spdx@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

SPDX Sept General Meeting Minutes & Announcement

SPDX Community, Minutes: https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2021-09-02 As you are aware, in last week’s meeting we discussed a proposal to change the SPDX workgroup’s

By Phil Odence · #1433 ·

Re: SPDX Thursday General Meeting Reminder - SPECIAL MEETING

Thanks, Sebastian for your thoughts, support and understanding. Regarding licensing, my sense was that your desire to make the spec easy to publish is covered by the proposed licensing scheme.

By Phil Odence · #1432 ·

Re: SPDX Thursday General Meeting Reminder - SPECIAL MEETING

Dear all, During today's General Meeting, in which the Core Team presented a proposal to improve the governance of SPDX, I brought up a few suggestions to the current proposal. Going into the meeting

By Sebastian Crane · #1431 ·

SPDX Thursday General Meeting Reminder - SPECIAL MEETING

We will deviate from our usual standing agenda for this special meeting. We will start with a presentation from a Google Summer of Code student (see topic below) and then will pick up the discussion

By Phil Odence · #1430 ·

Re: SPDX Governance Next Steps

Thanks Richard and Jilayne! Yes, in other cases we've seen one LF project become a member of another, for purposes of showing support and furthering collaboration between the projects' communities. In

By Steve Winslow · #1429 ·

Re: SPDX Governance Next Steps

Hi Richard, I love your forward thinking! First we have to have the review and acceptance of the proposal. Assuming that goes through and as to whether the Yocto Project could

By J Lovejoy · #1428 ·

Re: SPDX Governance Next Steps

FWIW I've been wondering how we could show a relationship between Yocto Project and SPDX as we are a strong support of it so this looks timely in that regard assuming we'd be eligible as an associate

By Richard Purdie · #1427 ·

SPDX Governance Next Steps

SPDX Community, As previewed in the June General Meeting, the Core Team has submitted a proposal for changing the governance of SPDX. The reasoning for the change and substance are the same as what

By Phil Odence · #1426 ·

SPDX DocFest - Sept 16, 2021 - Call for Participation

As a follow-up to this morning SPDX general meeting, below is the information on the upcoming SPDX DocFest: The SPDX project will be hosting an initial working "DocFest" to bring together the

By Gary O'Neall · #1425 ·

Thursday's SPDX General Meeting/ Google Summer of Code Presentations

This week’s meeting with feature two GSoC presentations. Note I have a conflict so Gary will host. PLEASE: When you sign in, please include your name and company (or put them in the chat) to

By Phil Odence · #1424 ·

[openchain] OpenChain Third Monday Webinar - 2021-06-21 - 14:00 UTC / 07:00 PST / 15:00 BST / 16:00 CEST / 19:30 IST / 22:00 CST / 23:00 KST / 23:00 JST: SBOM Challenges in Unstructured Projects + Case Study: Readiness Assessment for OpenChain ISO 5230

We are covering SBOMs today, so perhaps of interest :) Begin forwarded message: From: "Shane Coughlan via lists.openchainproject.org" <scoughlan=linuxfoundation.org@...> Subject: [openchain]

By Shane Coughlan · #1423 ·

Re: Question on two MIT-derivatives

<pombredanne@...> wrote: You really did help, thanks for the pointers and license disambiguation! I think with that in place there is no further need to fix (in project) or track (SPDX) them in

By Christian Ehrhardt · #1422 ·

Re: Question on two MIT-derivatives

Hi Christian, Thanks for reaching to the SPDX project! As this has purely to do with licenses, it may be better addressed to the legal working group at spdx-legal@.... Alternatively,

By Alexios Zavras · #1421 ·

Re: Question on two MIT-derivatives

Hi Christian: <christian.ehrhardt@...> wrote: I ran scancode-toolkit and the license in base64.c [1] is identified as an ISC alright. The only (IMHO not material) change is the

By Philippe Ombredanne · #1420 ·

Question on two MIT-derivatives

Hi SPDX, I was refreshing the license info on a Debian package and found two licenses that seemed to be MIT-variants that I wasn't sure about. The reason I looked at it was mostly technical as the

By Christian Ehrhardt · #1419 ·

July Meeting Minutes

Whoops! https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2021-07-01 There were several attendees who’s organizations I don’t know. Please let me know and I will amend. Thanks. Phil

By Phil Odence · #1418 ·

July Meeting Minutes

By Phil Odence · #1417 ·

Thursday's SPDX General Meeting reminder

You should by this time have a new recurring meeting invite on your calendar with the Jitsi. PLEASE: When you sign in, please include your name and company (or put them in the chat) to facilitate

By Phil Odence · #1416 ·

Re: [spdx-tech] Should SPDX endorse SCA tools?

We've got a lot of historical cruft in our SPDX repo as well. Coming up with some criteria for inclusion & removal is overdue. After we settle the 3.0 template issue, you up for dedicating part of a

By Kate Stewart · #1415 ·

Re: SPDX June General Meeting Minutes

Hi Philippe, Thanks for your comments and thoughts on this. I know this was a couple of weeks ago, but I had a few thoughts I wanted to share. You're right that the Community Specification License is

By Steve Winslow · #1414 ·

261 - 280 of 1693

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms