|
Re: Today's SPDX Call
Thanks Phil:
I have attached a couple of slides for our input to thediscussion.
Steve
Thanks Phil:
I have attached a couple of slides for our input to thediscussion.
Steve
|
By
Steve Cropper (stcroppe) <stcroppe@...>
·
#576
·
|
|
Today's SPDX Call
Sorry for the excessive email of late, but it comes of our prepping for the upcoming Collaboration Summit and SPDX Forum.
Attached are a couple of slides to help us frame today's call.
Phil
L.
Sorry for the excessive email of late, but it comes of our prepping for the upcoming Collaboration Summit and SPDX Forum.
Attached are a couple of slides to help us frame today's call.
Phil
L.
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#575
·
|
|
Re: curious about the use of (R) and TM symbols
Daniel,
Interesting you should ask, I just pinged Esteban for an update on this
earlier in the week. He and Motorola were pursuing on behalf of the Linux
Foundation (the holder of the marks). As of
Daniel,
Interesting you should ask, I just pinged Esteban for an update on this
earlier in the week. He and Motorola were pursuing on behalf of the Linux
Foundation (the holder of the marks). As of
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#574
·
|
|
curious about the use of (R) and TM symbols
Hi everybody,
I am curious, why if "SPDX" is a registered trademark in the US (I just
checked--not in canada, by the way) then there is the requirement to
postfix it with "TM" and not with (R) as is
Hi everybody,
I am curious, why if "SPDX" is a registered trademark in the US (I just
checked--not in canada, by the way) then there is the requirement to
postfix it with "TM" and not with (R) as is
|
By
dmg
·
#573
·
|
|
variants of licenses
Hi everybody,
my colleague Yuki Manabe, from the Univ. of Osaka, has been working hard
trying to extract all the licenses in every program of every package in
various Linux distributions (using
Hi everybody,
my colleague Yuki Manabe, from the Univ. of Osaka, has been working hard
trying to extract all the licenses in every program of every package in
various Linux distributions (using
|
By
dmg
·
#572
·
|
|
SPDX 2.0 Use Cases
Over in spdx-tech this week, we started making use cases more precise and specific for
SPDX 2.0:
http://spdx.org/wiki/spdx-20-use-cases
Some of the 1.0 ones needs to be refreshed, and there may be
Over in spdx-tech this week, we started making use cases more precise and specific for
SPDX 2.0:
http://spdx.org/wiki/spdx-20-use-cases
Some of the 1.0 ones needs to be refreshed, and there may be
|
By
Ed Warnicke <eaw@...>
·
#571
·
|
|
Re: Special SPDX Adoption Meeting on Thursday - PLEASE READ
All,
I will be travelling on business this Thursday. I apologize in advance for having to miss this meeting.
Regards,
Jack Manbeck
Texas Instruments
www.ti.com
Main: (301)
All,
I will be travelling on business this Thursday. I apologize in advance for having to miss this meeting.
Regards,
Jack Manbeck
Texas Instruments
www.ti.com
Main: (301)
|
By
Manbeck, Jack
·
#570
·
|
|
Someone to present SPDX at LSM/RMLL in Geneva (July 2012) ?
Hi.
I think it could be interesting if someone could present SPDX at the
coming Libre Software Meeting in Geneva in July 2012.
More details at
Hi.
I think it could be interesting if someone could present SPDX at the
coming Libre Software Meeting in Geneva in July 2012.
More details at
|
By
Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@...>
·
#569
·
|
|
Re: proselytizing the License List
Good one, Jilayne. Not sure everyone caught this one I did last Spring. http://www.spdx.org/content/celebrate-small-victories-and-cheers-open-source-initiative
From: Jilayne Lovejoy
Good one, Jilayne. Not sure everyone caught this one I did last Spring. http://www.spdx.org/content/celebrate-small-victories-and-cheers-open-source-initiative
From: Jilayne Lovejoy
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#568
·
|
|
proselytizing the License List
I was due to post a blog entry, so thought I'd take the opportunity to do a little proselytizing
I was due to post a blog entry, so thought I'd take the opportunity to do a little proselytizing
|
By
Jilayne Lovejoy <jilayne.lovejoy@...>
·
#567
·
|
|
Special SPDX Adoption Meeting on Thursday - PLEASE READ
Just talked to Phil and he asked me to to clarify, meeting is on THURSDAY, not Wednesday as in original title. Apologies for the confusion.
