Thanks, Scott. I've informed the LF. * Scott Lamons <scott.lamons@...> [2012-03-01 01:52]: -- Martin Michlmayr Open Source Program Office, Hewlett-Packard

Thanks all, your replies are truly appreciated. I withdraw the request to change the License identifier for the Eclipse Public License from EPL-1.0 to Eclipse-1.0. Separately, we are looking for

I've only ever heard it referenced as the EPL.

FWIW, I don't think I've ever encountered "Eclipse" meaning "Eclipse Public License". Always EPL or the full expanded name. - Richard

Hi Folks, Just thought I would point out that the SPDX link on the LF Open Compliance Program page appears to be broken. -Scott

Thanks Mike, The Eclipse Foundation certainly gets the big vote regarding how their license is referred to. My experience is primarily commercial ISVs in the tools space, about a dozen,

I agree. I’m surprised someone didn’t recognize EPL (or even EDL which we probably need to add….). Could be they were not familiar with Eclipse? Jack

For what it is worth, my experience is that people affiliatedwith Eclipse in some way refer to it as EPL, but that "casual" people who comeacross it in another context (e.g., commonly in diligence)

Tom, FWIW, It is certainly news to me that people refer to the EPL as "Eclipse". I have universally heard it referred to as the EPL. I have literally never heard it referred to as Eclipse. I

a) Please have that person contact me and I'll check the mail logs. b) In order to recover your password, go to https://fossbazaar.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx enter your email address in the text box

In my circles it's more common to refer to it as EPL instead of Eclipse. In fact even the Eclipse foundation refers to it as EPL: http://www.eclipse.org/legal/eplfaq.php

Hello SPDX license list interested parties, I would like to propose that we change the License Identifier for the Eclipse Public License 1.0 on the SPDX License List from “EPL-1.0” to

On 02/29/2012 09:02 PM, Lamons, Scott (Open Source Program Office) wrote: During the linux.com outage the fossbazaar.org mailinglists were also offline and it took a while before

I was talking to someone who was trying to join the SPDX mailing list a while back but never received a response. Does anyone know the what the status is? I'd check the member list but I forgot

Save the Dates: We will have a working meeting at the Linux Collab Summit in San Francisco,April 4-5 There will also be an SPDX event at Cisco in San Jose,April 6. The purpose will be outreach and

Hi All The Biz Team has been planning a meeting targeted at potential SPDX users. The idea is to begin to socialize companies to the ideas of SPDX and get them thinking about how it can help them in

Phil and all, I know theSPDX mailing list is not the best mailing list to do this request but I wouldlike to launch a new initiative on FOSS governance standardisation, can someonetell me what is the

Sorry for the late reminder. Meeting Time: Feb 9, 8am PDT / 10 am CDT / 11am EDT / 15:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html Conf call dial-in: Conference code:

Hi All As you may know, we are in the middle of moving over our SPDX website to a new structure. We are ready to start moving, editing and creating content. I’ve attached a pdf explaining how to

Meeting Time: Jan 26, 8am PDT / 10 am CDT / 11am EDT / 15:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html Conf call dial-in: Conference code: 7812589502 Toll-free dial-in