spdx@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: SPDX license identifier for bzip2 are strange, why?

< bcc general list as FYI for anyone who wants to follow the discussion, but moving to legal list> Quick search shows: - both version were on the list when we moved to the XML format in 2016 - email

By J Lovejoy · #1331 ·

SPDX license identifier for bzip2 are strange, why?

Hi! I’ve started looking at the license and the SPDX identifiers on the “bzip2” project. The license looks like a unsurprising BSD variant, but weirdly it’s been getting a versioned

By Mark Atwood (Amazon.com) · #1330 ·

Funding for Hosting On-Line SPDX Tools

The SPDX Work Group needs your help to host on-line tools. As you may know, SPDX runs on shoestring with support from the Linux Foundation but no corporate contributions. There are benefits to the

By Phil Odence · #1329 ·

Thursday's SPDX General Meeting Reminder - Special Presentation

Special Presentation by Rishabh Bhatnager, one of our Google Summer of Code students Title: Golang Parallel RDF Parser Description: Building a GoLang RDF reader in native GoLang which not only

By Phil Odence · #1328 ·

Re: Thursday's SPDX General Meeting Reminder - Special Presentation

yes, it's the 4th :) On 6/3/20 2:04 PM, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:

By J Lovejoy · #1327 ·

Re: Thursday's SPDX General Meeting Reminder - Special Presentation

Is not Thursday June 4th? On Wed, 2020-06-03 at 18:58 +0000, Phil Odence wrote:This e-mail and any attachment(s) are intended only for the recipient(s) named above and others who have been

By Jeremiah C. Foster · #1326 ·

Thursday's SPDX General Meeting Reminder - Special Presentation

Special Presentation Title: The Use of SPDX for SBOM Content by the NTIA Software Transparency Initiative Abstract: The NTIA Transparency Initiative has established a Healthcare

By Phil Odence · #1325 ·

SPDX website updates

Hello SPDX community, This is a follow-up from discussions on several of the SPDX general meetings and workgroup calls over the past couple of months. The TL;DR version is: The main static pages for

By Steve Winslow · #1324 ·

May SPDX General Meeting Minutes

https://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2020-05-07 General Meeting/Minutes/2020-05-07 < General Meeting‎ | Minutes · Attendance: 19 · Lead by Phil Odence ·

By Phil Odence · #1323 ·

Thursday's SPDX General Meeting Reminder - Special Presentation

One thing that remains normal in the world is the SPDX General Meeting. This month Kate Stewart will be reviewing what’s new in the just-buttoned-up 2.2 release. GENERAL MEETING Meeting

By Phil Odence · #1322 ·

SPDX 2.2 Specification Review Window - ends May 1, 2020

Hi all, The SPDX 2.2 specification is now in the final 2 week public review window. The SPDX tech-list participants have been working on polishing it for the last couple of months and adding in

By Kate Stewart · #1321 ·

Re: Chime instead of Zoom, a modest proposal

This would be a good time to note that folks who care about their software freedom cannot effectively participate in SPDX, and not only because the conferencing solution is proprietary software

By Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@...> · #1320 ·

Re: Chime instead of Zoom, a modest proposal

Quoting Jeremiah C. Foster (2020-04-15 18:57:24) For the pragmatic angle of "does it work reliably" I agree that Jitsi is a viable option. Any conferencing service _can_ become unreliable when

By Jonas Smedegaard · #1319 ·

Re: Chime instead of Zoom, a modest proposal

I've used Jitsi meet a bit and it is pretty decent too; https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet One caveat with tools that use WebRTC - there is no E2E encryption yet in the protocol. Matrix however does

By Jeremiah C. Foster · #1318 ·

wiki.spdx.org service migration 2020-04-19 @ 19:00 to 20:0 UTC

What: The Linux Foundation will be moving wiki.spdx.org to new infrastructure When: Sunday, April 19, 2020 @ 19:00 to 20:00 UTC Why: Improving capacity and reliability of underlying

By Ryan Finnin Day <rday@...> · #1317 ·

Re: Chime instead of Zoom, a modest proposal

"James Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...> writes: Yeah, FSF is running an instance that is being used to successfully teach classes at MIT right now. We'll post more about it soon,

By John Sullivan <johns@...> · #1316 ·

Re: Chime instead of Zoom, a modest proposal

Wow that's a blast from the early part of this millenium. Since Linux now runs over 80% of the world's computing resources, I thought we'd got over stigmatizing people who actually run it on their

By James Bottomley · #1315 ·

Re: Chime instead of Zoom, a modest proposal

The good folks at FSFE maintain a wiki page with Free Software alternatives: https://wiki.fsfe.org/Activities/FreeSoftware4RemoteWorking I should point out that in the SPDX calls we don't actually

By Alexios Zavras · #1314 ·

Re: Chime instead of Zoom, a modest proposal

wrote: So no app for Linux then? As you can appreciate, a lot of us have now been evaluating a whole range of video conference technologies and one of the empirical rules I've been seeing is that

By James Bottomley · #1313 ·

Re: Chime instead of Zoom, a modest proposal

Jumping in randomly: would be super interested in exploring this for OpenChain if that’s on the table. Shane

By Shane Coughlan · #1312 ·

361 - 380 of 1691

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms