|
Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)
I added 2 bugs in bugzilla:
- Bug 811 -Produce an archive of license texts for SPDX licenses
- Bug 812 -Add a column to the index of licenses to indicate if a license is OSI
I added 2 bugs in bugzilla:
- Bug 811 -Produce an archive of license texts for SPDX licenses
- Bug 812 -Add a column to the index of licenses to indicate if a license is OSI
|
By
Gary O'Neall
·
#406
·
|
|
Thursday SPDX General Meeting Reminder and Agenda.
I have a conflict and will not be able to join, however Kirsten will do a fine job chairing in my absence..
Meeting Time: June 2, 8am PDT / 10 am CDT / 11am EDT / 15:00 UTC.
I have a conflict and will not be able to join, however Kirsten will do a fine job chairing in my absence..
Meeting Time: June 2, 8am PDT / 10 am CDT / 11am EDT / 15:00 UTC.
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#405
·
|
|
Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)
agreed.
--
Motorola Inc.
E.A. Rockett
Senior Counsel
Software, Applications &
Digital Content Licensing
(408)541-6703 (O)
(408)541-6900 (F)
(415)508-7625 (M)
rockett@...
agreed.
--
Motorola Inc.
E.A. Rockett
Senior Counsel
Software, Applications &
Digital Content Licensing
(408)541-6703 (O)
(408)541-6900 (F)
(415)508-7625 (M)
rockett@...
|
By
Esteban Rockett <mgia3940@...>
·
#404
·
|
|
Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)
Hi Martin,
it will also help to have a simple tar file with all the licenses,
each in its own file, and without the HTML tagging.
Basically, the actual text of the license.
--dmg
--
Hi Martin,
it will also help to have a simple tar file with all the licenses,
each in its own file, and without the HTML tagging.
Basically, the actual text of the license.
--dmg
--
|
By
dmg
·
#403
·
|
|
Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)
Jilayne - lets discuss at your convinence. (today if possible)
Rockett
Jilayne - lets discuss at your convinence. (today if possible)
Rockett
|
By
Esteban Rockett <mgia3940@...>
·
#402
·
|
|
Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)
* Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@...> [2011-05-26 10:25]:
Jilayne, are you the right person to take care of this?
Gary, is this something you can add to your tool?
--
Martin
* Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@...> [2011-05-26 10:25]:
Jilayne, are you the right person to take care of this?
Gary, is this something you can add to your tool?
--
Martin
|
By
Martin Michlmayr
·
#401
·
|
|
OSI adopts SPDX short names
See my blog post on the subject:
http://www.spdx.org/content/celebrate-small-victories-and-cheers-open-source-initiative
See my blog post on the subject:
http://www.spdx.org/content/celebrate-small-victories-and-cheers-open-source-initiative
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#400
·
|
|
Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)
Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...> wrote:
Thank you!
BTW: Could you add a OSI tag to http://spdx.org/licenses/CPL-1.0?
This license is superceeded but it is used for the korn shell and other AT&T
Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...> wrote:
Thank you!
BTW: Could you add a OSI tag to http://spdx.org/licenses/CPL-1.0?
This license is superceeded but it is used for the korn shell and other AT&T
|
By
Joerg Schilling <Joerg.Schilling@...>
·
#399
·
|
|
Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)
* Gary O'Neall <gary@...> [2011-05-25 18:05]:
I've put the update in place now. However, the issues pointed out by
Juergen and Joerg are different to the known issue. I've fixed
* Gary O'Neall <gary@...> [2011-05-25 18:05]:
I've put the update in place now. However, the issues pointed out by
Juergen and Joerg are different to the known issue. I've fixed
|
By
Martin Michlmayr
·
#398
·
|
|
Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011
[ adding Debian relevant people for DEP5 & preserving all extra needed
Cc:-s mentioned in the thread thus far (I hope :)) ]
Agreed, of course.
A small clarification is needed here. Actually DEP5
[ adding Debian relevant people for DEP5 & preserving all extra needed
Cc:-s mentioned in the thread thus far (I hope :)) ]
Agreed, of course.
A small clarification is needed here. Actually DEP5
|
By
Stefano Zacchiroli <leader@...>
·
#397
·
|
|
Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)
http://spdx.org/licenses/ISC and
error.
