Hi all, This message from Santiago bounced, which is a good reminder for all newcomers that you will want to join the spdx-general mailing list, and probably the spdx-tech mailing list (for tech team

Exciting indeed! Looking forward to this! -Santiago

An exciting development! As you may know, there have been a handful of groups working on standardizing SBOMs. Kate and Gary have been working closely with the 3T SBOM group for some time. Our

Thank you for your kind support Kate-san ! Best regards, Kentaro Takahashi

Thanks for sending this Takahashi-san. I'm forwarding this email for discussion on the spdx-tech mailing list where the usage profile will be discussed. spdx-tech is where we are discussing the

Dear members, We are in the license information exchange sub group under OpenChain Japan WG, and would like to propose usage profile for SPDX3.0 on this mailing list based on Kate's suggestion as

Moving this from spdx general list to spdx-tech list. Greetings Stephanie, If you are referring to an external SPDX document, you will want to use the ExternalSpdxDocument rather than

Hi Alan, Your Firefox extension works really well. Thanks for this great tool! Best, Till Am 14.01.21 um 22:26 schrieb Alan Tse:

I'm glad this topic came up, because I hadn't heard of spdx-license-diff before, and now I have it installed. That's a pretty good start to a Friday! Thanks, Alan! steve

Thanks, and I see it’s already done. Now I need to see why my tool isn’t matching it. ..m

Hi Mark, I’m also not sure of which SPDX tool you were using but I checked with the browser extensionspdx-license-diff and I get a template match to MIT since the extra part is optional as

Hi Mark, The MIT license template on the license list [1] has the language "(including the next paragraph)" as optional text, which is why that part shows up in blue italics on the list [2]. I think

The "X.org Preferred License" documented at [ https://www.x.org/archive/current/doc/xorg-docs/License.html ] is the MIT license with the additional text in the middle "(including the

HelloJ I am currently working on an issue in the Oss-Review-Toolkit [1] to support referring to external SPDX files from a `project.spdx.yml` [2]. I am currently checking out the spdx-specs

Here’s a new invite for 2021. Please accept the recurring meeting Note there will be no SPDX General Meeting in January. **** New dial in number: 415-881-1586 No PIN needed The weblink for

This is an old meeting. Please ignore.

I am trying to remove a legacy event from an old calendar. I think you will receive a cancellation of this old meeting. Apologies, just ignore. We are on for a General Meeting next week. Happy New

Happy Holidays, All. See you in 2021! https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2020-12-03 General Meeting/Minutes/2020-12-03 < General Meeting‎ | Minutes · Attendance:

GENERAL MEETING Meeting Time: Thurs, Dec 3, 8am PT / 10 am CT / 11am ET / 15:00UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html Conf call dial-in: New dial in number: 415-881-1586 No

Sorry for the late notice. Today we will have the standard agenda plus a walkthrough of the state of the 3.0 spec. GENERAL MEETING Meeting Time: Thurs, Nov 5, 8am PT / 10 am CT / 11am