Peter Williams said on Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 12:25:40PM -0700:

I think having an "version or later" license set is best way to
handle this. Perhaps we could predefine some common "version or
later" license sets (such as GPv2OrLater) to improve the simplicity
and clarity.

I think we should not re-invent the wheel here. In .spec files for RPMs
packages, there is already tags for GPLv2 and GPLv2+. Why not indeed
reuse that approach ?

Bruno.
--
Open Source & Linux Profession Lead EMEA / http://opensource.hp.com
HP/Intel/Red Hat Open Source Solutions Initiative / http://www.hpintelco.net
http://www.HyPer-Linux.org http://mondorescue.org http://project-builder.org
La musique ancienne? http://www.musique-ancienne.org http://www.medieval.org