Minutes from Feb for approval today: https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2021-03-04 Thanks for your patience, Phil L. Philip Odence General Manager, Black Duck Audit

No special presentation this month, so the meeting will likely not run the full hour. Note: The plan is still to move this meeting to Zoom, but we are still working out details with the Linux

Cheers, Sebastian, welcome. From:spdx@... <spdx@...> on behalf of Sebastian <seabass-labrax@...> Date: Friday, March 26, 2021 at 9:18 AM To: SPDX Mailing List <spdx@...> Subject: [spdx]

Dear all on the SPDX mailing list, Since I've just joined this list, I am writing now to introduce myself! I'm Sebastian Crane, hailing from Britain. I like software, and I like standards: a

Steve Winslow will present: A Proof-of-concept for Generating an SPDX SBoM for CMake-based Projects. I will discuss an experiment with leveraging the CMake file-based APIs to automatically create

Hi all, This message from Santiago bounced, which is a good reminder for all newcomers that you will want to join the spdx-general mailing list, and probably the spdx-tech mailing list (for tech team

Exciting indeed! Looking forward to this! -Santiago

An exciting development! As you may know, there have been a handful of groups working on standardizing SBOMs. Kate and Gary have been working closely with the 3T SBOM group for some time. Our

Thank you for your kind support Kate-san ! Best regards, Kentaro Takahashi

Thanks for sending this Takahashi-san. I'm forwarding this email for discussion on the spdx-tech mailing list where the usage profile will be discussed. spdx-tech is where we are discussing the

Dear members, We are in the license information exchange sub group under OpenChain Japan WG, and would like to propose usage profile for SPDX3.0 on this mailing list based on Kate's suggestion as

Moving this from spdx general list to spdx-tech list. Greetings Stephanie, If you are referring to an external SPDX document, you will want to use the ExternalSpdxDocument rather than

Hi Alan, Your Firefox extension works really well. Thanks for this great tool! Best, Till Am 14.01.21 um 22:26 schrieb Alan Tse:

I'm glad this topic came up, because I hadn't heard of spdx-license-diff before, and now I have it installed. That's a pretty good start to a Friday! Thanks, Alan! steve

Thanks, and I see it’s already done. Now I need to see why my tool isn’t matching it. ..m

Hi Mark, I’m also not sure of which SPDX tool you were using but I checked with the browser extensionspdx-license-diff and I get a template match to MIT since the extra part is optional as

Hi Mark, The MIT license template on the license list [1] has the language "(including the next paragraph)" as optional text, which is why that part shows up in blue italics on the list [2]. I think

The "X.org Preferred License" documented at [ https://www.x.org/archive/current/doc/xorg-docs/License.html ] is the MIT license with the additional text in the middle "(including the

HelloJ I am currently working on an issue in the Oss-Review-Toolkit [1] to support referring to external SPDX files from a `project.spdx.yml` [2]. I am currently checking out the spdx-specs