http://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2013-05-02 Next meeting: Aug 1

hi everybody, if you use ninka, this might be useful to you. With the help of Armijn i have been cleaning up some regressions and improved some licenses. The new code is now in the github

Recognizing that Thursday is a holiday in the US, we will run the meeting at the normal time, but on Wednesday. NOTE: In as part of the business team report, Phil will do a quick review of the survey

When: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 11:00 AM-12:00 PM. (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)Where: Bridge info enclosed*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* As the 4th is a holiday in the US, will do the call on July 3,

NOTE:In as part of the business team report, Phil will do a quick review of the survey results. In advance of the meeting, download the docs at the bottom of this

Hi Michel I think the "Official Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) Dictionary" http://nvd.nist.gov/cpe.cfm is a good starting point for this topic. another source to consider is ISO/IEC 19770 all

hi, This is not my experience at all. In the Binary Analysis Tool I use fingerprinting using string constants, function names, variable names, and so on, and I can reliably tell versions of binaries

I am currently a senior systems engineer at Nokia, and I can say without reservation that we face this problem also, identifying specific versions of software (binaries as well as sources).

Dear all we are facing a very difficult issue: How to identify uniquely Software. In Alcatel-Lucent (ALU) we would like to link all our databases on SW (FOSS SW, proprietary SW, FOSS SW coming in

The survey is still open. If you haven't responded, please do: www.spdx.org/survey http://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2013-05-02

Announcements Summary of very successful Collaboration Summit (also appended at the bottom) HELP WITH THE SURVEY (please please please) Meeting Time: Thursday, May 2, 8am PST / 10 am CST / 11am EST /

Here's some great news about the website and a request for your help with the SPDX survey. WEBSITE I am pleased to tell you that http://spdx.org/ has been upgraded with a new, superior underlying

New wiki looks great. Scott: ++1 there's a need. Jack: I'm thinking we should request one. Media wiki syntax while not difficult may seem bizarre to some people? Scott: yes!

* Marc-Etienne Vargenau <Marc-Etienne.Vargenau@...> [2013-04-11 15:48]: Yeah, I know. I also sent a request to the LF. You can email me directly in the meantime. -- Martin

Hello, The e-mail address wiki@... given in page http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Getting_started to request an account does not seem to work. Best regards, Marc-Etienne -- Marc-Etienne Vargenau

I glossed over the Getting Started link. Would it make sense to display it as "Getting Started Using this Wiki"? Jack

New wiki looks great. there's a need. Jack: I'm thinking we should request one. Media wiki syntax while not difficult may seem bizarre to some people? Jack: Attachments seem necessary so I

* Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...> [2013-03-11 16:28]: Still a problem. In fact, the attachment extension is quite buggy, so I'd like to remove it. Comments have been migrated in the

The wiki has been migrated to a proper wiki using MediaWiki. All content (including past revisions) has been migrated. You can find the new wiki at http://wiki.spdx.org/view/ Here's a "Getting

Hi all, Um, my name is Edo Shor and I'm from the White Source R&D team. Thank you for all the efforts in putting together the SPDX spec. We believe it is a certain step towards a better, open sourced,