Hello all, Many thanks to all of you for your feedback and comments on this topic. Sebastian, thank you especially for investigating this and for your efforts looking into Jitsi hosting. I'm pleased

Feel free to do this. So you know, the room I set up[1] is just available whenever anyone wants to use it. I have it set up so that everyone who joins can be a moderator (my schedule is such that I'll

~ Sebastian [2021-04-12 16:38 +0200]: Great idea to ask Fosshost for tech sponsoring! Good comparison. BBB and Jitsi are really different. From our experience at the FSFE, BBB is rather for fixed

Dear James, First off, I've got great news: Fosshost have accepted my application for SPDX hosting! I have been informed that we are now on their queue. It's probable that new DNS records will need

On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 20:16 +0100, Sebastian wrote: [...] > > > I'd suggest that Jitsi is more appropriate for our use than BBB > > > (Jitsi is a more flexible platform), > > > > I don't quite agree

Dear James, That Jitsi server is indeed available for our use; it's sort of the demo server for 8x8's enterprise Jitsi integration. However, that instance's terms of use limits the number of

What's wrong with just using https://meet.jit.si ? It's the Jitsi project free server available to anyone without a prior reservation or appointment. I don't quite agree with this statement, but

Dear all, Here's the update that Jilayne said was on its way! During the week I've applied for Jitsi hosting for our meetings; so far I am still awaiting responses. I am expecting to receive one

While I'm sorry I've been unable to participate in SPDX working groups as of late, I'd be happy to offer Conservancy's BBB instance for these meetings. I set up a room so that any of you can try it

Hi all, I pasted Sebastian's original message, which was in an attached .txt file, into the email body below for convenience here. To follow-up on this: We have been using Uberconference for the

Hi all, As per some discussion on the general call today, the FAQ page on the website is in dire need of a refresh. https://spdx.dev/faq/ The legal team has made a copy of the text of the license

Minutes from Feb for approval today: https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2021-03-04 Thanks for your patience, Phil L. Philip Odence General Manager, Black Duck Audit

No special presentation this month, so the meeting will likely not run the full hour. Note: The plan is still to move this meeting to Zoom, but we are still working out details with the Linux

Cheers, Sebastian, welcome. From:spdx@... <spdx@...> on behalf of Sebastian <seabass-labrax@...> Date: Friday, March 26, 2021 at 9:18 AM To: SPDX Mailing List <spdx@...> Subject: [spdx]

Dear all on the SPDX mailing list, Since I've just joined this list, I am writing now to introduce myself! I'm Sebastian Crane, hailing from Britain. I like software, and I like standards: a

Steve Winslow will present: A Proof-of-concept for Generating an SPDX SBoM for CMake-based Projects. I will discuss an experiment with leveraging the CMake file-based APIs to automatically create

Hi all, This message from Santiago bounced, which is a good reminder for all newcomers that you will want to join the spdx-general mailing list, and probably the spdx-tech mailing list (for tech team

Exciting indeed! Looking forward to this! -Santiago

An exciting development! As you may know, there have been a handful of groups working on standardizing SBOMs. Kate and Gary have been working closely with the 3T SBOM group for some time. Our