Date   
Re: New proposed field for project that a file came from By kate.stewart@... · #69 ·
Re: SPDX Agenda/Minutes By kate.stewart@... · #68 ·
Re: Decouple license list from the spec By Michael J Herzog <mjherzog@...> · #73 ·
New proposed field for project that a file came from By Kim Weins · #67 ·
Re: SPDX Agenda/Minutes By Bruno Cornec <Bruno.Cornec@...> · #66 ·
Re: SPDX Agenda/Minutes By Kim Weins · #65 ·
Re: SPDX Agenda/Minutes By dmg · #64 ·
SPDX Agenda/Minutes By Philip Odence · #63 ·
Re: Issue tracking By Martin Michlmayr · #62 ·
Issue tracking By Peter Williams <peter.williams@...> · #61 ·
Re: SPDX RDF 'sub-group' meeting Tues Sept 7 invitation details By Bruno Cornec <Bruno.Cornec@...> · #60 ·
Re: anybody has been successful at using Ninka? By Armijn Hemel <armijn@...> · #59 ·
Re: SPDX RDF 'sub-group' meeting Tues Sept 7 invitation details By kate.stewart@... · #57 ·
anybody has been successful at using Ninka? By dmg · #58 ·
SPDX RDF 'sub-group' meeting Tues Sept 7 invitation details By Bill Schineller · #56 ·
Re: shout out re: SPDX RDF 'sub-group' By Gary O'Neall · #55 ·
Re: shout out re: SPDX RDF 'sub-group' By Jeff Luszcz · #54 ·
shout out re: SPDX RDF 'sub-group' By Bill Schineller · #53 ·
Re: CeCILL licences By kate.stewart@... · #52 ·
Re: Spdx Digest, Vol 1, Issue 16 By Soeren_Rabenstein@... · #51 ·
1521 - 1540 of 1590