Re: license name question
|
Armijn Hemel <armijn@...>
On 05/25/2011 05:34 PM, Bob Gobeille wrote:
I just ran into the following license. It is GPL v2 or GPL v3+ KDE exception. Note the absence of GPLv2.1. If 2.1 was included, the name would be GPL-2+-with-KDE-exception, but since it isn't, what is the protocol?I've never heard of GPLv2.1, but if you mean LGPLv2.1, the KDE project has a similar license for that too. Basically this license says: "KDE e.V. currently only approves GPLv2 or GPLv3, but if the members of KDE e.V. approve a newer version, then that license is OK for this code too" armijn -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ armijn@... || http://www.gpl-violations.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
|