spdx@lists.spdx.org

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: Chime instead of Zoom, a modest proposal

wrote: So no app for Linux then? As you can appreciate, a lot of us have now been evaluating a whole range of video conference technologies and one of the empirical rules I've been seeing is that

By James Bottomley · #1313 ·

Re: Chime instead of Zoom, a modest proposal

Jumping in randomly: would be super interested in exploring this for OpenChain if that’s on the table. Shane

By Shane Coughlan · #1312 ·

Re: Chime instead of Zoom, a modest proposal

I've used the Linux Zoom client nearly every day for a few weeks now, and less often for several months before that. It's been seamless for all the core talk-and-watch functionality. It does lag a

By Kyle Mitchell · #1311 ·

Re: Chime instead of Zoom, a modest proposal

One of the benefits of using Zoom is its native Linux client. Does Chime offer a Linux client? If not, I think it is kinda weird (given the year of the Linux desktop) to use something that isn't

By Jeremiah C. Foster · #1310 ·

Re: Chime instead of Zoom, a modest proposal

Hi Mark, Thanks for the generous offer. :-) We're not paying for zoom, however I'm definitely up for doing an experiment during our spdx-tech meeting tomorrow, and if it works for the regular

By Kate Stewart · #1309 ·

Chime instead of Zoom, a modest proposal

Hi Kate and other SPDX folk, We have been using Zoom to provide teleconference for SPDX meetings. In light of recent events, Zoom has gotten very popular, and also been failing many security audits,

By Mark Atwood (Amazon.com) · #1308 ·

April General SPDX Meeting Minutes

A great meeting with great attendance. Please volunteer or suggest a guest speaker for next time. Anything SPDX related is fair game.

By Phil Odence · #1307 ·

Thursday's SPDX General Meeting Reminder - Including Special Guest Star

We’ll be pleased to welcome “professor-turned-technocrat” Allan Friedman, the Director of Cybersecurity at NTIA. He is at the center of NTIA’s effort to standard a software BOM and an SPDX

By Phil Odence · #1306 ·

SPDX License List inclusion principles and 3.9 release

Hello all, Following from Jilayne's email earlier this month, the legal team has now finalized and posted the update to the license inclusion principles for the SPDX License List. The updated

By Steve Winslow · #1305 ·

SPDX legal team call tomorrow

Hi all, The SPDX legal team has its regular bi-weekly call tomorrow, Thursday at noon, Eastern Daylight Savings time (note: The US moved our clocks forward, but I believe the UK and Europe has yet to

By J Lovejoy · #1304 ·

Re: SPDX License List license inclusion guidelines

Hi Kyle, Thanks for having a look. As to your question: we had a discussion on one of the many calls we discussed this topic and ran the hypothetical of what if there were no “rules” or the

By J Lovejoy · #1303 ·

Re: SPDX License List license inclusion guidelines

All, I am both impressed by the work Jilayne and others have put into the guidelines, and in strong sympathy with the general thrust Philippe reports from the conference. I didn't go to FOSDEM, but

By Kyle Mitchell · #1302 ·

Re: Is an UNCOPYRIGHTABLE License (or keyword) needed? #poll

> +1 from me on everything David said (quoted below for convenience) +1

By Jeremiah C. Foster · #1301 ·

Re: Is an UNCOPYRIGHTABLE License (or keyword) needed? #poll

+1 from me on everything David said (quoted below for convenience) cheers, Matija --

By Matija Šuklje · #1300 ·

Re: SPDX License List license inclusion guidelines

Hi Jilayne: On January 31st a compliance tooling meeting and hackathon took place in Brussels before FOSDEM [1]. One of the session topics was SPDX. Everyone there agreed that SPDX license inclusion

By Philippe Ombredanne · #1299 ·

Re: Is an UNCOPYRIGHTABLE License (or keyword) needed? #poll

> A new poll has been created… I would prefer another option NOT in the poll (and thus have not voted): Treat it as just another license statement. There are multiple ways this kind of

By David A. Wheeler · #1298 ·

SPDX License List license inclusion guidelines

Hi all, I’m sending this to both the legal and general mailing lists to ensure greatest visibility. The legal team has come up with a final draft of the license inclusion guidelines based on

By J Lovejoy · #1297 ·

SPDX License List - license inclusion guidelines

Hi all, As has been mentioned on recent general calls, the legal team has been discussing a revision of the license inclusion guidelines off and on over the past year. We have a draft iteration that

By J Lovejoy · #1296 ·

Re: Is an UNCOPYRIGHTABLE License (or keyword) needed? #poll

Hello all, there has been a related thread going on in the spdx-legal list: see https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/topic/71831424 As mentioned in that thread, I would note the Legal Team's comments

By Steve Winslow · #1295 ·

Re: Is an UNCOPYRIGHTABLE License (or keyword) needed? #poll

Hi Michael, One concern with an "UNCOPYRIGHTABLE" identifier is that its existence could give rise to inappropriate application by authors. It's often quite difficult to conclusively determine whether

By Aaron Williamson <aaron@...> · #1294 ·

381 - 400 of 1693

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms