Perhaps we stick with the version of MIT that is listed at http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php as a way to include this license in the standard list -- it is too commonly used to

Delurking ... This is rather contrary to our experiences at Red Hat. We've encountered fascinatingly numerous language variants on the MIT/X11/Expat license family in the wild (though you might want

- Regarding the MIT license. This is a VERY well-established license, #4 on the Black Duck site, is listed in expected form the OSI site, etc. I have not seen variants other than the

Thanks, Tom. Do you (or anyone on thelist) have any thoughts on the 3 items highlighted in yellow below? Jilayne Lovejoy | Corporate Counsel jlovejoy@... 720 240 4545 | phone 720 240

Hi Jilayne, On the legal call today I offered to do a last look at the Debian / SPDX license name differences. I agree with Kim: The exclusion of “.0” in cases where the license

** For SPDX Legal WorkStream ** As a means to drive comments/redlines, below please find were we left off in the last SPDX Legal Workstream Call for the following Sections. Many

(Intentionally cross-posting meeting invite to main mailing list to reach potential audience, although we keep tech discussions on spdx-tech) Today's spdx-tech call will be at 4pm Eastern

I upgraded some components of our web site today. If you notice any problems, please let me know. -- Martin Michlmayr Open Source Program Office, Hewlett-Packard

Hi Guillaume Please feel free to send any feedback via email to the spdx-biz@... list. We would love to have you participate in the Beta. We will be doing a Beta Orientation on Thursday, Feb 3 (in

We reviewed slides for the Beta Orientation scheduled for Feb 3rd. See minutes and drafts of preso at http://www.spdx.org/wiki/business-team-meeting-agendaminutes-20110120 Kim

Peter> The license of a license file is not necessarily the license defined Peter> in that file. For example, if the file COPYING contains the text of Peter> the GPL-v2 its license should be

Kim, I won't be able to attend the confcall. I read the attached version of the slide, and wonder if we could request some feedbacks and suggestions for improvement (slide 5) about the

We are set for 11amET/8am PT. Call logistics below. We will be reviewing the slides for the Beta Program. I’ve attached my section of the slides here. Call US 866-740-1260 Int'l

(Intentionally cross-posting meeting invite to main mailing list to reach potential audience, although we keep tech discussions on spdx-tech) Just a reminder that the spdx-tech group meets

SPDX Mailing List: This is a heads-up that the Linux Collaboration Summit scheduled for April 6-8, 2011 in San Francisco will include two half-day sessions for SPDX face-to-face meetings. Please

The license of a license file is not necessarily the license defined in that file. For example, if the file COPYING contains the text of the GPL-v2 its license should be Everyone is permitted to

Thanks Jilayne After looking this over, we are pretty well aligned with two exceptions Debian excludes the “.0” on ends of versions (eg Apache-1 instead of Apache-1.0) Debian uses GFDL for GNU

Already got mine in too. Hope to see you all there.

I requested the invitation this morning. Best Regards. Guillaume Le 17/01/11 13:23, Philip Odence a écrit : -- Guillaume ROUSSEAUCEO, Co-Founder, Antelink Président,

The Business and Technical teams will be holding half-day face-to-face meetings at the Collaboration Summit April 6-8. Please consider joining