Hi Oliver, Indeed, Phil is right - all are welcome! In addition to the link Phil included below, there is also this page explaining when/how the license list inclusion guidelines came about:

Oliver, There are a number of people on the Legal Team who are not lawyers. We would welcome your participation. Best, Phil From: "Fendt, Oliver" <oliver.fendt@...> Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 10:27:21

Hi Phil, thanks that would really help. If it is not a requirement to be a lawyer, then I will be happy to participate in the legal team, as well as in the technical team. You are right the time

Thank you for the clarification Oliver. This kind of feedback it very helpful. We try out best to lay out the inclusion criteria here: http://spdx.org/spdx-license-list/license-list-overview Also,

Hi all, sorry for not being able to participate yesterday in the conf call. I want to comment on one topic of the last minutes. The topic is: “ o Mikael delivered a workshop at

Appologies, have a work conflict today and not able to join in. Technical team activities: - work continues on spec. Have resolved out file types, file usage portions. - decision made to not

GENERAL MEETING Meeting Time: Thurs, July 3, 8am PDT / 10 am CDT / 11am EDT / 15:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html Conf call dial-in: Conference code:

Sorry for the late reminder. GENERAL MEETING Meeting Time: Thurs, June 5, 8am PDT / 10 am CDT / 11am EDT / 15:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html Conf call

Next meeting is June 5 at the normal time. (11EDT) http://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2014-05-01 General Meeting/Minutes/2014-05-01 < General Meeting | Minutes Jump to: navigation,

Hi Richard (x2)! Richard H - great to hear you are using the SPDX License List for identifying licenses in AppStream for a number of reasons. Your responses below are all correct in terms of

So, for AppStream the idea is to explain the licenses in the user-facing software center, e.g. gnome-software or apper for KDE. This would mean you could click on a link that says "GPLv3+" and

I think the problem is that you are dealing with three different notions of license identifiers, two of which are superficially the same in that AppStream has decided to use SPDX identifiers for its

Richard, I¹m moving you from the general SPDX list to the legal team. We are actually in the middle of marching through the Fedora licenses and are happy to work with you on this. You should be

Hi all, I hope I'm asking in the right place, if not please disregard this message. When writing AppStream metadata I'm required to convert the existing Fedora license tag to an SPDX-compatible

REMINDER – Call for talks GENERAL MEETING Meeting Time: Thurs, May 1, 8am PDT / 10 am CDT / 11am EDT / 15:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html Conf call

Although LinuxCon NA is a few months off (Chicago, Aug 20) we are just one week from the deadline for submitting talks (May 2). “SPDX” is specifically mentioned under suggested topics, and we

Nick, While I've only spent ~15min with the tool, I was very impressed with the ease of use and the ability to install this and get almost immediate and useful! results. Great work! I'll keep

Hi Jack, I'd like to follow-up on this message if possible, the points from the requirement list were quoted to place my answers in context. Checked. Checked. Community. Contributions from

Gary, Thanks for the great presentation today on SPDX 2.0 modeling. I really like the evolutionary approach (i.e. adding the relationship functionality on top of what’s already in the 1.2 spec

Greetings all. Attached are a few slides I'll use to go over the SPDX 2.0 approach and model on tomorrow's call. In the tech team we are starting to transition from working on the model to the