|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
I just realized that the DocFest will be demonstrating interoperability of an ISO standard SBOM.
Great timing getting the ISO standard status before the 9/16 DocFest. Very cool!
Thanks,
Dick
I just realized that the DocFest will be demonstrating interoperability of an ISO standard SBOM.
Great timing getting the ISO standard status before the 9/16 DocFest. Very cool!
Thanks,
Dick
|
By
Dick Brooks
·
#1442
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
Please do 🙂
By
Shane Coughlan
·
#1441
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
This is great news, very happy to see it and kudos to everyone involved.
People may also be interested to know that we just merged SPDX SBOM generation
into OpenEmbedded-Core, just before our feature
This is great news, very happy to see it and kudos to everyone involved.
People may also be interested to know that we just merged SPDX SBOM generation
into OpenEmbedded-Core, just before our feature
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#1440
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
We may quote you on that!
From:spdx@... <spdx@...> on behalf of Shane Coughlan <scoughlan@...>
Date: Thursday, September 9, 2021 at 9:16 PM
To: spdx@... <spdx@...>
Subject: Re: [spdx] SPDX Goes
We may quote you on that!
From:spdx@... <spdx@...> on behalf of Shane Coughlan <scoughlan@...>
Date: Thursday, September 9, 2021 at 9:16 PM
To: spdx@... <spdx@...>
Subject: Re: [spdx] SPDX Goes
|
By
Phil Odence
·
#1439
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
Seconded!
This is tremendously important for the governance ecosystem.
Regards
Shane
Seconded!
This is tremendously important for the governance ecosystem.
Regards
Shane
|
By
Shane Coughlan
·
#1438
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
A truly amazing achievement – well done and congratulations to Kate and the entire SPDX and Linux Foundation community that made this happen.
So much looking forward to advancing SPDX
A truly amazing achievement – well done and congratulations to Kate and the entire SPDX and Linux Foundation community that made this happen.
So much looking forward to advancing SPDX
|
By
Dick Brooks
·
#1437
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Goes ISO
A big +1 from me. Thank you to all the SPDX contributors and everyone involved in the years-long process of getting the SPDX standard to where it is today, and especially to Kate for her tireless
A big +1 from me. Thank you to all the SPDX contributors and everyone involved in the years-long process of getting the SPDX standard to where it is today, and especially to Kate for her tireless
|
By
Steve Winslow
·
#1436
·
|
|
SPDX Goes ISO
I’m pleased to announce that SPDX is now ISO/IEC 5962:2021.
Many people have worked hard over the last decade to get us to this point. Big credit goes to my Steering Committee colleagues who
I’m pleased to announce that SPDX is now ISO/IEC 5962:2021.
Many people have worked hard over the last decade to get us to this point. Big credit goes to my Steering Committee colleagues who
|
By
Phil Odence
·
#1435
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Sept General Meeting Minutes & Announcement
Thanks, Phil.
Will there be a press release of some sort? And at what point will the project be ready to start accepting member companies?
Asking for a friend…
--V
--
VM (Vicky)
Thanks, Phil.
Will there be a press release of some sort? And at what point will the project be ready to start accepting member companies?
Asking for a friend…
--V
--
VM (Vicky)
|
By
VM (Vicky) Brasseur
·
#1434
·
|
|
SPDX Sept General Meeting Minutes & Announcement
SPDX Community,
Minutes: https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2021-09-02
As you are aware, in last week’s meeting we discussed a proposal to change the SPDX workgroup’s
SPDX Community,
Minutes: https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2021-09-02
As you are aware, in last week’s meeting we discussed a proposal to change the SPDX workgroup’s
|
By
Phil Odence
·
#1433
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Thursday General Meeting Reminder - SPECIAL MEETING
Thanks, Sebastian for your thoughts, support and understanding.
Regarding licensing, my sense was that your desire to make the spec easy to publish is covered by the proposed licensing scheme.
Thanks, Sebastian for your thoughts, support and understanding.