Confirming this problem for Firefox 4.0.1
http://spdx.org/licenses/ISC and
error.
Confirming this problem for Firefox 4.0.1
|
By
Soeren_Rabenstein@...
·
#396
·
|
|
Re: license name question
First, let me be a pain in the neck and suggest we should move this
discussion to the spdx-legal list. We've committed to limiting this
general list to more summary information and less real work.
My
First, let me be a pain in the neck and suggest we should move this
discussion to the spdx-legal list. We've committed to limiting this
general list to more summary information and less real work.
My
|
By
Philip Odence
·
#393
·
|
|
Re: license name question
I brought this up because it is a new signature in FOSSology and I'd like the name to be as close to the SPDX guidelines as possible. I really like Daniel's method of identifying disjunctive
I brought this up because it is a new signature in FOSSology and I'd like the name to be as close to the SPDX guidelines as possible. I really like Daniel's method of identifying disjunctive
|
By
Bob Gobeille
·
#392
·
|
|
Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011 (XML errors)
Hi Juergen,
Thanks for pointing out the errors. I believe this is a known encoding
error which should be fixed when we next update the licenses. This will be
fixed on the next update. We don't
Hi Juergen,
Thanks for pointing out the errors. I believe this is a known encoding
error which should be fixed when we next update the licenses. This will be
fixed on the next update. We don't
|
By
Gary O'Neall
·
#395
·
|
|
Re: Licensing Workshop at LinuxTag 2011
Hello,
Ciaran Farrell said on Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:35:01PM +0200:
Just for completion (and maybe discussion with them), I attended a
session at the latest Solutions Linux in Paris, where a project
Hello,
Ciaran Farrell said on Wed, May 25, 2011 at 01:35:01PM +0200:
Just for completion (and maybe discussion with them), I attended a
session at the latest Solutions Linux in Paris, where a project
|
By
Bruno Cornec <Bruno.Cornec@...>
·
#394
·
|
|
Re: license name question
Daniel, et al.
By "KDEupgradeClause" you are referring to the previous posts re: KDE
reserving the right to decide on post-v3 versions of GPL as well, is that
right?
I suppose from the standpoint of
Daniel, et al.
By "KDEupgradeClause" you are referring to the previous posts re: KDE
reserving the right to decide on post-v3 versions of GPL as well, is that
right?
I suppose from the standpoint of
|
By
Jilayne Lovejoy <jilayne.lovejoy@...>
·
#391
·
|
|
Re: license name question
Hi Bob, Scott, Jilayne, Armijn,
Office) <scott.lamons@...> wrote:
We (as in Ninka) decided to consider this a (GPLv2 |
GPLv3-KDEupgradeClause). It can also be considered: (GPLv2 | GPLv3
Hi Bob, Scott, Jilayne, Armijn,
Office) <scott.lamons@...> wrote:
We (as in Ninka) decided to consider this a (GPLv2 |
GPLv3-KDEupgradeClause). It can also be considered: (GPLv2 | GPLv3
|
By
dmg
·
#390
·
|
|
Re: license name question
Because KDE e.V. is a German non-profit and its members like to have endless meetings ;-)
Kidding aside, this license change came a few years ago because they went through a lot of pain when they
Because KDE e.V. is a German non-profit and its members like to have endless meetings ;-)
Kidding aside, this license change came a few years ago because they went through a lot of pain when they
|
By
Armijn Hemel <armijn@...>
·
#389
·
|
|
Re: license name question
This is the way I read it as well. However I don't know why they wouldn't just license it under GPLv2 or GPLv3 and eliminate the "or (at your option) any later version..." which seems completely
This is the way I read it as well. However I don't know why they wouldn't just license it under GPLv2 or GPLv3 and eliminate the "or (at your option) any later version..." which seems completely
|
By
Lamons, Scott (Open Source Program Office) <scott.lamons@...>
·
#388
·
|
|
Re: license name question
doh!
Thank you and Armijn for straightening me out.
So would a reasonable license name be "GPL-2+-KDE" ?
Bob Gobeille
doh!
Thank you and Armijn for straightening me out.
So would a reasonable license name be "GPL-2+-KDE" ?
Bob Gobeille
|
By
Bob Gobeille
·
#387
·
|