This is not a big problem, but I want to

By Philip Odence · #711 ·

961 - 980 of 1690

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms