|
Re: [spdx-tech] [spdx] Usage profile for SPDX3.0 - proposal from OpenChain Japan WG -
Thank you for your kind support Kate-san !
Best regards,
Kentaro Takahashi
Thank you for your kind support Kate-san !
Best regards,
Kentaro Takahashi
|
By
Takahashi, Kentaro <kentaro_takahashi@...>
·
#1373
·
|
|
Usage profile for SPDX3.0 - proposal from OpenChain Japan WG -
Thanks for sending this Takahashi-san.
I'm forwarding this email for discussion on the spdx-tech mailing list
where the usage profile will be discussed. spdx-tech is where we
are discussing the
Thanks for sending this Takahashi-san.
I'm forwarding this email for discussion on the spdx-tech mailing list
where the usage profile will be discussed. spdx-tech is where we
are discussing the
|
By
Kate Stewart
·
#1372
·
|
|
Usage profile for SPDX3.0 - proposal from OpenChain Japan WG -
Dear members,
We are in the license information exchange sub group under OpenChain Japan WG, and would like to propose usage profile for SPDX3.0 on this mailing list based on Kate's suggestion as
Dear members,
We are in the license information exchange sub group under OpenChain Japan WG, and would like to propose usage profile for SPDX3.0 on this mailing list based on Kate's suggestion as
|
By
Takahashi, Kentaro <kentaro_takahashi@...>
·
#1371
·
|
|
Re: Referencing external spdx documents with package information from project.spdx.yml
Moving this from spdx general list to spdx-tech list.
Greetings Stephanie,
If you are referring to an external SPDX document, you will want to use the ExternalSpdxDocument rather than
Moving this from spdx general list to spdx-tech list.
Greetings Stephanie,
If you are referring to an external SPDX document, you will want to use the ExternalSpdxDocument rather than
|
By
Gary O'Neall
·
#1370
·
|
|
Re: "X.org Preferred License"
Hi Alan,
Your Firefox extension works really well. Thanks for this great tool!
Best,
Till
Am 14.01.21 um 22:26 schrieb Alan Tse:
Hi Alan,
Your Firefox extension works really well. Thanks for this great tool!
Best,
Till
Am 14.01.21 um 22:26 schrieb Alan Tse:
|
By
Till Jaeger
·
#1369
·
|
|
Re: "X.org Preferred License"
I'm glad this topic came up, because I hadn't heard of spdx-license-diff before, and now I have it installed. That's a pretty good start to a Friday!
Thanks, Alan!
steve
I'm glad this topic came up, because I hadn't heard of spdx-license-diff before, and now I have it installed. That's a pretty good start to a Friday!
Thanks, Alan!
steve
|
By
Steve Kilbane
·
#1368
·
|
|
Re: "X.org Preferred License"
Thanks, and I see it’s already done. Now I need to see why my tool isn’t matching it.
..m
Thanks, and I see it’s already done. Now I need to see why my tool isn’t matching it.
..m
|
By
Mark Atwood (Amazon.com)
·
#1367
·
|
|
Re: "X.org Preferred License"
Hi Mark,
I’m also not sure of which SPDX tool you were using but I checked with the browser extensionspdx-license-diff and I get a template match to MIT since the extra part is optional as
Hi Mark,
I’m also not sure of which SPDX tool you were using but I checked with the browser extensionspdx-license-diff and I get a template match to MIT since the extra part is optional as
|
By
Alan Tse
·
#1366
·
|
|
Re: "X.org Preferred License"
Hi Mark,
The MIT license template on the license list [1] has the language "(including the next paragraph)" as optional text, which is why that part shows up in blue italics on the list [2].
I think
Hi Mark,
The MIT license template on the license list [1] has the language "(including the next paragraph)" as optional text, which is why that part shows up in blue italics on the list [2].
I think
|
By
Steve Winslow
·
#1365
·
|
|
"X.org Preferred License"
The "X.org Preferred License" documented at [
https://www.x.org/archive/current/doc/xorg-docs/License.html ] is the MIT
license with the additional text in the middle "(including the
The "X.org Preferred License" documented at [
https://www.x.org/archive/current/doc/xorg-docs/License.html ] is the MIT
license with the additional text in the middle "(including the
|
By
Mark Atwood (Amazon.com)
·
#1364
·
|
|
Referencing external spdx documents with package information from project.spdx.yml
HelloJ
I am currently working on an issue in the Oss-Review-Toolkit [1] to support referring to external SPDX files from a `project.spdx.yml` [2].
