Re: Purpose of licensing info


Peter Williams <peter.williams@...>
 

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Esteban Rockett <mgia3940@...> wrote:

Below please find the revised Section 5.3 text discussed during our
last meeting, for your comment.
I think Package should have an optional concluded licensing field also.

5.3a.4 Tag: "LicenseConcluded:"
Given that the value of this property is potentially a disjunctive set
of licenses (or license sets) would "Licensing" be better than
"License" in the name?

Also, -- and this one is just a matter of curiosity -- why was that
word order chosen? "ConcludedLicense" seems like a more idiomatic
formulation.

Peter

PS: I missed the last call so i apologize if these issues where covered there.

Join spdx@lists.spdx.org to automatically receive all group messages.