Apologies, but once again, I have a conflict and will not be able to join, however Kirsten will (once again) do a fine job chairing in my absence. In addition to reviewing the minutes from the last

There have been multiple discussions in different working groups about the nomenclature, meaning and intent of the package license fields. To ensure we are all on the right page, we want ot have some

Hi. (I'm new here, so pardon me if this is some kind of FAQ.) The SPDX acronym looks quite general, and the charter doesn't seem to limit itself to licensing/copyright matters. However, looking at

Here's another update on the mailing list numbers: spdx: 105 spdz-biz: 21 spdx-legal: 29 spdx-tech: 26 -- Martin Michlmayr Open Source Program Office, Hewlett-Packard

Hi everyone, this is a spin off of a discussion I was having with Peter and Garry on the tech mailing list. I am considering how SPDX could form the basis for the following example use

Yes, I have added this to my list of updates for the next license list spreadsheet version. This also makes me wonder if there are other "older" licenses that were OSI certified and I may have

I will make sure the appropriate change is included in the next version of the license list spreadsheet, which should be relatively soon! Jilayne Jilayne Lovejoy | Corporate

I added 2 bugs in bugzilla: - Bug 811 -Produce an archive of license texts for SPDX licenses - Bug 812 -Add a column to the index of licenses to indicate if a license is OSI

I have a conflict and will not be able to join, however Kirsten will do a fine job chairing in my absence.. Meeting Time: June 2, 8am PDT / 10 am CDT / 11am EDT / 15:00 UTC.

agreed. -- Motorola Inc. E.A. Rockett Senior Counsel Software, Applications & Digital Content Licensing (408)541-6703 (O) (408)541-6900 (F) (415)508-7625 (M) rockett@...

Hi Martin, it will also help to have a simple tar file with all the licenses, each in its own file, and without the HTML tagging. Basically, the actual text of the license. --dmg --

Jilayne - lets discuss at your convinence. (today if possible) Rockett

* Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@...> [2011-05-26 10:25]: Jilayne, are you the right person to take care of this? Gary, is this something you can add to your tool? -- Martin

See my blog post on the subject: http://www.spdx.org/content/celebrate-small-victories-and-cheers-open-source-initiative

Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...> wrote: Thank you! BTW: Could you add a OSI tag to http://spdx.org/licenses/CPL-1.0? This license is superceeded but it is used for the korn shell and other AT&T

* Gary O'Neall <gary@...> [2011-05-25 18:05]: I've put the update in place now. However, the issues pointed out by Juergen and Joerg are different to the known issue. I've fixed

[ adding Debian relevant people for DEP5 & preserving all extra needed Cc:-s mentioned in the thread thus far (I hope :)) ] Agreed, of course. A small clarification is needed here. Actually DEP5

http://spdx.org/licenses/ISC and error. Confirming this problem for Firefox 4.0.1

First, let me be a pain in the neck and suggest we should move this discussion to the spdx-legal list. We've committed to limiting this general list to more summary information and less real work. My

I brought this up because it is a new signature in FOSSology and I'd like the name to be as close to the SPDX guidelines as possible. I really like Daniel's method of identifying disjunctive