Great, Bradley. When I find someone who will *do* that work, we will
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
definitely ask for you input!
On 6/28/12 12:02 PM, "Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn@...> wrote:
Jilayne Lovejoy wrote at 16:02 (EDT) on Wednesday:
So, if you have an idea as to how to implement this idea, whileIMO, "implementing" is trivial. The tough part is careful cataloging to
keeping in mind the overall goal of the LIcense List, etc. - that
would be great!!
know *what* to add to the list. For example, obviously, no one did the
work of cataloging the exceptions in GCC, which is why the license of
GCC can't be represented by SPDX for any version of GCC (See my other
post about that:
If someone wants to do the work of cataloging the exceptions in GCC, I'd
be happy to advise, since I was involved with Brett Smith when he did
the work during the 3.1 RTL exception drafting process. Cc me on any
email threads that are working on this and I'll try to allocate time to
But, note that exceptions are all over the place, in things like
Classpath, autoconf, and plenty of other places. I wonder: has anyone
taken a Fossology (the best scanning tool available as Free Software)
run of Debian distribution and just made sure every license it finds has
a moniker in SPDX? If not, why not? Seems like a necessary first step
for SPDX to have any chance of being complete.
Spdx mailing list