Kate
Just talked to Phil and he asked me to to clarify, meeting is on THURSDAY, not Wednesday as in original title. Apologies for the confusion.
Kate
|
By
kate.stewart@...
·
#566
·
|
|
Re: Special SPDX Adoption Meeting on Wednesday - PLEASE READ
This message's subject says Wednesday, but the content says Thursday.
--
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: kfleming@... | SIP: kpfleming@... |
This message's subject says Wednesday, but the content says Thursday.
--
Kevin P. Fleming
Digium, Inc. | Director of Software Technologies
Jabber: kfleming@... | SIP: kpfleming@... |
|
By
Kevin P. Fleming <kpfleming@...>
·
#565
·
|
|
Special SPDX Adoption Meeting on Wednesday - PLEASE READ
IMPORTANT
Kim is out next week, so in the time normally reserved for the Business Team meeting, we will have a dedicated discussion about an important topic that came up in the General Meeting:
IMPORTANT
Kim is out next week, so in the time normally reserved for the Business Team meeting, we will have a dedicated discussion about an important topic that came up in the General Meeting:
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#564
·
|
|
SIGN UP NOW for SPDX Forum if you are planning to attend
We already have 37 registrants ā including quite a few people that have not been normal participants. Everyone needs to register so that we can get a full count for food and the
We already have 37 registrants ā including quite a few people that have not been normal participants. Everyone needs to register so that we can get a full count for food and the
|
By
Kim Weins
·
#563
·
|
|
SPDX General Meeting Minutes, Agenda and Reminder for March 22 Meeting
Upcoming Events:
We will have a working meeting at the Linux Collab Summit in San Francisco, April 4-5
There will also be an SPDX event at Cisco in San Jose, April 6. The purpose will be outreach and
Upcoming Events:
We will have a working meeting at the Linux Collab Summit in San Francisco, April 4-5
There will also be an SPDX event at Cisco in San Jose, April 6. The purpose will be outreach and
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#562
·
|
|
Re: SPDX lists moving to LF
* Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...> [2012-03-16 09:41]:
The migration is complete.
--
Martin Michlmayr
Open Source Program Office, Hewlett-Packard
* Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...> [2012-03-16 09:41]:
The migration is complete.
--
Martin Michlmayr
Open Source Program Office, Hewlett-Packard
|
By
Martin Michlmayr
·
#561
·
|
|
SPDX lists moving to LF
As part of our integration with the Linux Foundation, the SPDX lists
are moving to LF infrastructure. The lists are moving from FOSSBazaar
to <http://lists.spdx.org/> which is hosted by the LF.
As part of our integration with the Linux Foundation, the SPDX lists
are moving to LF infrastructure. The lists are moving from FOSSBazaar
to <http://lists.spdx.org/> which is hosted by the LF.
|
By
Martin Michlmayr
·
#560
·
|
|
Reminder: Biz team meeting Thurs AM
At 11am ET, 8am PT
Dial in 866-740-1260
ID 2404502
Topics
-Collab Summit
-SPDX Forum
-Web site
At 11am ET, 8am PT
Dial in 866-740-1260
ID 2404502
Topics
-Collab Summit
-SPDX Forum
-Web site
|
By
Kim Weins
·
#559
·
|
|
Re: Logistics for visitors to the Bay Area getting to the SPDX Forum on April 6
Maybe we can coordinate details on this at the Collab Summit meeting.
Kim
Maybe we can coordinate details on this at the Collab Summit meeting.
Kim
|
By
Kim Weins
·
#558
·
|
|
Re: Logistics for visitors to the Bay Area getting to the SPDX Forum on April 6
Kevin and Guillaume,
As you can tell, we have public transit in the Bay Area, but it is not particularly well coordinated across systems. I suspect that the best approach will be some combination of
Kevin and Guillaume,
As you can tell, we have public transit in the Bay Area, but it is not particularly well coordinated across systems. I suspect that the best approach will be some combination of
|
By
mjherzog
·
#557
·
|