Hi, Whilst preparing for SPDX bakeoff I noticed a few issues with my interpretation of the specification that may be worth discussion. Firstly a number of fields in tag files contain arbitrary

Hi Bradley, There are no licensing requirements for tools themselves to participate in the bake-off, the only requirement is that they are able to produce (and ideally consume) valid SPDX files.

Hi, The SPDX tech team will be hosting an SPDX Tools BakeOff at LinuxCon Europe on 6 October 2016. Participation can be remote by phone or in person. The Bake-off (also known by some as a Plugfest)

Thank you for the suggestions Yev, I will give them a try! Mike From: Yev Bronshteyn <ybronshteyn@...> Date: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 at 3:16 PM To: "STAIR, MICHAEL A" <ms1784@...>,

A slight correction to the above – the sparql query in my previous email may be too simplistic in that it does not include files that are inside of packages (as package contents are not necessarily

Hi, Michael, I don’t know much about RDF graphing tools, but here’s a trick to make any tool you already have produce a better graph. You can use this sparql query to reduce an SPDX

Hello, I was wondering if anyone can suggest a tool to visually in a graph (ideally interactive) SPDX RDF files, specifically to follow relationships? I am currently using gruff

Cancelling the October meeting as it conflicts with LinuxCon Europe. We will have a special presentation for the November meeting on OpenChain. ******* Join the call:

Hi Michael, Glad to hear of your interest in contributing to the tools. We can discuss on the next tech call, but feel free to contribute issues and pull requests on GitHub. The only request is on

Hi Michael, Yes, feel free to join us on the weekly call (Tuesday at 1pm Eastern) details: http://wiki.spdx.org/view/Technical_Team for Q&A or send email to spdx-tech@... with your

Hello, I attended the general meeting today but had some issues with my audio so was unable to ask a few questions. Is attending the technical team meeting the appropriate way to discuss

Thanks Gary, Sorry I had to leave mid way through the report. Couple of minor adjustments to the minutes. The review window for SPDX 2.1 spec is now closed. Its been open for a 1.5 months, and

Greetings all, Below is the minutes from today’s general meeting. Meeting minutes are also available on the Wiki at http://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2016-09-01 Please let

No special guest star this month, so plan on a <30minute meeting. Note: I only just realized that I neglected to publish the minutes from the August meeting, so I am including at the bottom.

Please join us this week. Alexios Zavras will begin the meeting with an informal presentation on Intel’s use and plans for SPDX. GENERAL MEETING Meeting Time: Thurs, Aug 4, 8am PDT / 10 am CDT

Thanks for the update, Tom, and for updating your email address on the mailing lists :) Congrats! Jilayne SPDX Legal Team co-lead opensource@...

Hi, I didn't mention this on the call, but I wanted to update you all that my last day at AGMB is tomorrow. As of next week, I will be a partner in the firm of Pryor Cashman

http://wiki.spdx.org/view/General_Meeting/Minutes/2016-07-07 General Meeting/Minutes/2016-07-07 < General Meeting‎ | Minutes Attendance: 13 Lead by Phil Odence Minutes of June meeting

Please join us this week. Sam Ellis will kick the meeting off with a presentation on ARM’s use of and plans for SPDX. GENERAL MEETING Meeting Time: Thurs, July 7, 8am PDT / 10 am CDT / 11am EDT /

Greetings, The tech team is winding up the remaining minor changes, and has declared the SPDX 2.1 specification ready for wider public review. The review window will end on July 29th, and if