Re: license name question
Jilayne Lovejoy <jilayne.lovejoy@...>
This would be GPL-2+ - as it's really just describing GPL v2 or later.
THere is no GPL v2.1 (that would be LGPL v2.1, I know, confusing!) As for the KDE exception - the notice reads to me that KDE is reserving the right to approve future versions of the GPL for use as the license for this code, which seems different to me than an exception. I understand it to be saying - 'if there's a GPL v4, we want the chance to check that out and accept or not accecpt it instead of preemptively saying we'll accept a license before it has even been written.' Makes sense and seems reasonable, actually. I guess I would think of this as different than an exception, since usually an exception usually adds or modifies the terms of the original license, which I suppose this does in a way, but in a different way than we usually think of? Jilayne On 5/25/11 9:34 AM, "Bob Gobeille" <bob.gobeille@...> wrote: I just ran into the following license. It is GPL v2 or GPL v3+ KDEJilayne Lovejoy | Corporate Counsel jlovejoy@... 720 240 4545 | phone 720 240 4556 | fax 1 888 OpenLogic | toll free www.openlogic.com OpenLogic, Inc. 10910 W 120th Ave, Suite 450 Broomfield, Colorado 80021 |
|