Re: SPDX License List v2.4 released
Hi Sam,
Yes - we deliberately produce both files.
Originally, the site was created with HTML files without the .html extension.
There were problems in rendering pages. After many attempts at trying to configure the webserver to properly encode/handle the errors, we decided to move to generating pages with the .html suffixes.
Since there were some applications accessing the files without extensions programmatically, we decided to generate both files for backwards compatibility reasons - they are exact duplicates.
It is recommended to use the .html rather than the files with no extensions.
It looks like the rendering error is due to the © in the template which was recently added.
I'm not sure why this is tripping on this, but if you run the W3C validator on the file, it seems to complain about the encoding configuration of the webserver.
I'll re-generate the files and change the © to (c) which should fix the problem. I'll include this with the fix for the NLOD-1.0 license.
I should have the files uploaded within the next day or so.
Gary
Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 10:05 AM
To: J Lovejoy; Zavras, Alexios
Cc: SPDX-legal; SPDX-general
Subject: RE: SPDX License List v2.4 released
I see an error reported at the top of this page:
https://spdx.org/licenses/Artistic-2.0
The error is:
error on line 213 at column 22: Entity 'copy' not defined
I obtained this URL by searching for “spdx perl artistic license 2.0” in google.
Interestingly there is no error here:
https://spdx.org/licenses/Artistic-2.0.html
Do we deliberately provide two URLs for each license?
From: spdx-legal-bounces@... [mailto:spdx-legal-bounces@...] On Behalf Of J Lovejoy
Sent: 08 April 2016 17:36
To: Zavras, Alexios
Cc: SPDX-legal; SPDX-general
Subject: Re: SPDX License List v2.4 released
Thanks for catching this Alexios - you are right as to where the error is coming from…
I’ll work with Gary to fix this.
Jilayne
SPDX Legal Team co-lead
opensource@...
On Apr 8, 2016, at 6:52 AM, Zavras, Alexios <alexios.zavras@...> wrote:
This license is empty: http://spdx.org/licenses/NLOD-1.0.html
I assume because the reference (at least in the Excel file) is to “NLOD-1..txt” instead of “NLOD-1.0.txt”.
-- zvr
From: spdx-legal-bounces@... [mailto:spdx-legal-bounces@...] On Behalf Of J Lovejoy
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 12:41 AM
To: SPDX-legal <spdx-legal@...>; SPDX-general <spdx@...>
Subject: SPDX License List v2.4 released
Hi All,
Version 2.4 of the SPDX License List is now available in the usual places. We added 9 new licenses for this release, including some international licenses and newly-approved by the OSI.http://spdx.org/licenses/
You will also notice a new look to the license list pages - this is part of the new website revamp. You will see the new look on the rest of the pages soon!
Thanks,
Jilayne
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10-12, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Christian Lamprechter
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.