I think the concept is sound and, as Rockett says, consistent. Minor stuff: - I agree with Peter that we may want to tweak the names and the descriptions. - Description under Asserted still says

Kate: Thank you for sending. Agree 100%. All: This issue has been a continually thought of all founders since the origins of SPDX. The below is consistent with the original intent of SPDX, and

What about naming the field that represents the actual license of a file/package "License". In the current spec File already has such a property so all that would have to be done is adjust the

Based on discussions on the SPDX call today, I think we are closing in on the following proposal for the file level to address the concerns raised by Open Logic. There will be a special call tomorrow

Note: I realize that the link I sent our for the webshare has an older date embedded in it. Please ignore and use it anyway. Thanks, Phil L. Philip Odence Vice President of Business Development Black

There has been a bit of discussion in the technical working group about the role of judgments in spdx. It has been suggested that information that is the result of human, or automated

Meeting Time: Dec 2, 8am PDT / 10 am CDT / 11am EDT / 16:00 UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html Conf call dial-in: Conference code: 7812589502 Toll-free dial-in number

This event has been changed. more details » SPDX Legal Workstream Bi-Weekly Call 11ET/10CT/8PT Changed: All: - Please note, proposed minutes from our last meeting are posted on the SPDX Wiki under

This event has been changed. more details » Changed: SPDX Legal Workstream Bi-Weekly Call 11ET/10CT/8PT Happy New Year to all. This calendar appointment is for our regular bi-weekly SPDX Legal

more details » SPDX Legal Workstream (Rollout) Call 11ET/10CT/8PT Happy New Year to all. This calendar appointment is for our regular bi-weekly SPDX Legal Workstream call. Many

This was caused by a Drupal upgrade I did earlier today. The issue has not been fixed yet (<http://drupal.org/node/1019788>) so I downgraded to the previous version. * Tom Incorvia

Hi SPDX Team, Most of the links on the SPDSX site are not working – I was trying to get to the license list. Tom Tom Incorvia tom.incorvia@... Direct: (512) 340-1336 Mobile:

Hi All Minutes are now available. http://www.spdx.org/wiki/business-team-meeting-agendaminutes-20110106 We spent most of the call talking about the Beta program. We are targeting Feb 3rd to have an

To avoid any confusion, I wanted to make clear that the next SPDX General Meeting is next Thursday, January 13. There would have been a meeting last week, but we cancelled it due to the holidays; Jan

------ Original Appointment From: kim.weins@... When: 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM December 9, 2010 Subject: SPDX Business (Rollout) Call 11ET/8PT Location: See dial in below US 866-740-1260 Int'l

Hello SPDX, I have been lurking in the background for a while now; I maintain man(1) and I keep a DOAP file on the project site, I thought I would take a crack at SPDX:

Hi Jilayne, Thanks for getting the next rev of the license list out! Regarding the BSD licenses: I did some of the original work on the BSD licenses. Below is the post from June 2010. Fine

http://www.spdx.org/wiki/working-version-license-list Itemsof note: Olderversions of various licenses have been added. Zlib andlibpng licenses are both included. Onlyremaining issue that I

For SPDX, I suppose it makes sense to take the templated zlib and call it "zlib", and call the libpng variant "libpng", even though I don't think Fedora will ever make that

I told everyone we were planning to have it, and then forgot myself. Holiday brain I guess. We’ll reconvene post-holidays. Kim On Thu 12/23/10 9:09 AM, "Philip Odence" <podence@...> wrote: Kim