Re: license name question
Lamons, Scott (Open Source Program Office) <scott.lamons@...>
This is the way I read it as well. However I don't know why they wouldn't just license it under GPLv2 or GPLv3 and eliminate the "or (at your option) any later version..." which seems completely unnecessary and forces you into effectively dealing with a non-standard license in SPDX.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
My 2 cents. -Scott -----Original Message----- |
|