Regarding licensing, my sense was that your desire to make the spec easy to publish is covered by the proposed licensing scheme.
|
By
Phil Odence
·
#1432
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Thursday General Meeting Reminder - SPECIAL MEETING
Dear all,
During today's General Meeting, in which the Core Team presented a
proposal to improve the governance of SPDX, I brought up a few
suggestions to the current proposal. Going into the meeting
Dear all,
During today's General Meeting, in which the Core Team presented a
proposal to improve the governance of SPDX, I brought up a few
suggestions to the current proposal. Going into the meeting
|
By
Sebastian Crane
·
#1431
·
|
|
SPDX Thursday General Meeting Reminder - SPECIAL MEETING
We will deviate from our usual standing agenda for this special meeting. We will start with a presentation from a Google Summer of Code student (see topic below) and then will pick up the discussion
We will deviate from our usual standing agenda for this special meeting. We will start with a presentation from a Google Summer of Code student (see topic below) and then will pick up the discussion
|
By
Phil Odence
·
#1430
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Governance Next Steps
Thanks Richard and Jilayne!
Yes, in other cases we've seen one LF project become a member of another, for purposes of showing support and furthering collaboration between the projects' communities. In
Thanks Richard and Jilayne!
Yes, in other cases we've seen one LF project become a member of another, for purposes of showing support and furthering collaboration between the projects' communities. In
|
By
Steve Winslow
·
#1429
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Governance Next Steps
Hi Richard,
I love your forward thinking! First we have to have the review and acceptance of the proposal. Assuming that goes through and as to whether the Yocto Project could
Hi Richard,
I love your forward thinking! First we have to have the review and acceptance of the proposal. Assuming that goes through and as to whether the Yocto Project could
|
By
J Lovejoy
·
#1428
·
|
|
Re: SPDX Governance Next Steps
FWIW I've been wondering how we could show a relationship between Yocto Project
and SPDX as we are a strong support of it so this looks timely in that regard
assuming we'd be eligible as an associate
FWIW I've been wondering how we could show a relationship between Yocto Project
and SPDX as we are a strong support of it so this looks timely in that regard
assuming we'd be eligible as an associate
|
By
Richard Purdie
·
#1427
·
|
|
SPDX Governance Next Steps
SPDX Community,
As previewed in the June General Meeting, the Core Team has submitted a proposal for changing the governance of SPDX. The reasoning for the change and substance are the same as what
SPDX Community,
As previewed in the June General Meeting, the Core Team has submitted a proposal for changing the governance of SPDX. The reasoning for the change and substance are the same as what
|
By
Phil Odence
·
#1426
·
|
|
SPDX DocFest - Sept 16, 2021 - Call for Participation
As a follow-up to this morning SPDX general meeting, below is the information on the upcoming SPDX DocFest:
The SPDX project will be hosting an initial working "DocFest" to bring together the
As a follow-up to this morning SPDX general meeting, below is the information on the upcoming SPDX DocFest:
The SPDX project will be hosting an initial working "DocFest" to bring together the
|
By
Gary O'Neall
·
#1425
·
|
|
Thursday's SPDX General Meeting/ Google Summer of Code Presentations
This week’s meeting with feature two GSoC presentations. Note I have a conflict so Gary will host.
PLEASE: When you sign in, please include your name and company (or put them in the chat) to
This week’s meeting with feature two GSoC presentations. Note I have a conflict so Gary will host.
PLEASE: When you sign in, please include your name and company (or put them in the chat) to
|
By
Phil Odence
·
#1424
·
|
|
[openchain] OpenChain Third Monday Webinar - 2021-06-21 - 14:00 UTC / 07:00 PST / 15:00 BST / 16:00 CEST / 19:30 IST / 22:00 CST / 23:00 KST / 23:00 JST: SBOM Challenges in Unstructured Projects + Case Study: Readiness Assessment for OpenChain ISO 5230
We are covering SBOMs today, so perhaps of interest :)
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Shane Coughlan via lists.openchainproject.org" <scoughlan=linuxfoundation.org@...>
Subject: [openchain]
We are covering SBOMs today, so perhaps of interest :)
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Shane Coughlan via lists.openchainproject.org" <scoughlan=linuxfoundation.org@...>
Subject: [openchain]
|
By
Shane Coughlan
·
#1423
·
|