I am currently checking out the spdx-specs
HelloJ
I am currently working on an issue in the Oss-Review-Toolkit [1] to support referring to external SPDX files from a `project.spdx.yml` [2].
I am currently checking out the spdx-specs
|
By
stephanie.neubauer@...
·
#1363
·
|
|
SPDX General Meeting
Here’s a new invite for 2021. Please accept the recurring meeting
Note there will be no SPDX General Meeting in January.
****
New dial in number: 415-881-1586
No PIN needed
The weblink for
Here’s a new invite for 2021. Please accept the recurring meeting
Note there will be no SPDX General Meeting in January.
****
New dial in number: 415-881-1586
No PIN needed
The weblink for
|
By
Phil Odence
·
#1362
·
|
|
Canceled: SPDX General Meeting
This is an old meeting. Please ignore.
This is an old meeting. Please ignore.
|
By
Phil Odence
·
#1361
·
|
|
Ignore meeting cancellation
I am trying to remove a legacy event from an old calendar. I think you will receive a cancellation of this old meeting. Apologies, just ignore. We are on for a General Meeting next week.
Happy New
I am trying to remove a legacy event from an old calendar. I think you will receive a cancellation of this old meeting. Apologies, just ignore. We are on for a General Meeting next week.
Happy New
|
By
Phil Odence
·
#1360
·
|
|
SPDX December General Meeting Minutes
Happy Holidays, All. See you in 2021!
https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2020-12-03
General Meeting/Minutes/2020-12-03
< General Meeting | Minutes
· Attendance:
Happy Holidays, All. See you in 2021!
https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2020-12-03
General Meeting/Minutes/2020-12-03
< General Meeting | Minutes
· Attendance:
|
By
Phil Odence
·
#1359
·
|
|
Thursday SPDX General Meeting Reminder
GENERAL MEETING
Meeting Time: Thurs, Dec 3, 8am PT / 10 am CT / 11am ET / 15:00UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html
Conf call dial-in:
New dial in number: 415-881-1586
No
GENERAL MEETING
Meeting Time: Thurs, Dec 3, 8am PT / 10 am CT / 11am ET / 15:00UTC. http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html
Conf call dial-in:
New dial in number: 415-881-1586
No
|
By
Phil Odence
·
#1358
·
|
|
Thursday SPDX General Meeting Reminder
Sorry for the late notice.
Today we will have the standard agenda plus a walkthrough of the state of the 3.0 spec.
GENERAL MEETING
Meeting Time: Thurs, Nov 5, 8am PT / 10 am CT / 11am
Sorry for the late notice.
Today we will have the standard agenda plus a walkthrough of the state of the 3.0 spec.
GENERAL MEETING
Meeting Time: Thurs, Nov 5, 8am PT / 10 am CT / 11am
|
By
Phil Odence
·
#1357
·
|
|
SPDX General Meeting Minutes and Webpage Update
There was full support for the webpage updates at the General Meeting. The plan is on to move forward if no one raises any concerns in the next week. (text of update is at the bottom of this email)
There was full support for the webpage updates at the General Meeting. The plan is on to move forward if no one raises any concerns in the next week. (text of update is at the bottom of this email)
|
By
Phil Odence
·
#1356
·
|
|
Thursday SPDX General Meeting Reminder - w/brief website discussion
Funding SPDX Tool Hosting…$284 to go to our goal: Thanks to a number of contributions (and especially generous contributions from OpenChain, Qualcomm and our own Jilayne) we’ve blown past our
Funding SPDX Tool Hosting…$284 to go to our goal: Thanks to a number of contributions (and especially generous contributions from OpenChain, Qualcomm and our own Jilayne) we’ve blown past our
|
By
Phil Odence
·
#1355
·
|
|
SPDX Webpage Update
All,
The SPDX Core Team has been working on a long overdue update to some of the web content that describes the spec and the project. Below is what we’ve come up with. We think it’s good to go,
All,
The SPDX Core Team has been working on a long overdue update to some of the web content that describes the spec and the project. Below is what we’ve come up with. We think it’s good to go,
|
By
Phil Odence
·
#1354
·
|