For those interested -- as a follow-up to Kate's message about the EO, here is an article in ZDNet that mentions several aspects of SPDX and how it addresses objectives of the

Last night Biden signed Executive Order (EO) on Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity. As part of this Executive order the concept of SBOM is getting widespread visibility. If the question comes up

https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2021-05-06 L. Philip Odence General Manager, Black Duck Audit Business Synopsys Software Integrity Group, Burlington, MA M (781) 258-9502 |

https://meet.jit.si/SPDXGeneralMeeting :) On 5/5/21 10:45 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:

Quoting Phil Odence via lists.spdx.org (2021-05-05 14:47:03) Great to hear that meetings now use Open standards and Free software! Could you please share only the room name, stripped from the

Dear all, It's great to hear that everything went fine in the test run :) I'll be looking forward to tomorrow's meeting; indeed, mention of Mark Atwood's talk has certainly piqued my

You may be aware that based on SPDX community input we decided to move away from Uberconference. Initially the thought was to move to Zoom, but we are trying an open source alternative, Jitsi.

Thanks Jilayne! One tweak, just to clarify -- I haven't set up a separate Jitsi instance, the invite Phil will be sharing is instead for a Jitsi meeting on the standard free meet.jit.si service

Hi all, Following up with an update on this! First of all, big thanks to Sebastian for taking the bull by the horns and not just asking, but doing; and to Karen for

Dear all, Earlier this month there were a number of edits proposed on Google Docs to the SPDX License List FAQs. Since the activity on that has now died down a little, I've created a repository on

Dear Steve, That is great to hear! With the commercial Jitsi hosting that you have arranged and the Software Freedom Conservancy's BigBlueButton as a contingency platform, we should be very well set

Hello all, Many thanks to all of you for your feedback and comments on this topic. Sebastian, thank you especially for investigating this and for your efforts looking into Jitsi hosting. I'm pleased

Feel free to do this. So you know, the room I set up[1] is just available whenever anyone wants to use it. I have it set up so that everyone who joins can be a moderator (my schedule is such that I'll

~ Sebastian [2021-04-12 16:38 +0200]: Great idea to ask Fosshost for tech sponsoring! Good comparison. BBB and Jitsi are really different. From our experience at the FSFE, BBB is rather for fixed

Dear James, First off, I've got great news: Fosshost have accepted my application for SPDX hosting! I have been informed that we are now on their queue. It's probable that new DNS records will need

On Sun, 2021-04-11 at 20:16 +0100, Sebastian wrote: [...] > > > I'd suggest that Jitsi is more appropriate for our use than BBB > > > (Jitsi is a more flexible platform), > > > > I don't quite agree

Dear James, That Jitsi server is indeed available for our use; it's sort of the demo server for 8x8's enterprise Jitsi integration. However, that instance's terms of use limits the number of

What's wrong with just using https://meet.jit.si ? It's the Jitsi project free server available to anyone without a prior reservation or appointment. I don't quite agree with this statement, but

Dear all, Here's the update that Jilayne said was on its way! During the week I've applied for Jitsi hosting for our meetings; so far I am still awaiting responses. I am expecting to receive one

While I'm sorry I've been unable to participate in SPDX working groups as of late, I'd be happy to offer Conservancy's BBB instance for these meetings. I set up a room so that any of you can try it