Hi all Here is the preso Mark Radcliffe is doing tomorrow. It's designed to set the stage on OSS compliance. Kim From: "Radcliffe, Mark" <Mark.Radcliffe@...> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 00:18:09 -0700 To:

OK, we'll plan on being here at 8:30 tomorrow. -- Kevin P. Fleming Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies Jabber: kfleming@... | SIP: kpfleming@... | Skype: kpfleming 445 Jan

It is actually a very full day. The afternoon technical sesson which starts at 1:30 (also contrary to the Collab Summit published schedule) will run right up to 5:30 (at which point everyone will

This agenda shows activities starting at 8:30 AM tomorrow, but the Collaboration Summit schedule shows the 'SPDX Working Meeting' starting at 9:00AM. Since the agenda sent to the list doesn't fill the

I just posted the agenda for the legal work stream topics for Thursday's face-to-face meeting at the Linux Foundation Collab Summit. Please review before coming, so we can use our time efficiently to

As many of us will be at the Linux Collaboration Summit, this week's general meeting is cancelled. Attached is a summary of the SPDX-related activities going on at the Summit and an agenda for our

I will discuss with Phil and get back to the the list-serv.

Added 4. Discuss use cases 1.x does solve.

Steve, This sounds really good to me. My only minor comment is that we should mostly focus on the objectives and use cases around 2.x and 3.x and not get too caught up on the timeline just yet.

Folks: Many thanks to those of you who participated in today’smeeting. I wanted to send out the wrap up next steps that I proposed and getfeedback incase I missed, or misstated something.

Thanks Phil: I have attached a couple of slides for our input to thediscussion. Steve From: spdx-biz-bounces@...[mailto:spdx-biz-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Philip Odence Sent: Thursday,

Sorry for the excessive email of late, but it comes of our prepping for the upcoming Collaboration Summit and SPDX Forum. Attached are a couple of slides to help us frame today's call. Phil L.

Daniel, Interesting you should ask, I just pinged Esteban for an update on this earlier in the week. He and Motorola were pursuing on behalf of the Linux Foundation (the holder of the marks). As of

Hi everybody, I am curious, why if "SPDX" is a registered trademark in the US (I just checked--not in canada, by the way) then there is the requirement to postfix it with "TM" and not with (R) as is

Hi everybody, my colleague Yuki Manabe, from the Univ. of Osaka, has been working hard trying to extract all the licenses in every program of every package in various Linux distributions (using

Over in spdx-tech this week, we started making use cases more precise and specific for SPDX 2.0: http://spdx.org/wiki/spdx-20-use-cases Some of the 1.0 ones needs to be refreshed, and there may be

All, I will be travelling on business this Thursday. I apologize in advance for having to miss this meeting. Regards, Jack Manbeck Texas Instruments www.ti.com Main: (301)

Hi. I think it could be interesting if someone could present SPDX at the coming Libre Software Meeting in Geneva in July 2012. More details at

Good one, Jilayne. Not sure everyone caught this one I did last Spring. http://www.spdx.org/content/celebrate-small-victories-and-cheers-open-source-initiative From: Jilayne Lovejoy

I was due to post a blog entry, so thought I'd take the opportunity to do a little proselytizing