Robert, I'm glad to hear that and thanks for your kind words. Your question is an interesting one and it is not a use case that we may have specifically solved yet in that we don't have a field that

Robert, Thanks for your message and joining the list. You pose an interesting scenario! While the SPDX is typically provided with the corresponding code I suspect there might be some way that this

All, As a follow up on our actions the web re-vamp team has been and continues to work to improve the quality of our website. You may already have noticed a few changes. Our initial focus has been

Thanks for a great discussion on spdx its got me interested in wrapping spdx into my current release activities as a release manager. Say for example I ship an SDK and for a customer to use this SDK

The SPDX team is proud to announces that the 1.1 version of the specification is now available, and replaces 1.0 as the current recommended version to work from. The 1.1 version of the specification

Thank you for the comments, all change requests received to date have been made in DRAFT 20120826, available at: http://www.spdx.org/wiki/spdx/specification Please let me know you spot any other

Hi. I had sent messages about ADMS.FOSS (old name) / ADMS.SW (new name) in the past, so here's a bit of followup. FYI, the ADMS.SW 1.0 specifications [0] reuses some bits from SPDX : ADMS.SW

Jennifer Cloer (Linux Foundation PR) and I are finalizing a press release for SPDX 1.1 which will be very similar in structure to what we did forSPDX 1.0 last year. This is scheduled to hit the

Meeting Minutes: http://spdx.org/wiki/20120823-general-meeting-minutes Notice: We are trying to finalize the 1.1 spec. Tonight Kate is working through a handful of known typos in this version.

Hi All, As follow up to this morning's call, please sign up to the F2F possible date here: http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 (add your name / location to the

Hi All, It looks the F2F for Sept or Oct is gaining some steam with more people signing up as able to attend. Please see: http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 If you

Thank you to everyone who submitted comments and bugs. :) The bugzilla bugs with the spec itself, targetted to 1.1, are now all resolved, and written comments provided so far by email have been

Two items before the meeting: Meeting Time: Aug 23, 8am PST / 10 am CST / 11am EST / 15:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html Conf call dial-in: Conference code:

Hello, I moved some bugs present in both 1.0 and 1.1 to 1.1 Please fix them. The total page number is wrong. I would appreciate my name "Marc-Etienne Vargenau" be put in page 2. Regards, --

Hello, I have some blocking points. I will send them ASAP. Best regards, Marc-Etienne Vargenau -- Marc-Etienne Vargenau Alcatel-Lucent France, Route de Villejust, 91620 NOZAY, FRANCE +33 (0)1 30

In the general meeting tomorrow, would like to survey folks to see if there are any reasons left why we can't remove the "DRAFT" designation, and declare the SPEC as 1.1. Current DRAFT is at:

Hi Everyone, Reminder #2 on signing up for F2F dates. Please visit http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 and let us know which proposed F2F mtgs dates you are able to

While I am not in the SF area, I will be happy to host a SPDX meeting at the University of Victoria (where I work). in Victoria (British Columbia). It is a beautiful location, and I could easily

Here's the link again - there may have been an error with the URL. http://spdx.org/wiki/planning-face-face-meeting-september-october-2012 -- Ibrahim Haddad, Ph.D. Director, Technology & Alliances The

Hi All, Just a reminder to review and provide feedback on the agenda for the face to face meeting (planned for oct/sept). Also please sign your name on the dates you can attend the meeting. Thank