Re: updated license list
Bruno Cornec <Bruno.Cornec@...>
Hello,
Jilayne Lovejoy said on Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 09:19:54AM -0600: Here is the next version of the license list (v1.2) that includes theI think there is a problem line 32 of the LicenseList v1.2 file: Column A mentions version 1.0 wheresas column B says 3.0. I wonder if there shouldn't be a mention of the GFDL in this file as well (with the multiple versions)? (CC are there) Speaking of versions, I wonder whether there should'nt always be a version mentioned, to support easily future revisions of the license not having multiple version yet. For dates, wouldn't it be more interesting (wrt sort, ...) to use the ISO format: 2010-11-04 instead of the European one, which may be confusing for non-european people. HTH, Bruno. -- Open Source & Linux Profession Lead EMEA / http://opensource.hp.com HP/Intel/Red Hat Open Source Solutions Initiative / http://www.hpintelco.net http://www.HyPer-Linux.org http://mondorescue.org http://project-builder.org La musique ancienne? http://www.musique-ancienne.org http://www.medieval.org
|
|